UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Filed by the Registrant

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12§240.14a-12

Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 


LOGO


Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.

BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.

505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300

Herndon, Virginia 20170

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 13, 2018

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 18, 2022

To the shareholdersstockholders of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.:

The 20182022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Stockholdersof Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, FL, 34108Beacon’s corporate headquarters, 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20170 on Tuesday,Friday, February 13, 2018,18, 2022, at 8:00 a.m. local time, for the purpose of considering and voting on the following matters:

(1)

Election of eleventwelve members to our Board of Directors to hold office until the 20192023 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified (Proposal No. 1);

(2)

To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018December 31, 2022 (Proposal No. 2);

(3)

To approve the compensation for our named executive officers as presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosures contained in the accompanying proxy statement on a non-binding, advisory basis (Proposal No. 3); and

(4)

The transaction of such other business as may properly come before the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof.

Although our Board of Directors intends to carefully consider the shareholder votesstockholder vote resulting from Proposal No. 3, thoseNos. Two and Three, the final votesvote will not be binding on us and areis advisory in nature. All holders of record of shares of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. stock (Nasdaq:BECN) at the close of business on December 18, 201722, 2021 are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and to vote at the meeting. Your attention is directed to the accompanying proxy statement for further information with respect to the matters to be acted upon at the meeting.

Whether or not you expect to be present, please vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed pre-addressed envelope as promptly as possible. No postage is required if mailed in the United States.

Given the ongoing public health concerns related to the coronavirus pandemic, we urge you to consider voting in advance of the meeting via one of the remote methods described above in lieu of attending the meeting in person. Although we intend to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we are monitoring the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, and we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may recommend or impose. Measures that we intend to follow at this year’s Annual Meeting are expected to include conducting health screenings for persons seeking entry to the meeting, enforcing social distancing guidelines for all attendees, and requiring all attendees to wear masks. In the event that it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meeting in person or at the scheduled date, time or location, we will announce alternative arrangements for the Annual Meeting via a press release and a public filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as promptly as practicable. Alternative arrangements may include holding the Annual Meeting solely by means of remote communication in a virtual meeting format.

By Order of the Board of Directors

/s/ Ross D. Cooper

Ross D. Cooper

Secretary

Herndon, Virginia

January 10, 2018

 

LOGO

CHRISTINE S. REDDY, Corporate Secretary

Herndon, Virginia

January 14, 2022


This is an important meeting and all shareholdersstockholders are invited to attend the meeting in person. Those shareholdersstockholders who are unable to attend are respectfully urged to vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed return envelope. No postage is required if mailed in the United States. ShareholdersStockholders who execute a proxy card may nevertheless attend the meeting, revoke their proxy and vote their shares in person.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be Heldheld on February 13, 2018:18, 2022: This proxy statement and the fiscal year 20172021 Annual Report are also available at www.proxydocs.com/BECN.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Proxy Summary   i   Proposal Three: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation   22  
Proxy Statement 1 Executive Officers 23

Purpose of Meeting

 1 Information on Executive Compensation 25

Board Recommendations

 1 Compensation Discussion and Analysis 25

Attendance at the Annual Meeting

 2 

Overview

 25

Voting Quorum

 2 

Objectives of Compensation Program

 25

Required Votes

 2 

Use of Consultants and Peer Group Data

 26

Effect of Not Voting

 3 

Base Salaries

 26

Voting Methods

 3 

Annual Cash Incentives

 27

Revoking Proxies

 3 

Equity Compensation

 30

Solicitation Costs

 3 

Employment Agreements

 32
Summary of Business Matters to be Voted On 4 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 33
Proposal One: Election of Directors 4 

Retirement and Executive Life Insurance Plans

 33
Information About our Nominees 5 

Perquisites

 33
Board of Directors’ Meetings, Committees of the Board and Related Matters 11 

Tax Deductibility of Compensation

 33

Director Independence

 11 

Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy

 34

Board Committees and Meetings

 11 Report of the Compensation Committee 34

Director Selection

 13 Executive Compensation 35

Director Experience

 14 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-
Control

 38

Director Diversity

 14 

Pay Ratio

 41

Compensation of Directors

 15 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 41

Board Leadership Structure

 15 

Compensation of Directors

 42

Role in Risk Oversight

 16 Stock Ownership 44

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)

 17 Equity Compensation Plan Information 46

Retirement Age

 18 Corporate Governance 47

Orientation Training and Continuing Development Education

 18 Code of Ethics and Business Conduct 47

Stockholder Communications to the Board

 18 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 47
Proposal Two: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 19 Policies and Procedures with Respect to Transactions with Related Persons 49

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 19 Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports 49

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services

 20 Information Concerning Stockholder Proposals 49

Report of the Audit Committee

 20 Other Business 50


PROXY SUMMARY

To assist you in reviewing the proposals to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, we call your attention to the following information about Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.’s (“Beacon”, the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) financial performance, key executive compensation actions and decisions, and corporate governance highlights. The following description is only a summary. For more complete information about these topics, please review the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2021, and the complete Proxy Statement that follows.

505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300

  Proposals That Require Your Vote

More
Information
Board
Recommendation
Vote Required for
Approval

  PROPOSAL ONE

Election of twelve (12) directorsPage 4FOR each Director
Nominee
Plurality of the votes
entitled to be cast in the
election of directors

  PROPOSAL TWO

Ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm

Page 19FORMajority of votes cast

  PROPOSAL THREE

Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation

Page 22FORMajority of votes cast

About Beacon

Beacon is the largest publicly traded distributor of roofing materials and complementary building products in North America. We have served the building industry for over 90 years and as of September 30, 2021, operated 446 branches throughout all 50 states in the U.S. and six provinces in Canada. We offer an extensive range of high-quality professional grade exterior products comprising over 100,000 stock-keeping units, and we serve over 80,000 residential and non-residential customers who trust us to help them save time, work more efficiently, and enhance their businesses.

Herndon, Virginia 20170We differentiate ourselves in the industry by providing our customers with seamless execution, practical innovation, and a hands-on approach that allows us to serve each of our individual customer’s specific needs. We also work closely with our suppliers, who rely on us to position their products advantageously in the market, supporting advances in products and services that ultimately benefit our customers.

Our mission is to empower our customers to build more for their customers, businesses and communities. Our project lifecycle support helps our customers find projects, land the job, do the work (including initial build projects as well as post-build repairs and life cycle replacements) and close it out with guidance that allows them to deliver on project specifications and timelines that are critical to their success. Using an omni-channel approach and our PRO+ digital suite, we differentiate our services and drive customer retention. Our customer base is composed of professional contractors, home builders, building owners, lumberyards and retailers across the United States and Canada who depend on reliable local access to building products for residential and non-residential projects. Our customers vary in size, ranging from relatively small contractors to large contractors and builders that operate on a national scale. A significant number of our customers have relied on us as their vendor of choice for decades.

Our product lines are designed to meet the requirements of our residential, non-residential and complementary building products customers. We carry one of the most extensive arrays of high-quality branded products in the industry, including our private label brand, TRI-BUILT. Our TRI-BUILT products offer a high-quality and superior-value alternative for our customers while delivering higher margins and brand exclusivity in the marketplace. We fulfill the vast majority of our warehouse orders with inventory on hand because of the breadth and depth of the inventories at our branches based on precise inventory management.

 

PROXY STATEMENT- i -


Beyond product delivery, we emphasize superior value-added services to our customers. We employ a knowledgeable sales force that possesses an in-depth understanding of roofing and the building products we provide. Our sales force provides guidance to our customers throughout the lifecycles of their projects, including training, technical support and access to Beacon PRO+ and 3D+, where they can find leads, track storms, order online, track deliveries, view order history, participate in promotions and pay invoices.

 

Business Highlights

DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF ANNUAL MEETINGFiscal 2021 Key Financial Performance Metrics

This proxy statement is furnished in connection

Net Sales

Gross Margin

Net Income

$6.64 billion

26.5%

$221.2 million

Net sales from continuing operations increased 12.3% from fiscal year 2020 due to strong demand and the benefit of price increases across all three of Beacon’s product categories.Gross margin from continuing operations was up 250 basis points from fiscal year 2020 primarily due to an increased weighted-average selling price of Beacon’s products (partially offset by higher product cost) as well as a favorable line of business mix and sales of the Company’s private label brand, TRI-BUILT.Net income from continuing operations of $221.2 million in fiscal year 2021 as compared to a loss of $81.3 million in fiscal year 2020.

Other Business Highlights

Beacon completed the sale of its interior products and insulation business on February 10, 2021 and completed the sale of its solar products business on December 1, 2021, both as part of its strategy to focus on its core exterior customers.

On November 1, 2021, Beacon completed the acquisition of Midway Sales & Distributing, Inc., a leading Midwest distributor of residential and commercial exterior building and roofing supplies with the solicitation by10 branches across Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska and annual sales of approximately $130 million.

Compensation Highlights

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) continues its historic practice of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.performance incentives, pursuant to which the Company’s executives may earn annual cash incentives and long-term incentive compensation in the form of proxies fromCompany stock options and restricted stock unit awards.

The annual cash incentives for our named executive officers are based (1) 60% on an adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization target, (2) 20% on a Company-wide operating working capital as a percentage of sales target, and (3) 20% on qualitative performance evaluations of strategic performance goals.

Every year, we provide for a stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation, which gives stockholders the holders of our common stock, par value $.01 per share, for use at our 2018opportunity to endorse or not endorse the Company’s named executive compensation program. At the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held atStockholders, our stockholders approved the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, FL, 34108 on Tuesday, February 13, 2018, at 8:00 a.m. local time or at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s)Company’s named executive compensation program with approximately 97.6% of the annual meeting.

This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy arevotes cast being mailed on or about January 10, 2018 to shareholders of record as of December 18, 2017. Shareholders should review the information providedvoted in this proxy statement in conjunction with our 2017 Annual Report that accompanies this proxy statement. In this proxy statement, we refer to Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. as “we,” “our” and the “Company.” This proxy statement and the 2017 Annual Report are also available to be viewed and downloaded at www.proxydocs.com/BECN.

Our principal executive offices are located at 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170.favor.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

ABOUT THE MEETING

1

STOCK OWNERSHIP

4

SUMMARY OF BUSINESS MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON

7

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS, COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD AND RELATED MATTERS

13

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

17

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

20

INFORMATION ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

21

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

36

EMPLOYEE CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS AND CONDUCT

36

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

36

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

37

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

37

OTHER BUSINESS

37

INFORMATION CONCERNING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

38

Corporate Governance Highlights

i


ABOUT THE MEETING

What isOn August 11, 2021, the date, time and place of the annual meeting?

The Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Tuesday, February 13, 2018, beginning at 8:00 a.m., local time, at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, FL 34108.

What is the purpose of the annual meeting?

At the annual meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters outlined in the notice of meeting on the cover page of this proxy statement, consisting of 1) election of directors; 2) ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP asBoard approved changing the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmfiscal year end from September 30 to December 31 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018; 3) approvalDecember 31, 2022.

Beacon has a longstanding commitment to effective governance of the compensation of our named executive officers on a non-binding, advisory basis;its business and 4) any other matters that properly come before the meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

Only our shareholders of record at the close of business on December 18, 2017, the record dateaffairs for the meeting, are entitledbenefit of stockholders. The Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee periodically reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines to receive noticemaintain effective and appropriate standards of corporate governance.

We also maintain a Code of Ethics and to participate in the annual meeting. If you were a shareholderBusiness Conduct (the “Code”) that establishes standards of record on that date, you will be entitled to vote all of the shares you held on that date at the meeting, or any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) of the meeting. As of the record date, there were 67,968,822 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which are entitled to be voted at the annual meeting.

A list of our shareholders will be available at our headquarters at 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170conduct and expectations for a period of ten days prior to the annual meeting and at the annual meeting itself for examination by any shareholder.

What are the voting rights of the holders of our common stock?

Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on each matter that is submitted to shareholders for approval.

Who can attend the meeting?

All of our shareholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting, and each may be accompanied by one guest. Please also note that if you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker or other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of common stock representing a majority of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of stock on the record date will constitute a quorum, permitting the meeting to conduct its business. As of the record date, there were 67,968,822 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which are entitled to be voted at the annual meeting.

What vote is required to approve each item?

For purposes of electing directors at the annual meeting, the nominees receiving the support of our shareholders representing the greatest numbers of shares of common stock present at the meeting, in person or by proxy and entitled to vote, shall be elected as directors. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote is required for the: ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP; approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; and approval of any other matter that may be submitted to a vote of our shareholders.

Although our Board of Directors intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, that vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.

1


The inspector of election for the annual meeting shall determine the number of shares of common stock represented at the meeting, the existence of a quorum and the validity and effect of proxies, and shall count and tabulate ballots and votes and determine the results thereof. Proxies received but marked as abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. A “broker non-vote” will occur when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary power with respect to that proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast “for” or votes “withheld” for the election of directors. On other matters submitted for a vote, broker non-votes will not be considered in tallying votes cast, and abstentions will be treated as a vote “against.” If less than a majority of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock is represented at the annual meeting, a majority of the shares so represented may adjourn the annual meeting from time to time without further notice.

What are the Board’s recommendations?

As more fully discussed under Summary of Business Matters to be Voted On, our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the respective nominees for director named in this proxy statement; FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP; and FOR approval of the executive compensation.

Unless contrary instructions are indicated on the enclosed proxy, all shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation (and which have not been revoked in accordance with the procedures set forth below) will be voted (1) FOR the election of the respective nominees for director named in this proxy statement; (2) FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP; (3) FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; and (4) in accordance with the recommendation of our Board of Directors, FOR or AGAINST all other matters as may properly come before the annual meeting. In the event a shareholder specifies a different choice by means of the enclosed proxy, such shares will be voted in accordance with the specification made.

How do I vote?

If you are a holder of record (that is, if your shares are registered in your own name with our transfer agent), you may vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card. Voting instructions for each method are provided on the proxy card contained in the proxy materials.

If you are a participant in the Beacon stock fund under the Beacon 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan or a Beacon employee holding shares on the Solium Shareworks platform, you may furnish voting instructions over the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card. Voting instructions for each method are provided on the proxy card contained in the proxy materials.

If you are a street name holder (that is, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record), you must vote in accordance with the voting instruction form provided by your bank, broker or other holder of record. The availability of telephone or internet voting will depend upon your bank’s, broker’s, or other holder of record’s voting process.

If you come to the meeting, you can vote in person. If you are a street name holder and wish to vote at the meeting, you must first obtain a proxy from your bank, broker or other holder of record authorizing you to vote.

Can I change my vote after I return my proxy card?

Yes. The giving of a proxy does not eliminate the right to vote in person should any shareholder giving the proxy so desire. Shareholders have an unconditional right to revoke their proxy at any time prior to the exercise of that proxy, by voting in person at the annual meeting, by filing a written revocation with our Secretary at our headquarters or by submitting a later dated proxy by telephone, over the Internet, or by mail.

2


Who pays for costs relating to the proxy materials and Annual Meeting of Shareholders?

The costs of preparing, assembling and mailing this proxy statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the enclosed Annual Report and proxy card, along with the cost of posting the proxy materials on a website, are to be borne by us. In addition to the use of mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally and by telephone, e-mail, facsimilethe overall manner in which we conduct business. The Code, along with our other policies and other electronic means. They will receive no compensation in addition to their regular salaries. We may request banks, brokersbusiness standards and other custodians, nomineesour overall risk and fiduciaries to forward copiescompliance programs, are components of mitigating the proxy material to their principals and to request authority forrisks associated with the executionoperation of proxies. We may reimburse these persons for their expenses in so doing.our business. The full text of our Code is available on our website at www.becn.com.

 

3- ii -


STOCK OWNERSHIP

Who are the largest owners of our common stock? How many shares of common stock do our directors and executive officers own?

The following table shows information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock for the following:

Each shareholder known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;

Each of our directors;

Each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table in “Executive Compensation;” and

All directors and executive officers as a group.

 

 

Common Stock

Beneficially Owned(1)

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owners

 

Shares

 

 

Percent

 

Shareholders owning more than 5% of our common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CD&R Roadhouse Holdings, L.P.(2)

c/o M&C Corporate Services Limited

P.O. Box 309, Ungland House

South Church Street

George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104

Cayman Islands, British West Indies

 

 

9,694,619

 

 

 

12.5

%

The Vanguard Group(3)

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

 

 

4,599,297

 

 

 

6.8

%

Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC(4)

99 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02110

 

 

4,211,016

 

 

 

6.2

%

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(5)

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

 

 

4,087,614

 

 

 

6.0

%

BlackRock, Inc.(6)

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

 

 

4,028,095

 

 

 

5.9

%

Directors and executive officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert R. Buck(7)

 

 

54,990

 

 

*

 

Paul M. Isabella(8)

 

 

302,585

 

 

*

 

Joseph M. Nowicki(9)

 

 

39,173

 

 

*

 

Ross D. Cooper(10)

 

 

23,809

 

 

*

 

Carl T. Berquist(11)

 

 

9,020

 

 

*

 

Richard W. Frost(12)

 

 

10,455

 

 

*

 

Alan Gershenhorn(13)

 

 

6,850

 

 

*

 

Philip W. Knisely(14)

 

 

5,626

 

 

*

 

Robert M. McLaughlin(15)

 

 

10,020

 

 

*

 

Neil S. Novich(16)

 

 

10,455

 

 

*

 

Stuart A. Randle(17)

 

 

39,125

 

 

*

 

Nathan K. Sleeper(18)

 

 

 

 

*

 

Douglas Young(19)

 

 

9,455

 

 

*

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)

 

 

521,563

 

 

*

 


*

Less than 1%Board Committees

4The Board has established three (3) standing committees, each comprised with only independent directors: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Each committee meets on a regular basis, operates under a written charter and periodically performs a self-evaluation to determine whether the committee is functioning effectively and fulfilling its duties as prescribed by its charter. Each committee has the ability to hire and terminate its own outside advisors. A copy of each committee’s charter is available on our website at www.becn.com.


 

(1)Best Governance Practices

Board Diversity

Except as noted otherwise, information concerning beneficial ownershipOur Board seeks independent directors with a broad diversity of shares is as of January 2, 2018. Amounts include the number of shares beneficially owned as of that date,experience, professions, skills, geographic representation and backgrounds as well as gender and racial/ethnic diversity that will enhance the number of shares that such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days thereafter.

(2)

Based on share information for CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P. ( “CD&R Stockholder”) as of January 2, 2018 reported on Schedule 13D filed by them on January 4, 2018. CD&R Stockholder is the beneficial owner of 9,694,619 shares of common stock (the “Common Shares”) on an as-converted basis (based on the initial conversion price of $41.26, as adjusted), which are issuable upon conversion, at the optionquality of the holder,Board’s deliberations and decisions.

Our director nominees have a balance of the 400,000 sharestenure, independence, age, and diverse backgrounds, professional experience and skill sets, which provides our Board with an effective mix of Series A Cumulative Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), that, as of January 2, 2018, are held directly by CD&R Stockholder. CD&R Investment Associates IX, Ltd. (“CD&R Holdings GP”), as the general partner of CD&R Stockholder, may be deemed to beneficially own the Preferred Stock in which CD&R Stockholder has beneficial ownership. CD&R Holdings GP expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of the Preferred Stock in which CD&R Stockholder has beneficial ownership. Investmentexperience and voting decisions with respect to the Preferred Stock or Common Shares held by CD&R Stockholder or CD&R Holdings GP are made by an investment committee comprised of more than ten investment professionals of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (the “Investment Committee”). All members of the Investment Committee disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares shown as beneficially owned by CD&R Stockholder. CD&R Holdings GP is managed by a two-person board of directors. Donald J. Gogel and Kevin J. Conway, as the directors of CD&R Holdings GP, may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the Preferred Stock directly held by CD&R Stockholder. Such persons expressly disclaim such beneficial ownership.

(3)fresh perspective.

Based on the share information for The Vanguard Group as of December 31, 2016, reported on Schedule 13G filed by them on February 10, 2017. The Vanguard Group reported sole voting power with respect to 118,019 shares, shared voting power with respect to 6,015 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,477,748 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 121,549 shares.

(4)

Based on

LOGOLOGO

Other Governance Practices

In March 2021, the Board increased the share information for Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC as of December 31, 2016, reported on Schedule 13G filed by them on February 10, 2017. Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC reported sole voting power with respect to 2,134,162 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,211,016 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect none of the shares.

(5)

Based on the share information for T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. as of December 31, 2016, reported on Schedule 13G filed by them on February 7, 2017. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 789,595 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,087,614 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect none of the shares.

(6)

Based on the share information for BlackRock, Inc., as of December 31, 2016, reported on Schedule 13G filed by them on January 19, 2017. BlackRock Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 3,897,592 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,028,295 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to none of the shares.

(7)

Includes 20,962 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

(8)

Includes 170,539 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

(9)

Includes 29,365 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

(10)

Includes 15,726 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

(11)

Includes 4,020 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

(12)

Consists of 10,455 restricted stock units with time-based vesting. Does not include 4,404 restricted stock units with time-based vesting that will not settle until six months after termination of service on the Board.

(13)

Consists of 6,850 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

(14)

Consists of 5,626 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

(15)

Includes 4,020 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

5


(16)

Consists of 10,455 restricted stock units with time-based vesting. Does not include 4,404 restricted stock units with time-based vesting that will not settle until six months after termination of service on the Board.

(17)

Includes 25,220 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and 7,798 restricted stock units with time-based vesting. Does not include 10,678 restricted stock units with time-based vesting that will not settle until six months after termination of service on the Board.

(18)

Does not include 9,694,619 shares of common stock deemed beneficially owned by CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P. as a result of its ownership of the Preferred Stock. By virtue of the relationship described in footnote (2), Mr. Sleeper may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares held by CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P. Mr. Sleeper disclaims such beneficial ownership.

(19)  Consists of 9,455 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5, as applicable, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Officers, directors and shareholders owning more than ten percent of our common stock are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of these forms received or representations from certain reporting persons that no forms were required to be filed, we believe that all of our officers, directors, and greater than ten percent beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.

6


SUMMARY OF BUSINESS MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON

Proposal 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that our Board of Directors shall consist of not less than three members to serve one-year terms of office. The authorized number of directors to twelve (12) to allow for this electionthe appointment of Earl Newsome, Jr.

Each director stands for re-election every year as the Board is set at eleven members. Upon electionnot classified.

The Board reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, diversity, and expertise.

Each director attended over 75% of applicable Board/Committee meetings in fiscal year 2021.

The Board has adopted comprehensive Corporate Governance Guidelines to guide its oversight and leadership.

The Board conducts an annual self-evaluation and an annual evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer.

No stockholder rights plan or “poison pill” has been adopted.

- iii -


Election of Directors (Proposal One)

You will find important information in the Proxy Statement about the qualifications and experience of each of the director nominees listed below whom you are being asked to elect at the 2022 Annual Meeting. The Nominating and Governance Committee performs an annual meeting,assessment to evaluate whether each of Beacon’s directors have the skills and experience to oversee the Company effectively. All of our directors will serve terms expiring atdirector nominees have demonstrated that they have proven leadership ability, sound judgment, integrity and a commitment to the 2019 Annual Meetingsuccess of Shareholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The following individuals are our nominees:Beacon.

Robert R. Buck

Paul M. Isabella

Carl T. Berquist

Richard W. Frost

      
Name  Director
Since
  Age  Independent  Principal Occupation  Beacon Board
Committees

Philip W. Knisely

  2015  67  No  Operating Partner at Clayton,
Dubilier & Rice, LLC
  None

Julian G. Francis

  2019  55  No  President and Chief Executive
Officer of Beacon
  None

Carl T. Berquist

  2016  70  Yes  Former Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial
Officer of Marriott
International, Inc.
  Audit (Chair)

Major General (Ret.) Barbara G. Fast

  2018  68  Yes  Former director of American
Public Education, Inc. and
Chair of Hondros College of
Nursing
  Audit

N&G

Richard W. Frost

  2012  70  Yes  Former Chief Executive
Officer and director of
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
  Compensation

N&G

Alan Gershenhorn

201563YesChairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Logistics
Innovation Technologies
Corp.
Compensation

N&G (Chair)

Robert M. McLaughlin

201664YesFormer Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of
Airgas, Inc.
Audit

Compensation

Earl Newsome, Jr.

202159YesChief Information Officer,
Cummins Inc.
N&G

Neil S. Novich

201267YesFormer Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer
of Ryerson Inc.
Compensation
(Chair)

Stuart A. Randle

200662YesFormer Chief Executive
Officer of Ivenix
N&G

Nathan K. Sleeper

2018

(2015-2016)

48NoChief Executive Officer and
Partner at Clayton, Dubilier &
Rice, LLC
None

Douglas L. Young

201459YesExecutive Vice President of
Lennox International Inc.
Audit

Compensation

Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal Two)

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. While we are not required to have stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor, we are doing so because we believe it is good corporate practice. If our stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment, but may nevertheless retain Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent

- iv -


auditor. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, at its discretion, direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such change is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Approval of Executive Compensation (Proposal Three)

Our Board is requesting stockholder approval of an advisory, non-binding resolution to approve the Company’s executive compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. The Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of the Company’s stockholders and, based on the outcome of this vote, will consider stockholders’ input regarding executive compensation and evaluate whether any action is necessary to address such input.

Submission of Stockholder Proposals or Nominations for 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

In light of the recent change in our fiscal year end from September 30 to December 31, we expect that the timing of our future Annual Meetings of Stockholders will occur three months later as compared to prior years. As a result, we currently anticipate holding our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in May 2023. Stockholders interested in presenting a proposal for consideration at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders may do so by following the procedures prescribed in Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. To be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the meeting, stockholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary at 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170, no later than January 19, 2023.

Notice of stockholder proposals to nominate a person for election as a director or to introduce an item of business at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders outside of Rule 14a-8 must be received by our Corporate Secretary at the above address no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the date on which the notice of such meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of such meeting was made, whichever occurs first. The Company intends to publicly announce a date for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders no earlier than February 8, 2023 in which case such proposals will be due no later than February 18, 2023.

- v -


LOGO

Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.

505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300

Herndon, Virginia 20170

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Friday, February 18, 2022, beginning at 8:00 a.m., local time, at Beacon’s corporate headquarters, 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20170. This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. of proxies from the holders of our common stock, par value $.01 per share, for use at our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) of the annual meeting.

Stockholders of record of our common stock and our Series A Cumulative Participating Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) at the close of business on December 22, 2021, the record date for the meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and to participate in, the annual meeting. If you were a stockholder of record on that date, you will be entitled to vote all of the shares you held on that date at the meeting, or any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) of the meeting. As of the record date, there were 70,426,790 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which are entitled to be voted at the annual meeting. In addition, as of the record date, there were 400,000 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding, all of which are entitled to be voted at the annual meeting. The Preferred Stock is entitled to vote together with the common stock as a single class on each matter to come before the annual meeting, with a number of votes based on the number of shares of common stock into which the Preferred Stock is convertible as of the record date. Accordingly, the 400,000 shares of Preferred Stock are entitled to a total of 9,694,619 votes. As a result, a total of 80,121,409 votes are eligible to be cast at the annual meeting based on the number of outstanding shares of common stock and Preferred Stock as of the record date. A list of our stockholders will be available at our headquarters at 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170 for a period of ten days prior to the annual meeting and at the annual meeting itself for examination by any stockholder.

This Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy are being mailed on or about January 14, 2022. Stockholders should review the information provided in this Proxy Statement in conjunction with our 2021 Annual Report that accompanies this Proxy Statement. In this Proxy Statement, we refer to Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. as “we,” “our” and the “Company.” This Proxy Statement and the 2021 Annual Report are also available to be viewed and downloaded at www.proxydocs.com/BECN.

Purpose of Meeting

At the annual meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters outlined in the notice of meeting on the cover page of this Proxy Statement, consisting of the (1) election of directors; (2) ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022; (3) approval of the compensation of our named executive officers on a non-binding, advisory basis; and (4) any other matters that properly come before the meeting.

Board Recommendations

As more fully discussed under “Summary of Business Matters to be Voted On,” our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the respective nominees for director named in this Proxy Statement; FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022; and FOR approval of the executive compensation.

Unless contrary instructions are indicated on the enclosed proxy, all shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation (and which have not been revoked in accordance with the procedures set forth below) will be voted (1) FOR the

- 1 -


election of the respective nominees for director named in this Proxy Statement; (2) FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022; (3) FOR approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; and (4) in accordance with the recommendation of our Board of Directors, FOR or AGAINST all other matters as may properly come before the annual meeting. In the event a stockholder specifies a different choice by means of the enclosed proxy, such shares will be voted in accordance with the specification made.

Attendance at the Annual Meeting

All of our stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting. In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, no additional guests may attend. Please also note that if you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker or other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date.

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting will be conducted in compliance with any limitations on public gatherings mandated by state and local authorities and other preventive measures recommended by public health experts in effect at the time of the Annual Meeting. These measures are expected to include conducting health screenings for persons seeking entry to the meeting, enforcing optimal social distancing guidelines for all attendees, and requiring all attendees to wear masks. We reserve the right to deny admission to the meeting for persons exhibiting symptoms or behavior that could place our stockholders, employees or facilities at risk. We strongly urge stockholders to vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed pre-addressed envelope as promptly as possible. Submitting a proxy will not prevent you from voting in person, but it will help to secure a quorum, avoid added solicitation costs, and protect the health and safety of our employees, advisors and other stockholders. Information on how to submit a proxy to vote your shares in advance of the meeting is discussed below.

Voting; Quorum

Common Stock. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on each matter that is submitted to stockholders for approval.

Preferred Stock. The holder of the Preferred Stock is entitled to an aggregate of 9,694,619 votes on each matter submitted to stockholders for approval, based on the aggregate number of shares of common stock into which the Preferred Stock is convertible as of the record date. Pursuant to the terms of the investment agreement described under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” the holder of the Preferred Stock has agreed to vote in favor of each director nominated and recommended by the Board of Directors for election at the annual meeting. The holder is entitled to vote in its discretion on the other proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

Quorum. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of common stock and Preferred Stock representing a majority of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of stock on the record date will constitute a quorum, permitting the meeting to conduct its business.

Required Votes

The election of the twelve (12) director nominees named in this Proxy Statement requires the affirmative vote of shares of common stock and Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, representing a plurality of the votes cast for such election at the annual meeting. This means that the twelve (12) director nominees will be elected if they receive more “for” votes than any other person. “Withhold” votes and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast for the foregoing purpose and will have no effect on the election of the nominees.

Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP and approval of the compensation of our named executive officers each requires the affirmative vote of shares of common stock and Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, representing a majority of votes cast on such proposal at the annual meeting (meaning that such number of shares voted “for” such proposal exceeds the number of shares voted “against” such proposal). Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast for the foregoing purpose and will have no effect on the vote for these proposals.

Although our Board of Directors intends to carefully consider the stockholder vote on the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP and the compensation of our named executive officers, such votes will not be binding on us and are advisory in nature.

- 2 -


The inspector of election for the annual meeting shall determine the number of shares of common stock and Preferred Stock represented at the meeting, confirm the existence of a quorum and the validity and effect of proxies, and shall also count and tabulate ballots and votes and determine the results thereof. Proxies received but marked as abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. A “broker non-vote” will occur when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary power with respect to that proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. If less than a majority of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock and Preferred Stock is represented at the annual meeting, the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power so represented may adjourn the annual meeting to another time without further notice.

Effect of Not Voting

If you are a stockholder of record and do not vote by telephone or over the Internet or by completing and returning your proxy card, your shares will not be voted. If you are a beneficial owner and do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares, the question of whether your broker, bank or other nominee will still be able to vote your shares depends on whether Nasdaq deems the particular proposal to be a “routine” matter. Brokers, banks or other nominees can use their discretion to vote “uninstructed” shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine,” but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under the rules and interpretations of the Nasdaq, “non-routine” matters are matters that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of stockholders, such as mergers, stockholder proposals, elections of directors (even if not contested) and executive compensation. Accordingly, your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares on Proposals One and Three but may vote your shares on Proposal Two.

Voting Methods

If you are a holder of record (that is, if your shares are registered in your own name with our transfer agent), you may vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card. Voting instructions for each method are provided on the proxy card contained in the proxy materials.

If you are a participant in the Beacon stock fund under the Beacon 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, you may furnish voting instructions over the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card. Voting instructions for each method are provided on the proxy card contained in the proxy materials.

If you are a street name holder (that is, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record), you must vote in accordance with the voting instruction form provided by your bank, broker or other holder of record. The availability of telephone or internet voting will depend upon your bank’s, broker’s, or other holder of record’s voting process.

If you come to the meeting, you can vote in person. If you are a street name holder and wish to vote at the meeting, you must first obtain a proxy from your bank, broker or other holder of record authorizing you to vote.

Revoking Proxies

The giving of a proxy does not eliminate the right to vote in person should any stockholder giving the proxy so desire. Stockholders have an unconditional right to revoke their proxy at any time prior to the exercise of that proxy, by voting in person at the annual meeting, by filing a written revocation with our Secretary at our headquarters or by submitting a later dated proxy by telephone, over the Internet, or by mail.

Solicitation Costs

The costs of preparing, assembling and mailing this Proxy Statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the enclosed Annual Report and proxy card, along with the cost of posting the proxy materials on a website, are to be borne by us. In addition to the use of mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally and by telephone, e-mail and other electronic means. They will receive no compensation in addition to their regular salaries. We may request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward copies of the proxy material to their principals and to request authority for the execution of proxies. We may reimburse these persons for their expenses in so doing.

- 3 -


SUMMARY OF BUSINESS MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON

PROPOSAL ONE:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that our Board of Directors shall consist of not less than three members. The authorized number of directors for this election is set at twelve (12) members. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board has nominated all twelve (12) of the current members of the Company’s Board, to serve as directors until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified:

Philip W. Knisely

Julian G. Francis

Carl T. Berquist

Barbara G. Fast

Richard W. Frost

Alan Gershenhorn

Robert M. McLaughlin

Earl Newsome, Jr.

Neil S. Novich

Stuart A. Randle

Nathan K. Sleeper

Douglas L. Young

Each nominee has consented to serve as a director; however, in the event that a nominee for a directorship is unable to accept election or if any other unforeseen contingencies should arise, it is intended that proxies will be voted for the remaining nominees, if any, and for such other person as may be designated by the Board of Directors, unless it is directed by a proxy to do otherwise. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve. Except as indicated in this Proxy Statement, there are no arrangements or understandings between any of the nominees and any other person pursuant to which such nominees were selected.

Our Company has grown rapidly through organic growth and acquisitions to become the largest publicly traded distributor of residential and non-residential roofing materials and complementary building products in the United States and Canada, operating branches in all 50 U.S. states and six Canadian provinces. Accordingly, our nominees have experience in a variety of areas important to our Company, such as managing and overseeing the management of large public and private companies (including distribution companies), corporate governance and executive compensation, strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, procuring financing to grow the business, international operations, cybersecurity, information technology and marketing, and experience in our industry. Our Nominating and Governance Committee and Board believe that these nominees provide us with the range and depth of experience and capabilities needed to effectively oversee the management of our Company. In addition, we believe our directors complement each other well and together comprise a cohesive unit in terms of Board process and collaboration.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF
EACH NOMINEE AS DIRECTOR.

- 4 -


INFORMATION ABOUT OUR NOMINEES

The following information sets forth, as of December 22, 2021, certain information about our nominees. There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers. The Company believes in serving its stockholders through representation on the Board that ensures oversight of the Company, as well as implementation of the strategic plan and business model. The Nominating and Governance Committee, on behalf of the entire Board, reviews not only the personal qualities and characteristics in a Board member or potential candidate, but also the individual’s diverse education, business and cultural background.

PHILIP W. KNISELY

Chair, Not Independent

LOGO

Director since: October 2015

Age: 67

Committees: None

Mr. Knisely was appointed non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors unless it is directed byin February 2020. He became an operating partner at Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (“CD&R”), a proxyprivate equity firm, in 2019, and prior to do otherwise.

Our Company has grown rapidly through internal growththat, served as an advisor to CD&R since 2011. He currently serves as Chairman of both CD&R Hydra Holdings, Inc. (parent entity of SunSource Holdings, Inc.), a privately held power distribution company, and acquisitions to become the largest publicly tradedWhite Cap, a $4 billion privately owned distributor of residential and non-residential roofing materialsconcrete accessories and complementary building products, inand is a former Chairman of Roofing Supply Group, LLC (“RSG”). He also serves on the United Statesboard of Carestream Dental, a privately held provider of dental imaging equipment and Canada, operating branches in all 50 U.S. states and in six Canadian provinces. Accordingly, our nominees have experience insoftware. He previously served on the board of Atkore International Group Inc. Mr. Knisely spent a variety of areas important to our Company, suchdecade as managing and overseeing the management of large public and private companies, corporate governance and executive compensation, strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, financing growing businesses, international operations, information technology and marketing, and experience in our industry. Our NominatingExecutive Vice President and Corporate Governance CommitteeOfficer of Danaher Corporation, where he was responsible for businesses totaling more than $4 billion in sales. Prior to Danaher, Mr. Knisely co-founded Colfax Corporation, a designer, manufacturer, and Board believe that these nominees provide us with the range and depthdistributor of experience and capabilities needed to effectively oversee the management of our Company. In addition, we believe our directors complement each other well and together comprise a cohesive unit in terms of Board process and collaboration.

Information about Our Nominees

The following information sets forth, as of December 18, 2017, certain information about our nominees (age is in parentheses after each name). Unless otherwise indicated, each person has been engaged in the principal occupation shown for the past five years. There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers. The Board has determined that each of the following directors is independent under Nasdaq listing standards: Carl T. Berquist, Richard W. Frost, Alan Gershenhorn, Robert M. McLaughlin, Neil S. Novich, Stuart A. Randle, and Douglas L. Young. Independent members of our Board shall meet in executive session at least two times a year.

Robert R. Buck (70) — Chairman. Mr. Buck joined usfluid handling products, where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director in October 2003 andOfficer. Previously, Mr. Knisely was appointed as Chairman of the Board in March 2007. Prior to joining us, he served as President — Uniform Rental Division of Cintas Corporation from 1997 to 2003. From 1991 through 1997, he served as Senior Vice President — Midwest Region of Cintas. From 1982 through 1991, he served as Senior Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Cintas. Mr. Buck presently serves on the Boards of Multi-Color Corporation and Quanex Building Products Corporation, both publicly-traded companies, and Elkay Manufacturing.

7


Mr. Buck has overseen the growth of the Company from a private company with 65 branches and approximately $600 million in annual sales to a public company with 383 branches as of September 30, 2017 and $4.4 billion in sales in fiscal year 2017. His continued leadership as Chairman of the Board will be a major advantage to the Company and the Board as we continue to grow and make planned acquisitions.

Paul M. Isabella (62) President and Chief Executive Officer.Officer of AMF Industries, a privately held diversified manufacturer, and spent ten years at Emerson Electric. He has previously served on the board of trustees of the Darden School Foundation at the University of Virginia, where he received his MBA. Mr. Isabella joined usKnisely was also a GM Fellowship Scholar at General Motors Institute, where he earned a BS in November 2007industrial engineering.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Knisely’s tenure as Chairman of RSG gave him in-depth knowledge of the building products industry. Mr. Knisely has extensive experience in business strategy and operations, which is helpful as we look to expand our available products and pursue additional growth opportunities. Mr. Knisely is a director nominee designated by CD&R pursuant to the terms of the investment agreement described under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

JULIAN G. FRANCIS

President and CEO, Not

Independent

LOGO

Director since: August 2019

Age: 55

Committees: None

Mr. Francis has served as Beacon’s President and Chief Operating Officer and was promoted to Chief Executive Officer in January 2011. Mr. Isabella also became a director in February 2011.since August 2019. Prior to joining us, he served as Executive ViceBeacon, Mr. Francis was the President of Cooper Industries from 2005the Insulation Business at Owens Corning, a global leader in insulation, roofing and fiberglass composite materials, since October 2014. Mr. Francis led Owens Corning’s largest business segment, with over $2.7 billion in revenue in 2018, to 2007significant sales and Senior Vice President of Stanley Works from 1999 to 2005. He began his career with General Electric Company in 1977 and worked in various GE businesses for 22 years. Mr. Isabella has a B.S. degree from State University of New York at Cortland.

Mr. Isabella led the Company to record sales inEBIT growth in each of the preceding three years. From 2012-2014, he served as Vice President and General Manager for Owens Corning’s Residential Insulation Business. Mr. Francis also has served as Vice President and Managing Director for Owens Corning’s Glass Reinforcements, Americas, in the Composite Solutions Business. Prior to joining Owens Corning, Mr. Francis was Vice President and Publishing Director at Reed Business Information, a $2.5 billion global leader in publishing, information, and marketing services. Prior to joining Reed, Mr. Francis spent 10 years at USG Corporation rising through the marketing, strategy, and general management ranks. He last three fiscalserved as Vice President, Marketing, where he created the overall strategy for USG’s $3.3 billion manufacturing business. Mr. Francis earned his bachelor’s degree in mathematics and his doctorate in materials engineering at Swansea University in the United Kingdom and earned his MBA at DePaul University.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Francis has over 20 years ledof experience in the successful integrationbuilding materials industry, with a unique blend of multiple acquisitions,executive and has formed an effective organizational structure to facilitate future growth.operational experience. We believe that it is important that the CEOChief Executive Officer be an integral part of our Board’s decision-making process.

- 5 -


Carl

CARL T. Berquist (66) — BERQUIST

Independent

LOGO

Director since: June 2016

Age: 70

Committees: Audit (Chair)

Mr. Berquist has served as a director since June 2016. He is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marriott International, Inc., a leading global lodging company, having served in that position from 2009 until his retirement in 2015. Mr. Berquist joined Marriott in 2002 after a 28-year career with Arthur Andersen LLP, where he held numerous leadership positions including managing partner of the worldwide real-estatereal estate and hospitality practice. He currently serves on the board of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., a publicly traded restaurant/gift shop chain. Mr. Berquist previously served for ten years on the Boardboard of Hertz Global Holdings. HeHoldings, Inc., and is a member of the Board of Advisors offormer advisor to Eberle Communications, a private direct mail company. He is a graduate of the Penn State University, where he is a member of the Board of Advisors of both the Business School and the School of Hospitality Management.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Berquist’sBerquist has extensive experience in executive finance roles with Marriott and public accounting will be verythat are helpful to the Board and management as the Company continueswe continue to implement operational efficiencies and its acquisitionexecute our growth strategy.

Richard W. Frost (66) — Mr. Frost has served

MAJOR GENERAL (RET.)

BARBARA G. FAST

Independent

LOGO

Director since: October 2018

Age: 68

Committees: Audit, N&G

Major General Fast is currently a strategic advisor for both the Sierra Nevada Corporation, a privately held aerospace engineering firm, and Axellio, Inc., a small privately-owned network and storage company. In addition, she provides consulting services to, and serves as a director of, Radiance Technologies, Inc., a privately held firm that provides engineering services. Major General Fast was a director of publicly traded American Public Education, Inc. (“APEI”), a for-profit education company, from 2009 to 2021, serving as Chairperson for five of those years. She also served as Chairperson of APEI’s subsidiary Hondros College of Nursing from 2016 to 2021. She also previously served as Senior Vice President, Strategic Engagements for CGI Federal, an IT and consulting services firm, from June 2014 to September 2016. Prior to that, she was Senior Vice President, Army Defense and Intelligence Programs and Vice President of Operations and Intelligence for CGI Federal. She also previously served as the Vice President, Cyber and Information Solutions for The Boeing Company, a leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners and defense, space, and security systems. Major General Fast retired from the U.S. Army in 2008 after over 32 years of service during which she held a variety of key command and staff positions. Major General Fast holds a Bachelor of Science in Education (German and Spanish) from the University of Missouri, a Master of Science in Business Administration from Boston University, and an Honorary Doctorate of Laws from Central Missouri State University. She is also a graduate of the Army War College.

Director Qualifications: Major General Fast’s unique cybersecurity expertise, deep public company executive and corporate governance experience, and tremendous leadership skills developed over her long and distinguished military and private sector careers are valuable assets as we move forward with our growth initiatives, particularly our leading e-commerce platform.

- 6 -


RICHARD W. FROST

Independent

LOGO

Director since: July 2012. He2012

Age: 70

Committees: Comp., N&G

Mr. Frost retired as Chief Executive Officer and a director of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, a manufacturer of building materials, in May 2012, having served in those capacities since December 2004. Mr. Frost previously served as that company’s Executive Vice President, Commodity Products, Procurement and Engineering from March 2003 to November 2004; Executive Vice President, OSB, Procurement and Engineering from May 2002 to February 2003; and Vice President, Timberlands and Procurement from 1996 to April 2002. Mr. Frost currently serves on the Boardboard of privately held Westervelt, Inc. and previously served on the Board of Tractor Supply Company, the largest operator of retail farm and ranch stores in the United States with over 1,200 stores in 45 states.States. Mr. Frost holds dual bachelor’s degrees from Louisiana State University and an M.B.A.,MBA, Finance from Northwestern State University of Louisiana.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Frost’sFrost has both executive and director experience, including deep operational experience in the building products industry, and success in growth situations and with acquisitions, will be verywhich is helpful to the Board and management as the Company lookswe look to expand itsour available products and pursue aggressive acquisition growth.additional growth opportunities.

Alan Gershenhorn (59) — 

ALAN GERSHENHORN

Independent

LOGO

Director since: May 2015

Age: 63

Committees: Comp., N&G (Chair)

Mr. Gershenhorn hasis currently the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Logistics Innovation Technologies Corp., a publicly traded special purpose acquisition company focusing on opportunities in the global logistics industry. Mr. Gershenhorn previously served as a director since May 2015. He currently serves asthe Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), the world’s largest package delivery company.company, through June 2018. At UPS, Mr. Gershenhorn directsdirected strategy, mergers and acquisitions, marketing, sales, product and solution development, customer experience management,public affairs, communications, and key growth strategies globally across UPS. Since 2007, Mr. Gershenhorn has beenthe organization. He served as a member of the UPS Management Committee, which directs theglobal strategy and the day-to-day operations, offor over a decade, and led numerous transformational programs during his 39-year tenure. Mr. Gershenhorn previously served in several significant UPS globally. He joinedleadership positions with both global and regional responsibilities in the U.S., Europe, and Canada, including Chief Sales and Marketing Officer, Senior Vice President and President UPS in 1979 and has held other various US and international positions of increasing responsibility in operations, engineering, freight forwarding, logistics, customs brokerage, marketing, strategy, and retail operations includingInternational; President UPS Supply Chain Solutions Global Transportation and Shared Services; President Supply Chain Solutions Europe, Asia, Middle East and Africa; and President UPS Canada. Mr. Gershenhorn serves on the board of publicly traded Cargojet, Canada’s leading provider of time sensitive premium air cargo services. He also currently serves on the boards of Transportation Insight, OTR Capital and Ascend Transport Group, which are privately held enterprise logistics companies, and acts in an advisory role to 8VC, a venture capital firm. Mr. Gershenhorn holds a degree in finance from the University of Houston.

8


Director Qualifications: Mr. Gershenhorn’sGershenhorn has extensive operational and functional experience, particularly in supply chain, logistics, e-commerce, marketing and strategy will beand marketing, which is extremely valuable for the Company’sour planned growth and development of new and more efficient ways to serve itsour customers.

Philip W. Knisely (63) — Mr. Knisely has served as a director

- 7 -


ROBERT M. MCLAUGHLIN

Independent

LOGO

Director since October 2015. He has been an operating advisor to Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (“CD&R”), a private equity firm, since 2011. He is currently Chairman of Atkore International, a leading designer, manufacturer and distributor of electrical and metal products, and former Chairman of RSG. Mr. Knisely spent a decade as Executive Vice President and Corporate Officer of Danaher Corporation, where he was responsible for businesses totaling more than $4 billion in sales. Prior to Danaher, Mr. Knisely co-founded Colfax Corporation, a designer, manufacturer, and distributer of fluid handling products, serving as President and Chief Executive Officer. Previously, Mr. Knisely was President and Chief Executive Officer of AMF Industries, a privately held diversified manufacturer, and spent ten years at Emerson Electric. He serves on the board of trustees of the Darden School Foundation at the University of Virginia, where he received his M.B.A. Mr. Knisely was also a GM Fellowship Scholar at General Motors Institute, where he earned a B.S. in industrial engineering.: June 2016

Age: 64

Committees: Audit, Comp.

Mr. Knisely’s tenure as Chairman of RSG gives him in-depth knowledge of the building products industry. Mr. Knisely has extensive experience in business strategy, operations and growth through acquisitions, which will be helpful to the Board and management as the Company looks to expand its available products and pursue acquisition growth. Commencing January 2, 2018, Mr. Knisley was designated a director nominee by CD&R pursuant to the terms of the investment agreement described under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions – Investment Agreement and Preferred Stock Terms.”

Robert M. McLaughlin (60) — Mr. McLaughlin has served as a director since June 2016. He is the former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Airgas, Inc., the nation’s leading single-source supplier of gases, welding and safety products. Mr. McLaughlin served in that position from 2006 until his retirement in 2016, after serving as Airgas’s Vice President and Controller since joining Airgas in 2001. Previously, he was Vice President-Finance for Asbury Automotive Group, a multi-billion dollarmultibillion-dollar automotive retailer, after serving as Vice President of Finance and in other financial management roles with Unisource Worldwide, Inc., a multi-billion dollarmultibillion-dollar international paper and industrial supply distribution company. Prior to Unisource, he had a thirteen yearthirteen-year career with Ernst & Young. Mr. McLaughlin serves on the Boardboard of Directors of publicly-tradedpublicly traded Axalta Coating Systems Ltd., a global leader in the development, manufacture and sale of liquid and powder coatings. Hecoatings, where he is the chairman of their audit committee and also serves on their compensation committee. Mr. McLaughlin earned his bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Dayton.

Director Qualifications: Mr. McLaughlin’s deep experience as a senior executive in financial management for multi-billion dollarmultibillion-dollar distribution firms will be helpfulprovides value as we pursue additional growth opportunities.

EARL NEWSOME, JR.

Independent

LOGO

Director since: March 2021

Age: 59

Committees: N&G

Mr. Newsome is currently Chief Information Officer of Cummins Inc., a $23.6 billion global power leader that designs, manufactures, sells, and services diesel and alternative fuel engines. Previously, he served as Chief Information Officer, Americas IT for Linde PLC, a $28 billion global industrial gases and engineering firm formed by the merger of Linde and Praxair, Inc. until March 2021. Prior to the Board and management as the Company pursues its growth goals and acquisition strategy.

Neil S. Novich (63) — Mr. Novich hasmerger, he served as Global Chief Information Officer and Vice President of Praxair from May 2016 to March 2019. Mr. Newsome currently serves on the board of First Independence Bank and First Independence Corporation, a directorbank and related bank holding company, and Navisite, a managed cloud service provider. Prior to joining Praxair, he was Corporate Chief Information Officer and Vice President, Digital at TE Connectivity, a producer of highly engineered connectivity and sensing products, where he built a world-class IT organization that accelerated each business unit’s success. Mr. Newsome also previously served as Vice President, Global IT Services at Estée Lauder, where he transformed the Shared Services organization into a global team and established its Global Innovation Lab, and as Senior Director, Strategy and Integration and Global Operations, for Bowne & Co., where he directed the M&A strategy of the digital business unit and managed global operations. Earlier in his career, Mr. Newsome served as VP and Chief Information Officer of Owens-Illinois and was Partner at Deloitte & Touche. Mr. Newsome was Captain in the U.S. Army and received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the United States Military Academy at West Point.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Newsome’s strategic vision and broad IT expertise will help us align technology with business requirements as we move to accelerate our growth initiatives, particularly our leading e-commerce platform.

- 8 -


NEIL S. NOVICH

Independent

LOGO

Director since: July 2012. He2012

Age: 67

Committees: Comp. (Chair)

Mr. Novich is the former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ryerson Inc., a global metals distributor and fabricator. He joined Ryerson in 1994 as Chief Operating Officer, was named President and CEOChief Executive Officer in 1995, and was additionally appointed Chairman in 1999. He remained Chairman and CEOChief Executive Officer until 2007, when the company was sold. Prior to his time at Ryerson, heMr. Novich spent 13 years with Bain & Company, an international management consulting firm, where he was a partner. Mr. Novich currently serves on the boards of publicly traded Hillenbrand, Inc., Analog Devices, Inc.,a global diversified industrial company, where he is chairman of the audit committee and a member of the nominating and corporate governance and mergers and acquisitions committees, and W.W. Grainger, Inc., an industrial supplies and equipment provider, where he is a member of the audit, board affairs, nominating and cyber ad hoc committees. He was formerly a director of publicly traded Analog Devices, Inc. Mr. Novich has a bachelor’s degree in physics from Harvard University and master’s degrees in both nuclear engineering and management from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Novich understands the critical success factors for executive management of a public corporation. He has excellent financial knowledge and extensive board and managerial experience, including many years as a chairman.

Stuart

STUART A. Randle (58)RANDLE

Lead Independent Director

LOGO

Director since: Feb. 2006

Age: 62

Committees: N&G

In 2019, Mr. Randle has servedretired from his role as a director since February 2006. Mr. Randle presently serves as CEOthe Chief Executive Officer of Ivenix, a privately held medical technology company. He also is a director of Teleflex Inc.,Incorporated, a publicly traded provider of specialty medical devices, where he isserves as chairman of its nominating & governance committee and a member of its Governance Committee, and Lead Independent Directorcompensation committee. He previously served as a director of Flex Pharma, Inc., a publicly traded biotechnology company Flex Pharma, Inc.that merged with Salarius Pharmaceuticals in 2019. From 2004 to 2014, Mr. Randle served as President, CEOChief Executive Officer and director of GI Dynamics, a healthcare company. Previously, Mr. Randle was an Entrepreneur-in-Residence for Advanced Technology Ventures, a healthcare and IT venture capital firm. From 1998 to 2001, he was President, CEOChief Executive Officer and a director of Act

9


Medical, Inc., and prior to that spent a combined ten years with Baxter Healthcare and its spin-off, Allegiance, in a variety of senior roles, including six years in the distribution business. Mr. Randle holds a BS in mechanical engineering from Cornell University and an MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Randle’s executive and director experience, including success in growth situations, and with acquisitions, is a valuable asset for the Board and management as the Company moves forward with its planned continued growth.we continue to execute our growth strategy.

Nathan

NATHAN K. Sleeper (44) — Mr. Sleeper hasSLEEPER

Not Independent

LOGO

Director since: Jan. 2018 (also served as a director since January 2, 2018. He previously served as a director from OctoberOct. 2015 until��� May 2016. 2016)

Age: 48

Committees: None

Mr. Sleeper is a partner of CD&R.&R, and on January 1, 2020 he became CD&R’s chief executive officer. He leads CD&R’s investment activity in the industrial sector and seversserves on its Investment and Management Committees. Mr. Sleeper is currently a director of Atkore International Group,publicly traded Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. (formerly Ply Gem Industries, Inc.) and Core & Main, Inc., as well as Multi-Color Corporation, Brand Energy & Infrastructure,Industrial Holdings, Inc., CHC Group Ltd., Hussmann International,PowerTeam Services Holdco, LLC, CD&R Hydra Holdings, Inc., NCI Building Systems, Inc. and Wilsonart International Holdings, LLC. He previously served on the boards of Culliganpublicly traded Atkore International Group Inc., HD Supply Holdings, Inc., and Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., as well as CHC Group, Ltd., Culligan International Company, Hussmann Parent, Inc., and US Food,Foods, Inc. Prior to joining CD&R in 2000, Mr. Sleeper worked for Goldman Sachs & Co, and Tiger Management. Mr. Sleeper holds a bachelor’s degree from WilliamWilliams College and an M.B.AMBA from Harvard Business School.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Sleeper’s broad experience in the financial and investment communities brings to our Board important insights into business strategy.strategy to our Board. Mr. Sleeper is a director nominee designated by CD&R pursuant to the terms of the investment agreement described under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions – Investment Agreement and Preferred Stock Terms.Transactions.

Douglas

- 9 -


DOUGLAS L. Young (55) — Mr. Young became a director in October 2014. YOUNG

Independent

LOGO

Director since: Oct. 2014

Age: 59

Committees: Audit, Comp.

Mr. Young is Executive Vice President of Lennox International Inc., a global leader in the climate control industry. Mr. Young joined Lennox in 1999 and since 2006 has served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Lennox’s Residential Heating and Cooling Segment. Mr. Young had previously served as Vice President & General Manager of North American Residential Products since 2003 and as Vice President & General Manager of Lennox North American Residential Sales, Marketing, & Distribution from 1999 – 2003.1999-2003. Prior to his career with Lennox, Mr. Young was employed in the Appliances division of GE, where he held various management positions before serving as General Manager of Marketing for GE Appliance division’s retail group from 1997 – 19991997-1999 and as General Manager of Strategic Initiatives in 1999. He holds a BSBA from Creighton University and an MS in Management from Purdue University.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Young’s executive experience is a valuable resource to the Board on issues involving sales, marketing, finance, product development, distribution and compensation.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of the nominees.

10


Proposal 2.

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018 (“fiscal 2018”).

The Board and the Audit Committee consider Ernst & Young LLP well qualified to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and recommend ratification of such selection by the shareholders.

Although action by shareholders for this matter is not required, the Board and the Audit Committee believe that it is appropriate to seek shareholder ratification of the selection in order to provide our shareholders with a means of communicating their level of satisfaction with the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm and its level of independence from management. If the proposal is not approved and the selection of Ernst & Young LLP is not ratified by our shareholders, the Audit Committee will take this into consideration and will reconsider the appointment.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the retention of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our 2018 fiscal year.

- 10 -


 

11


Proposal 3.

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Company is presenting the following proposal, which gives you, as a shareholder, an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers by voting for or against the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosure contained in the accompanying proxy statement.”

This resolution is required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act. Although our Board of Directors intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature. The current frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation is annually. The next vote on executive compensation is expected to occur at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Our Company has grown rapidly through internal growth and acquisitions to become the largest publicly traded distributor of residential and non-residential roofing materials and complementary building products in the United States and Canada, operating branches in all 50 U.S. states and in six Canadian provinces. We believe our past accomplishments, including consistent profitability and growth, support the effectiveness of our executive pay program, which is intended to attract, motivate and retain experienced and skilled executives. We also believe the program provides the named executive officers listed in our summary compensation table with compensation that is competitive within our industry, internally equitable and commensurate with their talents and responsibilities. The primary objective of the program is to closely align total executive compensation with the attainment of our annual and long-term performance goals. The compensation of our executive officers consists of base salary, cash bonuses, long-term incentive compensation in the form of Company stock options and stock awards, and certain perquisites such as an auto allowance and fuel reimbursement. Cash bonuses are linked to quantitative and qualitative performance objectives. Most of the target cash bonuses for which our executives are eligible are linked directly to Company quantitative performance in accordance with the terms of the cash incentive program.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers.

12


BOARD OF DIRECTORS’DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS,

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD AND RELATED MATTERS

How often did

Director Independence

The Board has determined that each of the current Company directors, with the exceptions of Philip W. Knisely, Julian G. Francis and Nathan K. Sleeper, is “independent” under Nasdaq listing standards and the rules of the SEC. Messrs. Knisely, Sleeper and Francis are not independent due to Messrs. Knisely’s and Sleeper’s relationship with CD&R, our largest stockholder, and Mr. Francis’ service as our President and Chief Executive Officer. We believe we comply with all applicable requirements of Nasdaq and the SEC relating to director independence and the composition of the committees of our Board.

Board Committees and Meetings

Our Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. Each such committee operates under a formal charter that governs its duties and conduct. A copy of each committee’s charter and the Company’s governance guidelines are available on our website at www.becn.com. In addition, each committee’s charter and the Company’s governance guidelines are available in print to any stockholder who requests it in writing to our Corporate Secretary at Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170.

NameAudit CommitteeCompensation Committee
Nominating and Governance
Committee

Philip W. Knisely*

Julian G. Francis

Carl T. BerquistO

C

Major General (Ret.) Barbara G. Fast

Richard W. Frost

Alan Gershenhorn

C

Robert M. McLaughlinO

Earl Newsome, Jr.

Neil S. Novich

C

Stuart A. Randle†

Nathan K. Sleeper

Douglas L. Young

Member

C

Chair

O

Audit Committee Financial Expert

*

Chair of the Board meet during fiscal year 2017?

During fiscal year 2017, our Lead Independent Director

Each director serving on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and/or Nominating and Governance Committee are independent under Nasdaq listing standards (as adopted under SEC rules). Each director serving on the Audit Committee meets the independence criteria prescribed by applicable law and the rules of the SEC for Audit Committee membership and meets Nasdaq’s financial knowledge requirements. The Board has determined that Messrs. Berquist and McLaughlin are “audit committee financial experts” as such term is defined in Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. Further, each director serving on the Compensation Committee is a non-employee director (as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act), does not have “interlocking” or other relationships with us that would detract from their independence as committee members, and is an outside director (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code).

- 11 -


The table below shows the number of Board and Committee meetings held in fiscal year 2021.

Number of
Meetings Held

Board of Directors held eight meetings. No incumbent director attended fewer than 75 percent of the aggregate of (i) the number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period he or she served on the Board and (ii) the number of meetings of committees of the Board of Directors held during the period he or she served on these committees. All of our Board members attended the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person. It is our policy for all directors to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

What is the Board’s leadership structure?

Robert Buck serves as the Chairman of the Board and remains a member of executive management. Furthermore, our current CEO, Paul Isabella, was elected to the Board in February 2011. The Board believes that this leadership model is appropriate for the following reasons:

these roles enable decisive leadership, ensure clear accountability and foster alignment between the Board and management on corporate strategy;

our Board has adopted strong and effective corporate governance policies and procedures to promote the effective and independent governance of the Company (See “Corporate Governance” and “Employee Code of Business Ethics and Conduct”);

our independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present; and

in determining the appropriate leadership structure, the Board considered a number of factors, including the candor and dynamics of discussion among the directors and between directors and management and the effectiveness of Mr. Buck’s leadership of the Board to date.

Because our Chairman of the Board is not considered an independent director, our Board has elected a Lead Independent Director. Stuart Randle currently serves as the Board’s Lead Independent Director, and the responsibilities of this position include the following:

preside at meetings of the Board’s independent directors;

assign certain tasks to the Board’s committees from time to time;

recommend agenda items and times for Board meetings; and

perform such other functions as the Board may direct.

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board, which is the Company’s ultimate decision-making body, except with respect to those matters reserved to our shareholders. Our Board’s key mission is to maximize long-term shareholder value. Our Board establishes our overall corporate policies, selects and evaluates our executive management team (which is charged with the conduct of our business), and acts as an advisor and counselor to executive management. Our Board also oversees our business strategy and planning, as well as the performance of management in executing its business strategy and assessing and managing risks.

What is the Board’s role in risk oversight?

The Board takes an active role in monitoring and assessing the Company’s risks, which include risks associated with operations, credit, financing, cybersecurity, and capital investments. Management is responsible for the Company’s day-to-day risk management activities and our Board’s role is to engage in informed risk oversight. Our Board members also complete the Company’s risk assessment survey. Management, through its internal audit function, compiles an annual ranking of risks to which the Company could be subjected. Our Director of Internal Audit reviews the results of this risk assessment with the Audit Committee. Any significant risks are then reviewed by the Board and assigned for oversight. In fulfilling this oversight role, our Board focuses on understanding the nature of our enterprise risks, including our operations and strategic direction, as well as the adequacy of our risk

13


management process and overall risk management system. There are a number of ways our Board performs this function, including the following:

at its regularly scheduled meetings, the Board receives management updates on our business operations, financial results and strategy and discusses risks related to the business;

the Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of risk management by discussing with management, particularly the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our guidelines and policies regarding financial and enterprise risk management and risk appetite, including major risk exposures, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; the Audit Committee also receives regular reports from the Company’s Chief Information Officer on cybersecurity risk management; and

through management updates and committee reports, the Board monitors our risk management activities, including the annual risk assessment process, risks relating to our compensation programs, and financial and operational risks being managed by the Company.

The Compensation Committee also has oversight responsibility for risks and exposures related to employee compensation programs and management succession planning, and assesses whether the organization’s compensation practices encourage risk taking that would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The committee periodically reviews the structure and elements of our compensation programs and its policies and practices that manage or mitigate such risk, including the balance of short-term and long-term incentives, use of multiple performance measures, and a multi-year vesting schedule for long-term incentives. Based on these reviews, the committee believes our compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk taking.

Are Board members subject to a retirement age?

No person shall be nominated by the Board to serve as a director after he or she has passed his or her 72nd birthday, unless the Nominating and Governance Committee has voted, on an annual basis, to waive the mandatory retirement age for such director.

Do Board members receive orientation training and continuing development education?

All new directors are required to participate in an orientation program, which includes the introduction of the new directors to the Company’s principal officers and presentations by senior management to familiarize new directors with the Company’s strategic plans and business units. The Board has adopted a Director Education Program and will conduct at least one continuing professional development program for all Board members each year. In addition, continuing professional development opportunities for all other directors will be conducted through the Company’s regular Board meetings and Board meeting materials; periodic Board or Board committee presentations by the Company’s officers concerning the Company’s strategies, business plans, management structure and significant financial, accounting and risk management issues; Board or Board committee presentations by outside parties; and other professional development opportunities, if appropriate and relevant to the duties of a director of the Company, including presentations and educational programs offered by various outside organizations, with appropriate expenses paid by the Company.

What committees has the Board established?

The Board of Directors has established three committees: (1) the Audit Committee, (2) the Compensation Committee and (3) the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

16

Audit Committee

9

The Audit Compensation Committee

9

Nominating and Governance Committee

5

It is our policy for all directors to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, unless attendance is not feasible owing to unavoidable circumstances, which this year may include the ongoing pandemic. No incumbent director attended fewer than 75 percent of the aggregate of (i) the number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period he or she served on the Board and (ii) the number of committee meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period he or she served on these committees. All of the then serving Board members attended the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

  CommitteeCommittee held eight meetings in fiscal year 2017. The Audit Committee assists the Board in monitoring:Function

Audit:

Carl Berquist, Chair

Barbara Fast

Robert McLaughlin

Douglas Young

•   Monitors management’s process for ensuring the integrity of our financial statements;statements and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

•   Oversees the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm (currently Ernst & Young LLP);

•   Selects the independent registered public accounting firm and receives reports directly from the independent registered public accounting firm;

•   Reviews the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence;

14


the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; and

management’s process for ensuring our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

As a key part of its responsibilities above, the Audit Committee selects the independent registered public accounting firm, approves•   Approves the scope of the annual audit activities of the independent registered public accounting firm approvesand the audit fee payable to the independent registered public accounting firm and reviewsfirm;

•   Reviews audit results with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee currently is composed of Carl Berquist, Robert McLaughlinfirm; and Douglas Young, each of whom meets

•   Monitors the independence criteria prescribed by applicable lawCompany’s Enterprise Risk Management, including but not limited to, issues relating to cybersecurity and the rules of the SEC for Audit Committee membershipfraud detection and is independent under Nasdaq listing standards. The Board has also determined that Mr. Berquist is an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. Each of Messrs. Berquist, McLaughlin and Young meet Nasdaq’s financial knowledge requirements. Mr. Berquist currently serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Ernst & Young LLP currently serves as our independent registered public accounting firm.prevention.

The Audit Committee operates under a formal charter that governs its duties and conduct. The Audit Committee charter complies with applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations. A copy of the charter is available on our web site at www.becn.com. In addition, the charter is available in print to any shareholder who requests it in writing to our Chief Financial Officer at Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170.

Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, reports directly to the Audit Committee.

Please refer to the Report of the Audit Committee, Report, which is set forth in this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, for a further description of our Audit Committee’s responsibilities and its recommendation with respect to our audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2017.2021.

Compensation Committee

Compensation:

The Compensation Committee held five meetings in fiscal year 2017. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviewsNeil Novich, Chair

Richard Frost

Alan Gershenhorn

Robert McLaughlin

Douglas Young

•   Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding cashthe compensation of the Chief Executive Officer;

•   Reviews the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations on, and non-equity benefitsapproves the compensation of, executive officers and key employees of the Company. The Compensation Committee also administersCompany;

•   Administers and makes awards under the Company’s stock plan. Oneplan;

•   Approves the design and administration of the key duties ofannual cash incentive plan for the Compensationexecutive committee members, including the named executive officers;

- 12 -


  Committee is to provideCommittee Function

•   Provides a general review of our compensation and benefit plans to ensure that they meet our objectives. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer as well as the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations on compensation of our executive officers and makesobjectives;

•   Makes recommendations for adopting and changing major compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committeepractices; and

•   Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of non-employee directors and reports its recommendations for cash and non-equity compensation to the full Board of Directors for approval and authorization. The Compensation Committee is composed of directors who are independent under Nasdaq listing standards (as adopted under SEC rules) and non-employee directors (as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act) and who do not have “interlocking” or other relationships with us that would detract from their independence as committee members. At all times, at least two members of the committee shall be outside directors (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code). The current members of the Compensation Committee are Neil Novich, Richard Frost, and Alan Gershenhorn, each of whom is independent under Nasdaq listing standards. Mr. Novich currently serves as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee operates under a formal charter that governs its duties and conduct. The Compensation Committee complies with applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations. A copy of the charter is available on our web site at www.becn.com. In addition, the charter is available in print to any shareholder who requests it in writing to our Chief Financial Officer at Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170.

Please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the Report of the Compensation Committee Report in this proxy statementProxy Statement for a further description of our Compensation Committee’s responsibilities, as well as its compensation philosophy, its engagement of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. as its independent compensation consultant, and a description of considerations underlying each component of compensation paid to Beacon’s named executive officers for fiscal year 2017.2021.

15


Nominating and Corporate Governance CommitteeGovernance:

The NominatingAlan Gershenhorn, Chair

Barbara Fast

Richard Frost

Earl Newsome

Stuart Randle

•   Identifies and Corporate Governance Committee held five meetings in fiscal year 2017. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommendingrecommends potential candidates qualified to become Board members, recommendingincluding overseeing Beacon’s commitment to recruit diverse candidates to serve on the Board;

•   Recommends directors for appointment to Board committees, establishingcommittees;

•   Oversees governance of the Company’s corporate social responsibility, safety, and maintainingenvironmental practices and makes periodic reports to the Board regarding such practices;

•   Establishes and maintains compliance with corporate governance guidelines,guidelines; and reporting

•   Reports to the Board of Directors on the Board’s self-evaluation questionnaire. The Nominatingprocess and Corporate Governance Committee is currently composed of Richard Frost, Alan Gershenhorn, Stuart Randle and Douglas Young, each of whom is independent under Nasdaq listing standards. Mr. Frost currently serves as the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.results.

When identifying, evaluating and considering potential candidates for membership on our Board, including those who might be recommended or nominated by our shareholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers among other factors, relevant business and financial experience, integrity and willingness to devote the necessary time and energy. Although the Company’s corporate governance guidelines do not prescribe specific diversity standards, as a matter of practice, the Board considers diversity in the context of the Board as a whole and takes into account considerations relating to ethnicity, gender, cultural diversity and the range of perspectives that the directors bring to their work. Our Board seeks independent directors with a broad diversity of experience, professions, skills, geographic representation and backgrounds that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions.

Director Selection

When identifying, evaluating and considering potential candidates for membership on our Board, including those who might be recommended or nominated by our stockholders, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers, among other factors, relevant business and financial experience, integrity and willingness to devote the necessary time and energy. The Nominating and Governance Committee also leads the Board in an annual self-evaluation to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively and in compliance with the governance guidelines. This self-evaluation includes a review and assessment of the continuing independence of the Board’s non-management directors and whether Board membership and size reflects an appropriate level of diversity.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees for our Board of Directors recommended by our stockholders, using the same criteria as for other candidates. Recommendations should be submitted in writing to Christine S. Reddy, our Corporate Secretary, at 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, VA 20170. The recommendation should include the name and address of the stockholder making the recommendation and evidence of his or her ownership of our common stock, including the number of shares and period of ownership, the name and address of the director candidate, and his or her resume or listing of qualifications, and the candidate’s signed consent to serve as a director if elected and to be named in the Proxy Statement. To be considered, the recommendation must be timely received by the Corporate Secretary in accordance with the timing described in “Information Concerning Stockholder Proposals” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The Nominating and Governance Committee may consider advice and recommendations from others, including search firms as it deems appropriate.

- 13 -


Director Experience

In furtherance of the detailed director biographies above, the below table highlights specific experience, skills, qualifications and attributes of our directors that are important to us and how the composition of our nominees for the Board meets these needs. A director may possess additional experience, skills, qualifications and attributes, even if not specifically indicated below.

Experience

   LOGO      LOGO      LOGO      LOGO      LOGO    

 

  LOGO   

   LOGO      LOGO      LOGO      LOGO      LOGO      LOGO   

Building Product Manufacturing/Distribution

Specific experience with the manufacturing and distribution of building products and related businesses

                  

Marketing/Communications

Experience managing a marketing/sales function and increasing the value of a brand over time

                     

Technology/Cybersecurity

Experience with IT/technology matters and managing data protection and mitigating cybersecurity risk

                      

Finance/Investment Banking/Auditing

Knowledge of finance and/or financial reporting/auditing experience and/or experience with investment banking

                   

Other Public Board Service

Experience serving as a public company director other than on the Company’s board

                

Company Leadership

“C-Suite” or divisional presidency experience

             

Business Ethics

Track record of integrity, moral principles and strong character

            

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)

Informed on company issues related to ESG and monitors emerging ESG issues potentially impacting the Company’s business

            

Gender or Racial/Ethnic Diversity

                      

U.S. Military Veterans

                      

Age (Years Old)

 67 55 70 68 70 63 64 59 67 62 48 59

Director Diversity

Our Board seeks independent directors with a broad diversity of experience, professions, skills, geographic representation and backgrounds that will enhance the Board’s views and opinions and will provide for further robust deliberations and more innovative and resilient decisions. We believe that enhancing our Board’s diversity is for the Company’s and stockholders’ long-term benefit.

- 14 -


The Board is committed to actively seeking out highly qualified diverse candidates (which the Board defines to include candidates who are diverse due to gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, national origin or other elements of identity) with a variety of backgrounds, skills and experiences as part of the director selection process. Any search firm engaged by the Nominating and Governance Committee will be tasked with considering the characteristics described here and in the governance guidelines.

Board Diversity Matrix. The table below provides certain highlights of the composition of our Board members and nominees as of December 22, 2021. Each of the categories listed in the below table has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f).

Total Number of Directors

 

12

  

    Female    

 

    Male    

 

    Did Not Disclose Gender    

Part I: Gender Identity

Directors

 

1

 

11

 

Part II: Demographic Background

African American or Black

 

 

1

 

Alaskan Native or Native American

 

 

 

Asian

 

 

 

Hispanic or Latinx

 

 

 

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

 

 

 

White

 

1

 

10

 

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

 

 

 

LGBTQ+

 

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

 

Compensation of Directors

Please see “Compensation of Directors” in the Information on Executive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement.

Board Leadership Structure

Mr. Knisely serves as our non-executive Chair of the Board. Our Chief Executive Officer, Julian Francis, also serves on the Board. The Board believes that this leadership model is appropriate for the following reasons:

these roles enable decisive leadership, ensure clear accountability and foster alignment between the Board and management on corporate strategy;

our Board has adopted strong and effective corporate governance policies and procedures to promote the effective and independent governance of the Company (See “Corporate Governance” and “Code of Ethics and Business Conduct”);

our independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present; and

in determining the appropriate leadership structure, the Board considered a number of factors, including the candor and dynamics of discussion among the directors and between directors and management and the effectiveness of Mr. Knisely’s service on the Board to date.

Because our Chair of the Board has not been determined to be an independent director by our Board, our Board has elected a Lead Independent Director. Mr. Stuart Randle currently serves as the Board’s Lead Independent Director, and the responsibilities of this position include the following:

preside at meetings of the Board’s independent directors;

assign certain tasks to the Board’s committees from time to time;

- 15 -


recommend agenda items and times for Board meetings; and

perform such other functions as the Board may direct.

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board, which is the Company’s ultimate decision-making body, except with respect to those matters reserved to our stockholders. Our Board’s key mission is to maximize long-term stockholder value. Our Board establishes our overall corporate policies, selects and evaluates our executive management team (which is charged with the conduct of our business), and acts as an advisor and counselor to executive management. Our Board also oversees our business strategy and planning, as well as the performance of management in executing its business strategy and assessing and managing risks.

Role in Risk Oversight

The Board takes an active role in monitoring and assessing the Company’s risks, which include risks associated with business strategy, operations, credit, financing, cybersecurity, and capital investments. Management is responsible for the Company’s day-to-day risk management activities and our Board’s role is to engage in informed risk oversight. Our Board members also annually participate in the Company’s risk assessment process and evaluation. Management, through its internal audit function, compiles an annual ranking of risks to which the Company could be subjected. Our Vice President of Internal Audit reviews the results of this risk assessment with the Audit Committee. Any significant risks are then reviewed by the Board and assigned for oversight. In fulfilling this oversight role, our Board focuses on understanding the nature of our enterprise risks, including our operations and strategic direction, as well as the adequacy of our risk management process and overall risk management system. There are a number of ways our Board performs this function, including the following:

at its regularly scheduled meetings, the Board receives management updates on our business operations, financial results and strategy and discusses risks related to the business;

the Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of risk management by discussing with management, particularly the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our guidelines and policies regarding financial and enterprise risk management and risk appetite, including major risk exposures, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. In particular, the Audit Committee also receives regular reports from the Company’s Chief Information Officer on cybersecurity risk management; and

through management updates and committee reports, the Board monitors our risk management activities, including the annual risk assessment process, risks relating to our compensation programs, and financial and operational risks being managed by the Company.

The Compensation Committee also has oversight responsibility for risks and exposures related to employee compensation programs and management succession planning, and it assesses whether the organization’s compensation practices encourage risk taking that would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the structure and elements of our compensation programs and its policies and practices that manage or mitigate such risk, including the balance of short-term and long- term incentives, use of multiple performance measures, and a multi-year vesting schedule for long-term incentives. Based on these reviews, the Compensation Committee believes that our compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk taking.

- 16 -


Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)

Beacon was founded on a set of principles that have guided our business practices and growth philosophy for over 90 years. Through growth, geographic expansion, and acquisition of building supply brands throughout the United States and Canada, we have sustained a values-based company culture. Our values continue to be the foundation of being a preferred partner for our customers, employees, suppliers and communities. Beacon’s principles include a focus on valuing the impact our business has on the environment, employees, customers and the communities in which we operate. Below are certain 2021 highlights of our business in regards to Beacon’s Environmental, Social – Human Capital and Governance functions.

Environmental

We believe that protection of the environment is important to the long-term success of our business, and we are committed to sustainable business practices, as shown by:

• Becoming an EPA SmartWay Partner in 2021 to benchmark with and learn from companies that have similar large fleets and are seeking to minimize emissions.

• Utilizing the Beacon OTC® Network strategy to minimize our average gallons of fuel per delivery by using a holistic market model that optimizes customer deliveries by shipping from the closest branch to the customer’s delivery address.

• Expecting our suppliers to preserve natural resources and continuously improve the environmental impact of their products as expressed in our Supplier Code of Conduct.

Social – Human Capital

Governance

We value our employees, customers and suppliers and emphasize our Company’s core values of having shared expectations of respect and inclusivity, work ethic, collaboration, and a commitment to deliver quality results, as shown through:

• Maintaining work safety through comprehensive tracking of workers’ compensation and auto claims, OSHA incidents, lost time rates and DOT compliance. In 2021, we continued to implement COVID-19 protocols across all locations.

• Conducting new hire and annual training to raise safety awareness as well as maintaining e-learning courses to deliver new hire, professional development, and annual training on subjects such as management skills, product knowledge, operational proficiency and unconscious bias.

• In 2021, we took a leadership role in our industry by providing LGBTQ+ introductory training at the National Women in Roofing conference and partnered with INROADS to provide internships for racially and ethnically diverse students.

• Beacon’s founding sponsorship of National Women in Roofing, a volunteer-based organization that supports and advances the careers of women roofing professionals, as well as Beacon’s inaugural North American Female Roofing Professional of the Year contest in 2021.

• Beacon of Hope contest to give back to distinguished military veterans by providing roofing replacements or repairs, which has helped assure safe roofs for 32 former service people.

• Beacon CaReS, as launched in 2021, an employee assistance fund to support team members who are impacted by unexpected financial crisis (as supported by donations from both us and our employees) as well as the Robert R. Buck Scholarships ($25,000) to employees’ children to pursue post-secondary education.

Our employees, managers and officers conduct our business under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer as overseen by our Board of Directors recommended byto enhance our shareholders, usinglong-term value for stockholders. Our Board is also responsible for the same criteria as for other candidates. Recommendations should be submitted in writing to Ross D. Cooper, our corporate secretary, at 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, VA 20170. The recommendation should include the name and address of the shareholder making the recommendation and evidence of his or her ownershipoversight of our common stock, including the number of shares and period of ownership, the name and address of the director candidate, and his or her resume or listing of qualifications, and the candidate’s signed consent to serverisk management as a director if elected and to be namedfurther described above in the Proxy Statement. To be considered,“Role in Risk Oversight” section.

One of Beacon’s focuses is ensuring our information security team deploys an array of cybersecurity capabilities to protect our various business systems and data, such as through:

• Our Chief Information Officer briefing the recommendation must be received by the secretary not less than 90 calendar days and not more than 120 calendar days before the one-year anniversary dateAudit Committee of our most recent Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider advice and recommendations from others, including search firms as it deems appropriate.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a formal charter that governs its duties and conduct. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter complies with applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations. A copy of the charter is available on our website at www.becn.com. In addition, the charter is available in print to any shareholder who requests it in writing to our Chief Financial Officer at Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170.

How may the Board be contacted?

Shareholders or other interested parties wishing to communicate confidentially with our Board of Directors can call 866-574-1199 in the United States and leave a message for the Chair of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors or an individual director. In the alternative, shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board of Directors or an individual director in writing by mailing such communication to Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170, Attn: Chief Financial Officer. Each communication intended for members of the Board of Directors and received by the Chief Financial Officer will be reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Communications related to the operation of the Company which are not sales solicitations or of a similar commercial nature will be forwarded to the specified party or parties.

How are directors compensated?

Please see “Compensation of Directors” in the Information on Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement.quarterly regarding information security matters.

 

16


AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS• We continually invest in protecting, monitoring, alerting and mitigating risks across the enterprise including, as one of our risk mitigation investments, obtaining an information security risk insurance policy.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval

• Our information security and Proceduresprivacy policies being regularly updated based on business, compliance, and any other needs.

The Audit Committee is responsible

• Providing new hire and annual security awareness and privacy training to all online employees and for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee. As part of its responsibility, the Audit Committee established a policy requiring the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the registered public accounting firm. In pre-approving services, the Audit Committee considers whether such services are consistentkey departments dealing with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

Prior to the engagement of the registered public accounting firm for an upcoming audit/non-audit service period, defined as a twelve-month timeframe, Ernst & Young LLP submits a detailed list of services expected to be rendered during that periodsensitive data types as well as an estimate of the associated fees for each of the following four categories of servicesconducting monthly phishing assessment exercises to the Audit Committee for approval.ensure employees are aware and educated about phishing threats and are trained to identify and report them.

Audit Services consist of services rendered by an external auditor for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements (including audit services performed to audit the Company’s accounting for income taxes)

• External and internal controlsresources performing assessments and reviews ofpenetration testing throughout the year on Beacon applications, networks, and environments, including an annual review to verify our quarterly financial statements. It also includes services that generally only an external auditor can reasonably provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, consents and assistance with and review of documents filedcompliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audit-Related Services consist of assurance and related services (e.g. due diligence) by an external auditor that are reasonably related to audit or review of financial statements, including employee benefit plan audits, due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, and accounting consultations.

Tax Services consist of services not included in Audit Services above, rendered by an external auditor for tax compliance, tax consulting and tax planning.

Other Non-Audit Services are any other permissible work that is not an Audit, Audit-Related or Tax Service.

Circumstances may arise during the twelve-month period when it may become necessary to engage the independent auditor for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent auditor. The chairman of the Audit Committee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, may pre-approve any non-audit services, up to a limit of $20,000.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The table below summarizes the fees and expenses billed by our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016.

Year

 

Audit

 

 

Audit Related

 

 

Tax

 

 

All Other

 

 

Total

 

2017

 

$

3,268,169

 

 

$

329,250

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,597,419

 

2016

 

$

3,330,611

 

 

$

2,000

 

 

$

6,305

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,338,916

 

Audit fees include fees and expenses for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, the audit of our internal controls, the reviews of the interim financial statements, issued comfort letters and other services related to the five acquisitions during fiscal year 2017.

The audit-related services reflect the subscription fee for accounting research software and due diligence fees associated with the review of Allied acquisition.

Tax fees represent professional services related to tax compliance and consulting, including those associated with acquisitions and tax due diligence in the U.S. and Canada.

17


The Audit Committee has considered the compatibility of the provision of services covered by the preceding paragraph with the maintenance of the principal accountant’s independence from the Company and has determined that the provision of such services is not incompatible with the maintenance of such independence.

The Audit Committee annually reviews the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm and the fees charged for its services.Payment Card Industries Data Security Standards (PCI DSS).

 

18


Report of the Audit Committee

The role of the Audit Committee is• Implementing our incident response plan to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting processquickly understand, triage and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal controls.contain any issues.

- 17 -


Retirement Age

No person shall be nominated by the Board to serve as a director after he or she has passed his or her 72nd birthday, unless the Nominating and Governance Committee has voted, on an annual basis, to waive the mandatory retirement age for such director.

Orientation Training and Continuing Development Education

New directors are generally required to participate in an orientation program, which includes the introduction of the new directors to the Company’s principal officers and presentations by senior management to familiarize new directors with the Company’s strategic plans and business units. The Board has adopted a Director Education Program and will conduct at least one continuing professional development program for all Board members each year. In addition, continuing professional development opportunities for all directors will be conducted through the Company’s regular Board meetings and Board meeting materials; periodic Board or Board committee presentations by the Company’s officers concerning the Company’s strategies, business plans, management structure and significant financial, accounting and risk management issues; Board or Board committee presentations by outside parties; and other professional development opportunities, if appropriate and relevant to the duties of a director of the Company, including presentations and educational programs offered by various outside organizations, with appropriate expenses paid by the Company.

Stockholder Communications to the Board

Stockholders or other interested parties wishing to communicate confidentially with our Board of Directors can call 866-574-1199 in the United States and leave a message for the Chair of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors or an individual director. Alternatively, stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board of Directors or an individual director in writing by mailing such communication to Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170, Attn: Corporate Secretary. Each communication intended for members of the Board of Directors and received by the Corporate Secretary will be reviewed by the Corporate Secretary.Communications related to the operation of the Company which are not sales solicitations or of a similar commercial nature will be forwarded to the specified party or parties.

- 18 -


In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the auditor’s independence from the Company and management. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, regarding the independent public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee approved that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017.

AUDIT COMMITTEE:

Carl T. Berquist, Chairman

Robert M. McLaughlin

Douglas L. Young

19


EXECUTIVE OFFICERSPROPOSAL TWO:

Our executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Information on our executive officers who were serving as of the end of fiscal year 2017 is as follows:RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Ernst & Young LLP has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 1997 and has advised us that the firm does not have any direct financial interest or indirect financial interest in the Company or any of its subsidiaries. We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, and to perform other appropriate services. The Board and the Audit Committee consider Ernst & Young LLP well qualified to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and recommend ratification of such selection by the stockholders.

Although action by stockholders for this matter is not required, the Board and the Audit Committee believe that it is appropriate to seek stockholder ratification of the selection in order to provide our stockholders with a means of communicating their level of satisfaction with the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm and its level of independence from management. If the proposal is not approved and the selection of Ernst & Young LLP is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee will take this into consideration and will reconsider the appointment. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its sole discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee feels that such a change would be in the Company’s best interests and our stockholders’ best interests.

A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, will have the opportunity to make a brief presentation to the stockholders if he or she so desires and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The table below summarizes the fees and expenses billed by our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:

  

 

  2021   2020   

  Audit Fees

  $        2,815,572   $        2,778,938   

  Audit-Related Fees

   2,000    1,193,761   

  Tax Fees

       —   

  All Other Fees

       —   

  Total Fees

  $2,817,572   $3,972,699   

Audit fees include fees and expenses for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, the audit of our internal controls, the reviews of the interim financial statements, and the issuance of comfort letters.

The audit-related fees relate to the Company’s annual subscription to EY Atlas, an accounting and reporting research tool, and professional services rendered in connection with the audit of the financial statements of the interior products business.

There were no tax or other non-audit services, as described below, rendered by Ernst & Young LLP in 2021 or 2020.

The Audit Committee has considered the compatibility of the provision of services covered by the preceding paragraph with the maintenance of the registered public accounting firm’s independence from the Company and has determined that the provision of such services is not incompatible with the maintenance of such independence.

- 19 -


The Audit Committee annually reviews the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm and the fees charged for its services.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee. As part of its responsibility, the Audit Committee established a policy requiring the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. In pre-approving services, the Audit Committee considers whether such services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

Prior to the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for an upcoming audit/non-audit service period, defined as a twelve-month timeframe (with this year to also include the three-month transition period due to the change in the Company’s fiscal year end), Ernst & Young LLP submits a detailed list of services expected to be rendered during that period as well as an estimate of the associated fees for each of the following four categories of services to the Audit Committee for approval.

 

Name

Audit Services consist of services rendered by an external auditor for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and internal controls and reviews of our quarterly financial statements. It also includes services that generally only an external auditor can reasonably provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, consents and assistance with, and review of, documents filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Services consist of assurance and related services by an external auditor that are reasonably related to audit or review of financial statements, including employee benefit plan audits, due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, subscriptions for accounting research software, and accounting consultations.

Tax Services consist of services not included in Audit Services above, rendered by an external auditor for tax compliance, tax consulting and tax planning.

Other Non-Audit Services are any other permissible work that is not an Audit, Audit-Related or Tax Service.

Circumstances may arise during the fifteen-month period when it may become necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent auditor. The Chair of the Audit Committee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, may pre-approve any audit or non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, provided that any such approvals are presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

 

Age

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE RETENTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR OUR 2022 FISCAL YEAR.

Report of the Audit Committee

The role of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting process and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal controls.

In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the auditor’s

- 20 -


independence from the Company and management. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, regarding the independent public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2021.

AUDIT COMMITTEE:

Carl T. Berquist, Chair

Barbara G. Fast

Robert M. McLaughlin

Douglas L. Young

- 21 -


PROPOSAL THREE:

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, stockholders are being given the opportunity to vote on an advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers or NEOs, as described below under “Information on Executive Compensation,” which includes compensation tables and narrative discussions of the NEOs’ compensation in this Proxy Statement.

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our NEO compensation as set forth in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our NEOs’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophies, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. We are asking our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following non-binding resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosure contained in the accompanying Proxy Statement.”

This resolution is required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act. Although our Board of Directors intends to carefully consider the stockholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature. The current frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation is annually. The next vote on executive compensation is expected to occur at our 2023 Annual Meeting of stockholders.

Our Company has grown rapidly through internal growth and acquisitions to become the largest publicly traded distributor of residential and non-residential roofing materials and complementary building products in the United States and Canada, operating branches in all 50 U.S. states and six Canadian provinces. We believe our past accomplishments, including consistent profitability and growth, support the effectiveness of our executive pay program, which is intended to attract, motivate and retain experienced and skilled executives. We also believe the program provides the NEOs listed in our summary compensation table with compensation that is competitive within our industry, internally equitable and commensurate with their talents and responsibilities. The primary objective of the program is to closely align executive total direct compensation with the attainment of our annual and long-term performance goals. The compensation of our NEOs consists of base salary, cash incentives, long-term incentive compensation in the form of Company stock options, performance vested stock unit awards, time vested stock unit awards, and certain perquisites such as an auto allowance, fuel reimbursement, and, on occasion, housing and other allowances for relocated executives. Cash incentives are linked directly to Company quantitative performance and individual qualitative performance in accordance with the terms of the cash incentive program.

 

Position

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

Robert R. Buck

- 22 -


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers are elected by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. The following provides certain business experience with respect to individuals who serve as our executive officers. Information concerning the business experience of Mr. Francis is provided in “Proposal One: Election of Directors” above.

 

NameAgePosition

Julian G. Francis

55

70

Chairman of the Board

Paul M. Isabella

62

President and Chief Executive Officer, Director

Joseph M. Nowicki

56

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Ross D. Cooper

52

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Robert R. Buck — Chairman. Mr. Buck joined us as President and Chief Executive Officer, (CEO) and was first elected a director in October 2003. He was appointed Chairman of the Board in March 2007 and remained CEO until January 1, 2011. Prior to joining us, he served as President-Uniform Rental Division of Cintas Corporation from 1997 to 2003. From 1991 through 1997, he served as Senior Vice President - Midwest Region of Cintas. From 1982 through 1991, he served as Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Cintas. Mr. Buck presently serves on the Boards of Multi-Color Corporation and Quanex Building Products Corporation, both publicly-traded companies, and Elkay Manufacturing. Mr. Buck has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Cincinnati.Director

Frank A. Lonegro

Paul M. Isabella — President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Isabella joined us as President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2007 and was promoted to CEO effective January 1, 2011. Mr. Isabella also became a director in February 2011. Prior to joining us, he served as Executive Vice President of Cooper Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of electrical and other products, from 2005 to 2007 and Senior Vice President of Stanley Works, a manufacturer of tools and hardware and a provider of security products, from 1999 to 2005. He began his career with General Electric Company in 1977 and worked in various GE businesses for 22 years. Mr. Isabella has a bachelor’s degree from State University of New York at Cortland.

Joseph M. Nowicki — 

53Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Nowicki joined us as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on April 1, 2013. He was the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for Spartan Motors, Inc., a custom chassis and vehicle manufacturer, from June 2009 to March 2013. Prior to Spartan, he was with Herman Miller, Inc., a furniture manufacturer, from 1992 through 2009 where he held progressive financial roles, lastly as Vice President, Investor Relations and Treasurer. He also held past financial positions with IBM and General Motors. Mr. Nowicki presently serves on the Boards of ASV Holdings, Inc. and Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. Mr. Nowicki is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a bachelor’s degree from Canisius College and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan.

Christine S. Reddy

Ross D. Cooper — 

53Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Cooper joined us in July 2006 and was promoted to & Corporate Secretary

Sean M. McDevitt

55Executive Vice President, effective October 1, 2015. Prior to joining us, Mr. Cooper was a shareholder of Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A., a law firm, since 1999. From 1996 to 2006, Mr. Cooper served as outside general counsel to Building Suppliers Corporation, LLC, an organization of roofing and construction materials wholesale distributors. Mr. Cooper received a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Cornell University and a J.D. from George Washington University Law School.Chief Human Resources Officer

Jonathan S. Bennett

53Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer

20Christopher C. Nelson


51Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer

C. Munroe Best III

50President, South Division

J. Jake Gosa

46President, North Division

Jason L. Taylor

50President, West Division

Frank A. Lonegro — Mr. Lonegro joined Beacon in 2020 to serve as an Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer from CSX Corporation, a $12 billion Fortune 500 transportation company, where he served for nineteen years, culminating as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2015-2019. Mr. Lonegro’s career at CSX entailed a unique blend of cross-functional experience, combining financial, operational and functional executive leadership roles. As Chief Financial Officer, he helped lead transformative operational changes yielding substantial productivity savings and markedly improved operating margins which led to significant stockholder value creation. Prior to his role as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Lonegro delivered strong results in key leadership roles of increasing responsibility across operations, service, information technology and internal audit. Prior to joining CSX, Mr. Lonegro practiced law for seven years, focusing on complex commercial litigation, loan workouts and business transactions. Mr. Lonegro earned a bachelor’s degree from Duke University, a law degree from the University of Florida and an MBA from the University of Florida.

Christine S. Reddy — Ms. Reddy joined Beacon in April 2021 to serve as an Executive Vice President and the General Counsel from Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), a publicly traded $120 billion financial services company ranked #24 on the Fortune 500, the leading source of mortgage financing in the United States delivering $1.4 trillion in liquidity annually to the U.S. mortgage market. At Fannie Mae, she served for fifteen years as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Deputy Corporate Secretary. Ms. Reddy managed corporate governance, Board of Director, operations, procurement and technology legal services and key strategic joint ventures. During her tenure at Fannie Mae she was an executive partner in driving strategic priorities and innovation objectives, including for data, cybersecurity, digital platforms and ESG. Previous to Fannie Mae, she was Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Public Broadcasting Service, America’s largest public media enterprise. A Virginia State and Echols Scholar, Ms. Reddy earned a Phi Beta Kappa bachelor’s degree from the University of Virginia and a law degree from the University of Virginia School of Law, where she was a Dillard Fellow.

Sean M. McDevitt — Mr. McDevitt joined Beacon in May 2021 to serve as an Executive Vice President and the Chief Human Resources Officer. He had previously served as Executive Vice President and CHRO at Apple Leisure Group, a $4.5 billion global integrated travel company, since 2019. Before that he had a 22-year career with PepsiCo, Inc. and Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., serving both in the U.S. and internationally. He concluded his time at Pepsi as Senior Vice President, Field Human Resources for North America Beverages, where he supported over 50,000 employees and led a 250-person HR team across 360 U.S. and Canada locations. Mr. McDevitt earned a bachelor’s degree in psychology and a Master’s of Organizational Behavior from Brigham Young University.

Jonathan S. Bennett — Mr. Bennett joined Beacon in June 2021 to serve as an Executive Vice President and the Chief Commercial Officer responsible for Beacon’s integrated go-to-market strategy comprised of selling excellence, category

- 23 -


management, marketing, pricing, and supply chain. He previously served as Executive Vice President, Merchandising and Supply Chain at Total Wine & More, the country’s largest independent retailer of beverage alcohol, since 2016. Before that, he was Chief Merchandising Officer of Interline Brands, a $2 billion facilities MRO business that was acquired by The Home Depot during his tenure. Earlier, Mr. Bennett had an 11-year career at The Home Depot, holding roles of increasing responsibility. He earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania and a law degree from Harvard Law School.

Christopher C. Nelson — Mr. Nelson joined Beacon in July 2006 to serve as an Executive Vice President and the Chief Information Officer. Prior to that, Mr. Nelson was Vice President, Information Systems & Supply Chain, for Dan River, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of bedding products. He was with Dan River for 10 years. Prior to his role at Dan River, Mr. Nelson was with PricewaterhouseCoopers as a Management Consultant. Mr. Nelson received a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University and a Global Executive M.B.A. with honors from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Kenan-Flagler Business School.

C. Munroe Best III — Mr. Best has served as President of the South Division since 2018 and has oversight of the South Division, which includes the Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, Southeast and Florida Regions as well as the National Dealers Choice business. Prior to joining Beacon in 2000 as part of the acquisition of Best Distributing, Mr. Best spent six years with Best Distributing in a variety of roles in the distribution channel and was responsible for launching the complementary products business. He was promoted to Regional Vice President of the South Atlantic Region in 2007 and named Senior Vice President in 2011 when Beacon completed two acquisitions in Florida, and he took on the additional responsibility for the newly formed Florida Region. In 2013, Mr. Best was appointed Executive Vice President of the South Division and it was at that time that the Southeast Region and Dealers Choice business were added to his overall responsibility. With the acquisition of Allied Building Products in January 2018, Mr. Best was promoted to the role of Divisional President. Mr. Best graduated from Elon University in 1994 with a bachelor’s degree in business administration.

J. Jake Gosa — Mr. Gosa has served as President of the North Division since 2019 and has oversight of the North Division including Canada. Mr. Gosa began his career at Beacon in 2007 as the Assistant Vice President, Midwest Region. In 2012, Mr. Gosa was promoted to Regional Vice President for the Southwest Region and in 2018 appointed Vice President for the Texas Region. Prior to joining Beacon, Mr. Gosa worked at GAF/ELK for ten years where he held roles of increasing responsibility including National Sales Manager and Director of National Accounts. Mr. Gosa graduated from Shepherd University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business.

Jason L. Taylor — Mr. Taylor has served as President of the West Division since 2020 and has oversight of the West Division which includes the weatherproofing product category. Mr. Taylor began his career with Beacon in 2011. During his tenure with the Company, he has held the roles of Regional Manager, Regional Vice President for the Pacific Region and Vice President, Sales for the West Division. Prior to joining Beacon, Mr. Taylor was Vice President at AlixPartners LLP, a consulting firm specializing in turnarounds. Mr. Taylor received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley and holds an MBA from Harvard Business School.

- 24 -


INFORMATION ON EXECUTIVEEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides detail on the compensation programs for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executives (collectively, our “NEOs”) including the overall objectives of our compensation program, each element of compensation provided, and an explanation of the reasons for the compensation decisions we have made for these individuals with respect to fiscal year 2021. Our NEOs for fiscal year 2021 were:

LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

OverviewJulian G. Francis

The responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are to review our compensation and benefit plans to ensure that they meet our objectives as well as review the Chief Executive Officer’s performance, recommend the annual compensation of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, review the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations on compensation of our other executive officers, and make recommendations for adopting and changing major compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee reports its recommendations for cash and non-equity compensation to the full Board of Directors for approval and authorization. The Compensation Committee also administers and approves equity awards under our stock plan.

Objectives of Compensation Program

Our compensation practices are intended to attract, motivate and retain highly competent executives in a competitive marketplace. The program provides named executive officers listed in our summary compensation table with compensation that is industry competitive, internally equitable and commensurate with their skills, knowledge, experience and responsibilities.

The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to firmly align total executive compensation with the long term interests of our shareholders and the attainment of our annual and long-term performance goals. The annual goals are principally based upon our income before income taxes and the long-term goals are principally based on our stock price, Adjusted Earnings Per Share, acquisition synergies and return on invested capital, and for fiscal year 2017, Adjusted Earnings Per Share and average organic net sales growth rate. Adjusted Earnings Per Share (“Adjusted EPS”) means net income per share, as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, adjusted to add back acquisition costs and certain incremental amortization of intangibles related to the RSG transaction.

The compensation of our executive officers consists of base salary, cash bonuses, long-term incentive compensation in the form of Company stock options and restricted stock awards, and certain perquisites such as an auto allowance and fuel reimbursement. From time to time, the Company will also pay for relocation expenses, including temporary housing, commuting airfare, automobile lease and related expenses, associated with relocating executives.

Use of Consultants and Peer Group Data

The Company establishes executive compensation levels through evaluation of a comprehensive benchmarking analysis prepared by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“Cook & Co.”), an independent compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee. Although the Company does not use strict numeric benchmarking to establish individual executive compensation levels, the Company takes into account the median level of compensation for similarly situated executives at the peer group companies used by the Compensation Committee to guide executive compensation decisions. Where direct comparisons are not available from the peer group, we utilize market-based executive pay survey data on similarly situated executives to help guide our decisions. Because job content, accountability, responsibility, incumbent seniority and performance criteria vary from one company to the next, our Compensation Committee uses the numerical benchmarking data and median levels of similarly situated executives information as a guideline in exercising its discretion in determining compensation for our executive officers.

In reviewing and determining executive compensation levels for fiscal year 2017, Cook & Co. reviewed the latest data for a peer group of distribution companies, most of which are of similar sales, earnings, market capitalization and complexity as the Company, in developing its recommendations for executive compensation to the Compensation Committee. Based on the review performed by Cook & Co., and at its recommendation, we utilized the following peer group in fiscal year 2017 to assess our executive compensation (the same group that was utilized in fiscal year 2016): Airgas, Anixter International, Applied Industrial Technologies, BMC Stock Holdings, Builders FirstSource, Kaman, MRC Global, MSC Industrial Direct, NOW, Patterson Companies, Pool Corp., Watsco, Wesco Aircraft Holdings and WESCO International.

21


The Compensation Committee used the peer group data as general guidance, together with other information such as general business trends, the competitiveness of the markets in which we operate, individual performance, and its own judgment in setting overall executive compensation. In addition, the Committee considered the results of the then most recent shareholder advisory vote on our executive compensation held on February 19, 2016, in which approximately 99% of the shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote supported the compensation of our named executive officers. Although the approval was advisory in nature, the Committee viewed the overwhelmingly positive response as confirmation that our shareholders generally believe that the pay of the named executive officers is appropriately aligned with their performance and the performance of the Company as well as the interests of our shareholders.

The Compensation Committee considered various factors bearing upon Cook & Co.’s independence and determined that Cook & Co. is independent and that its engagement did not present any conflicts of interest. Cook & Co. provides no other services to the Company.

Base Salaries

The first element of our compensation program is salary. As noted above, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer, and recommends their salaries to the full Board of Directors in light of those evaluations. The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis in consideration of their performance during the previous year. Mr. Buck’s base salary remained at $300,000 for fiscal year 2017. The Compensation Committee considered the following quantitative and qualitative factors in evaluating the Chairman’s performance in setting fiscal year 2017 compensation:

the Company’s performance and relative total shareholder return;

the value of Mr. Buck’s continued leadership role to both the Company and the Board as executive chairman; and

the compensation plans of chairmen of comparable companies.

Mr. Isabella’s base salary was set at $800,000 for fiscal year 2017. The Compensation Committee considered the following quantitative and qualitative factors in evaluating the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in setting fiscal year 2017 compensation:

the Company’s performance and relative total shareholder return;

the value of Mr. Isabella’s leadership;

the compensation plans of chief executive officers of comparable companies; and

the recommendations of an independent compensation consultant (discussed above).

Base salaries of our executive officers other than the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer are also recommended annually by the Compensation Committee to the full Board of Directors after consultation with, and upon the recommendation of, the Chief Executive Officer. The base salary of each executive officer is recommended by the Chief Executive Officer to the Compensation Committee after evaluating each executive officer’s performance over the year in consideration of (i) the Company’s overall financial performance, (ii) the individual’s performance during the year and contributions to the Company, and (iii) other relevant factors (for example, market conditions).

The Compensation Committee considers a number of factors when evaluating the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations regarding base salaries for the other executive officers. Periodically, the Compensation Committee reviews industry specific compensation surveys that provide detailed information regarding the compensation practices of industry peers, competitors and companies of similar market value. Other information that the Committee deems relevant, such as general business trends, the competitiveness of the markets in which we operate and special circumstances, also may be considered in its evaluation.

22


Annual Cash Incentives

The second element of our compensation program is an annual cash incentive. Annual incentives are a significant component of executive compensation, reflecting the Company’s belief that management’s contribution to long-term shareholder returns (via increasing stock prices) comes from increasing current earnings and properly preparing the Company for future earnings growth. We believe these incentives play a key role in enabling us to attract, retain and motivate our employees.

For fiscal year 2017, under the terms of our management cash incentive plan, a target incentive amount was set for each participant. Those amounts are set forth below in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table under the heading “Target.”

The incentives for our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table were based 80% on a Company-wide adjusted earnings before taxes (“AEBT”) target and 20% on qualitative performance evaluations of strategic performance goals. AEBT means income before taxes, as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, adjusted to exclude amortization and stock compensation expense and the impact of significant: gains (losses) on the disposal of assets; asset impairments, retirements or write-downs; gains (losses) associated with legal, insurance or tax settlements/adjustments; restructuring, severance or pension-related charges; or other similar items out of the ordinary course of business.

If the AEBT target was not met at the 100% level, the participant’s bonus with respect to that target was pro-rated on a straight line basis if the participant achieved a range of 80% to 100% of target, with no bonus paid at or less than 80% of target. The individual strategic performance goals are outlined below. In addition, each participant (excluding our Chairman) could receive an additional incentive above the target incentive amount if actual AEBT exceeded 100% of AEBT target (in an amount up to 100% of the AEBT portion of the target incentive if actual AEBT performance is 120% of the AEBT target) and an additional incentive if qualitative performance goals are exceeded (in an amount up to 20% of the qualitative portion of the target incentive if actual qualitative goals performance is 120% of target performance). Taken together, each participant (excluding our Chairman) could earn an additional incentive up to 84% of their target incentive. The Compensation Committee performs the individual qualitative performance evaluations of our ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer, and our

Director

LOGO

Frank A. Lonegro

Executive Vice President, Chief

Financial Officer

LOGO

Jonathan S. Bennett

Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer performs

LOGO

C. Munroe Best III

President, South Division

LOGO

Jason L. Taylor

President, West Division

Overview

The responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are to review our compensation and benefit plans to ensure that they meet our objectives, recommend the annual compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, review our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations on and approve compensation of our other named executive officers, and make recommendations for adopting and changing major compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee also administers and approves equity awards under our stock plan and administers and approves awards to our named executive offers under our cash incentive plan.

Objectives of Compensation Program

Our compensation practices are intended to attract, motivate and retain high performing executives in a competitive marketplace. The program provides named executive officers listed in our summary compensation table with compensation that is industry competitive, internally equitable and commensurate with their skills, knowledge, experience and responsibilities.

The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to firmly align total executive compensation with the long-term interests of our stockholders and the attainment of our annual and long-term performance goals. The annual goals were historically based upon our adjusted earnings before taxes, but since fiscal 2020 have been based on adjusted earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization and operating working capital as a percentage of net sales. The long-term goals were historically based on individual performance goals and metrics such as our stock price, return on invested capital (“ROIC”), Adjusted Earnings Per Share (“Adjusted EPS”), acquisition synergies and average organic net sales growth, but since fiscal 2020 have been based on Adjusted EPS and daily average organic net sales growth. Adjusted EPS is calculated by dividing Adjusted Net

- 25 -


Income (which is net income excluding acquisition costs, restructuring costs, COVID-19 impacts (limited to costs directly related to our response to the COVID-19 pandemic), less the tax impact of adjusting items) by the weighted-average diluted shares outstanding after assuming full conversion of the participating preferred stock and excluding the impact of any preferred stock dividends.

The compensation of our named executive officers consists of base salary, cash incentives, long-term incentive compensation in the form of Company stock options and restricted stock unit awards, and certain perquisites such as an auto allowance and fuel reimbursement. The Company also provides its named executive officers executive life insurance. From time to time, the Company will also pay for relocation expenses, including temporary housing, commuting airfare, automobile lease and related expenses associated with relocating executives.

Use of Consultants and Peer Group Data

The Company establishes executive compensation levels through evaluation of a comprehensive benchmarking analysis prepared by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), an independent compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee. Although the Company does not use strict numeric benchmarking to establish individual executive compensation levels, the Company takes into account the 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile level of compensation for similarly situated executives at the peer group companies used by the Compensation Committee to guide executive compensation decisions. Where direct comparisons are not available from the peer group, we utilize market-based executive pay survey data on similarly situated executives to help guide our decisions. Because job content, accountability, responsibility and performance criteria vary from one company to the next, our Compensation Committee uses the numerical benchmarking data and median levels of similarly situated executives’ information as a guideline in exercising its discretion in determining compensation for our named executive officers.

In reviewing and determining executive compensation levels for fiscal year 2021, FW Cook reviewed the latest data for a peer group of distribution companies, most of which are of similar sales, earnings, market capitalization, number of employees, and complexity as the Company, in developing its recommendations for executive compensation to the Compensation Committee. Based on the review performed by FW Cook, and at its recommendation, we utilized the following peer group in assessing our executive compensation for fiscal year 2021: Applied Industrial Technologies, Boise Cascade Company, Builders FirstSource, Fastenal Company, GMS, Henry Schein, LKQ Corporation, MRC Global, MSC Industrial Direct, Owens & Minor, Patterson Companies, Pool Corporation, Site One Landscape Supply, Univar Solutions, Veritiv Corporation, Watsco, W.W. Grainger, Inc. and WESCO International.

The Compensation Committee used the peer group data as general guidance, together with other information such as general business trends, the competitiveness of the markets in which we operate, individual performance, and its own judgment in setting overall executive compensation. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered the results of the then most recent stockholder advisory vote on our executive compensation held on February 19, 2021, at which almost 97.6% of the shares voting supported the compensation of our named executive officers. Although the approval was advisory in nature, the Compensation Committee viewed the overwhelmingly positive response as confirmation that our stockholders generally believe that the pay of our named executive officers is appropriately aligned with their performance and the performance of the Company as well as the interests of our stockholders.

The Compensation Committee considered various factors bearing upon FW Cook’s independence and determined that FW Cook is independent and that its engagement did not present any conflicts of interest. FW Cook provides no other services to the Company.

Base Salaries

The first element of our compensation program is salary. Each year, our Board of Directors evaluates the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, and the Compensation Committee considers the Board’s evaluation in determining an appropriate overall compensation package for our Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee recommends the salary of our Chief Executive Officer to the full Board of Directors in light of that evaluation. Base salaries of our named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer are set annually by the Compensation Committee, taking into account the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer.

- 26 -


The Compensation Committee considers a number of factors when evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations regarding base salaries for our other named executive officers. Periodically, the Compensation Committee reviews industry specific compensation surveys that provide detailed information regarding the compensation practices of industry peers, competitors and companies of similar market value. The Compensation Committee also considers the compensation recommendations provided by FW Cook. Other information that the Compensation Committee deems relevant, such as general business trends, the competitiveness of the markets in which we operate and special circumstances, also may be considered in its evaluation. Mr. Francis’s base salary was set at $815,000 for fiscal year 2021. The Compensation Committee considered the following quantitative and qualitative factors in evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in setting fiscal year 2021 compensation: the Company’s performance and relative total stockholder return, the value of Mr. Francis’s leadership, the compensation plans of chief executive officers of comparable companies, and the recommendations of our independent compensation consultant (discussed above).

The base salary of each named executive officer is recommended by our Chief Executive Officer to the Compensation Committee after evaluating each named executive officer’s performance over the year in consideration of (i) the Company’s overall financial performance, (ii) the individual’s performance during the year and contributions to the Company, (iii) industry and peer company compensation data and (iv) other relevant factors (for example, market conditions). The amounts for named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading “Salary.”

Annual Cash Incentives

The second element of our compensation program is an annual cash incentive. Annual incentives are a significant component of executive compensation, reflecting the Company’s belief that management’s contribution to long-term stockholder returns (via increasing stock prices) comes from increasing current earnings and properly preparing the Company for future earnings growth. We believe these incentives play a key role in enabling us to attract, retain and motivate our employees.

For fiscal year 2021, under the terms of our management cash incentive plan, a target incentive amount was set for each participant. Those amounts are set forth below in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table under the heading “Target.”

The incentives for our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table were based 60% on an adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“AEBITDA”) target with Messrs. Francis, Lonegro and Bennett’s incentives based on a Company-wide target and Messrs. Best and Taylor’s incentives based on their respective division targets, 20% on a Company-wide operating working capital as a percentage of sales target (“Operating Working Capital”), and 20% on qualitative performance evaluations of strategic performance goals (“individual goals”). AEBITDA means net income (loss) from continuing operations excluding the impact of interest expense (net of interest income), income taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, acquisition costs, restructuring costs and COVID-19 impacts (limited to costs directly related to our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which increased AEBITDA by $1.6 million in fiscal year 2021). AEBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is equivalent to Adjusted EBITDA as reported in the Company’s periodic reports filed with the SEC and earnings releases. The numerator in the Operating Working Capital calculation is defined as inventory plus accounts receivable less accounts payable. The Operating Working Capital calculation is based on thirteen (13) month average Operating Working Capital divided by trailing twelve (12) month net sales, as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

- 27 -


The following table shows potential payouts for each of the three targets at threshold, target and maximum, both as a percentage of the incentive related to the individual target and as a percentage of the total incentive:

 
    AEBITDA (Weighted at 60% in the Annual Cash Incentive Plan)
   

Achievement Level

   Threshold (£80% of Target) Target Maximum (³120% of  Target)

Payout as Percentage of AEBITDA Target

 0% 100% 200%

Payout as Percentage of Total Incentive

 0% 60% 120%

 
Operating Working Capital (Weighted at 20% in the Annual Cash Incentive Plan)
   

Achievement Level

   Threshold
(
£30bps above  Target)
 Target Maximum (³50bps below  Target)

Payout as Percentage of Operating Working Capital Target

 0% 100% 200%

Payout as Percentage of Total Incentive

 0% 20% 40%

 
Individual Goals (Weighted at 20% in the Annual Cash Incentive Plan)
   

Achievement Level

   Threshold Target Maximum

Payout as Percentage of Individual Goals Target

 0% 100% 120%

Payout as Percentage of Total Incentive

 0% 20% 24%

Payouts between threshold achievement and target achievement and between target achievement and maximum achievement are adjusted on the basis of straight-line interpolation.

The Chair of the Compensation Committee, in consultation with our Board of Directors Chairman and other members of the Compensation Committee, performs the individual goal evaluations of our Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Executive Officer performs the individual goal evaluations of the remaining named executive officers. In each case, the results are then presented to and discussed with the Compensation Committee and FW Cook, and in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, presented to and discussed with the Board of Directors.

For the fiscal year 2021 annual incentive plan, Beacon achieved a Company-wide AEBITDA of approximately $669.6 million compared to the established target of $441.1 million, equal to 152% of target. The South Division achieved AEBITDA of 157% of target and the West Division achieved AEBITDA of 130% of target. Fiscal year 2021 AEBITDA targets and results included the interior products business for the first three (3) months of fiscal year 2021. For fiscal year 2021, the Company achieved an Operating Working Capital as a percent of trailing twelve (12) month sales of 17.74%, compared to an established target of 18.30% for the named executive officers. Our Board of Directors established the annual Company and division AEBITDA targets and the Operating Working Capital target as part of the Company’s annual budget and long-range planning process, which includes but is not limited to a review of historical and expected annual growth, profit margin and working capital management rates. The targets were set at the beginning of fiscal year 2021 and the Board believed at the time that it would require a high degree of execution of the 2021 business plan in order to attain these goals. Based on the Company, South Division and West Division actual AEBITDA results, each of which out-performed target, each participant earned two hundred percent (200%) of the AEBITDA portion of their target incentive. Based on the Company’s actual Operating Working Capital results that out-performed target, each participant earned two hundred percent (200%) of the Operating Working Capital portion of their target incentive.

- 28 -


In addition to the duties and responsibilities associated with their executive positions, each of our named executive officers are assigned specific individual goals in order to qualify for part or all of the remaining 20% portion of their target incentive amount. If the goal objectives are exceeded, each named executive officer can receive an additional incentive. Total incentives earned for fiscal year 2021, including the executive’s achievement of individual goals, are described in the table below and are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”.

Fiscal Year 2021 Annual Cash Incentive Payout (AIP)
     Financial Goals          
       AEBITDA Operating Working Capital as % of
Sales
 Individual Goals      
Name Target
AIP
  Weighting 

Achievement

%

 Payout Weighting 

Achievement

%

 Payout Weighting 

Achievement

%

 Payout Actual
AIP
 Payout
as %
of
Target

Julian G. Francis

 $937,250  60% 200% $1,124,700 20% 200% $374,900 20% 110% $206,195 $1,705,795 182%

Frank A. Lonegro

 $448,800  60% 200% $538,560 20% 200% $179,520 20% 120% $107,712 $825,792 184%

Jonathan S. Bennett

 $112,308  60% 200% $134,770 20% 200% $44,923 20% 95% $21,339 $201,031 179%

C. Munroe Best III

 $276,802  60% 200% $332,162 20% 200% $110,721 20% 100% $55,360 $498,243 180%

Jason L. Taylor

 $240,000  60% 200% $288,000 20% 200% $96,000 20% 100% $48,000 $432,000 180%

The individual goals for each named executive officer pursuant to our 2021 incentive plan were as follows:

Mr. Francis’s specific individual fiscal year 2021 goals were:

drive the Company’s financial performance to meet and exceed budget and elevate objectives; continue building confidence both internally and externally in the management team’s ability to execute against plans and guidance

build a more diverse management team to achieve the next level growth vision for the Company

lead the successful divestiture of the interior products business

accelerate future growth strategy for the Company

Mr. Lonegro’s specific individual fiscal year 2021 goals were:

successfully develop the forward strategy for capital structure, use of interior products divestiture proceeds, and debt management

drive organization to attain stretch financial performance

develop future merger and acquisition strategy

improve monthly close, forecasting and budgeting process and lead transition from fiscal year to calendar year financials

Mr. Bennett’s specific individual fiscal year 2021 goals were:

lead the design of next version of the Company’s pricing model and determine deployment strategy

complete assessment of non-residential business, with specific focus on sales acceleration and profitability

accelerate value creation strategies in digital, branded products and targeted customer segments and categories

Mr. Best’s and Mr. Taylor’s specific individual fiscal year 2021 goals were identical, but based on their respective division results (with Mr. Best leading the Company’s operations for the South Division and Mr. Taylor leading the Company’s operations for the West Division):

achieve a minimum score of 80% on the safety scorecard

ensure optimization of the remaining named executive officers and presents the results to the Compensation Committee.Beacon OTC® network

achieve a minimum of 12% of total sales via digital platforms

Each of the above-named executive officer’s respective specific individual management objectives reflect our focus on continued growth and improvement in execution over our past performance. Mr. Novich, in consultation with Mr. Knisely and the other members of the Compensation Committee, reviewed the level of achievement of Mr. Francis’s specific individual management

- 29 -


objectives set forth above. Mr. Francis reviewed the level of achievement of Messrs. Lonegro, Bennett, Best, and Taylor’s specific individual management objectives set forth above and reported his recommendations to the Compensation Committee. After careful consideration of the outcomes, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors the payment of the incentive awards in the amounts set forth in the table above and in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading “Non-equity incentive plan compensation.”

In addition to the management cash incentive plan, the Compensation Committee retains full discretion to award discretionary bonuses to the Chief Executive Officer and others to reward extraordinary efforts by named executive officers in various projects or initiatives during the year. The Compensation Committee considers the Chairman’s and Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations in determining discretionary cash awards for our other named executive officers. In 2021, Mr. Taylor was awarded a retention award of $25,000.

Equity Compensation

The third element of our compensation program is equity compensation. Equity compensation is intended to more closely align total compensation with the long-term financial interests of our stockholders. The equity compensation component of our compensation program is based upon awards of stock options and other stock awards.

Our Compensation Committee administers our stock plan. The purpose of the stock plan is to advance the interests of our stockholders by aligning compensation to the long-term performance results of the Company by:

providing directors, officers, employees and other eligible persons with additional incentives determined by the achievement of long-term financial and strategic objectives;

encouraging stock ownership by eligible persons;

aligning the interests of eligible persons with the interests of the Company;

encouraging eligible persons to remain with the Company or its affiliates; and

attracting new employees, officers and directors to the Company or its affiliates.

In determining whether to grant stock options and/or other stock awards, and, if so, how many to grant to eligible persons under our stock plan, market data and the quantitative analysis of peer group company stock awards provided by FW Cook is considered, along with each individual’s past performance and contribution to the Company, as well as that individual’s expected ability to contribute to the Company in the future. As part of the Company’s annual performance evaluation process each year, the Chief Executive Officer, after consultation with each other named executive officer, establishes that named executive officer’s performance objectives for the coming year. The actual results under these performance objectives are then used for setting grants in the succeeding year. These performance objectives are not intended to be rigid or formulaic, but rather to serve as the framework upon which the Chief Executive Officer evaluates the executive’s overall performance.

Individual performance objectives may include operational metrics and qualitative goals that may reflect corporate or departmental goals or may include specific operational and qualitative objectives with respect to the executive’s area of responsibility. These performance objectives also include the demonstration of leadership and decision making, effective communication, promotion of the Company’s strategic initiatives and values, commitment to excellence and work ethic and may include more specific objectives for the executive, such as the successful completion of major projects, successful integration of acquisitions, and organization capability building. The Chief Executive Officer’s evaluation of an executive’s performance relative to these objectives is inherently subjective, involving a high degree of judgment based on the Chief Executive Officer’s observations of, and interaction with, the executive throughout the year. The Chief Executive Officer also considers market data and the quantitative analysis of peer group company stock awards provided by FW Cook as well as the executive’s prospects for future development and advancement within the Company in formulating an equity compensation recommendation. As an additional input to the Chief Executive Officer’s evaluation of an executive’s performance, the Chief Executive Officer assesses the overall performance of the Company in light of the dynamics of the markets in which the Company competes. As a result, no single performance objective or group of objectives is material to the Chief Executive Officer’s evaluation of the executive’s performance.

- 30 -


The above evaluation provides the basis for the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendation to the Compensation Committee of equity compensation for each named executive officer. The Compensation Committee meets with the Chief Executive Officer and discusses the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations before meeting separately in executive session to discuss the Chief Executive Officer’s and FW Cook’s recommendations and making a final determination of the equity compensation to the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee applies similar factors in determining the equity compensation to the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer’s overall performance relative to these factors also is inherently subjective, involving a high degree of judgment. As additional input to the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance, the Compensation Committee assesses the overall performance of the Company in light of the dynamics of the markets in which the Company competes. As a result, no single performance objective or group of objectives is material to the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance.

Since the Company’s initial public offering and through fiscal year 2021, non-qualified stock options have been granted to key members of management at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported by Nasdaq on the date of grant. Accordingly, grants of stock options will produce value only if there are increases in the underlying stock price. In fiscal year 2011, we began issuing performance-based restricted stock unit awards to certain key members of management. Beginning in fiscal year 2014, we also began issuing time-based restricted stock unit awards to certain key members of management. Similar to stock options, we believe that restricted stock unit awards reward performance because the value of the stock is linked to our Company’s long-term performance. The Compensation Committee believes that time-based and performance-based restricted stock unit awards can play an important retentive and motivational role that stock options alone may not.

The Company’s annual equity awards were historically granted by the Compensation Committee in November of each year following the close of the Company’s fiscal year and subsequent to the approval of the annual budget for the upcoming fiscal year. No grants were made in November 2021, and commencing in 2022, we expect grants to be made in February to reflect the new December 31 fiscal year end. The Company typically does not make stock option and other stock awards other than annually, except in certain cases for key members of management hired during the course of a year, such as Mr. Bennett who was hired in 2021, or to improve the prospects of retaining key management members.

On November 12, 2020, the Compensation Committee authorized awards of stock options, time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units. All these awards were granted to our named executive officers and a number of other key employees using the recommendations from FW Cook and other considerations described above. For our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee set a target equity award value based upon recommendations from FW Cook, which reviewed peer group data, and taking into account the value of each named executive officer’s equity awards in prior years. Of that target value, and pursuant to the guidelines approved by our Board, approximately 50% of the target value was represented by performance-based restricted stock units, approximately 25% in time-based restricted stock units and approximately 25% in stock options. Under this methodology, the awards to each of our named executive officers were as follows:

 

November 2020 (Fiscal Year 2021) Long Term Incentive Awards

 
    

# of Stock
Options

 

   

% of Total
Stock Option
Awards

 

  

# of Time-
Vested
Restricted
Stock Units

 

   

# of
Performance-
Vested
Restricted
Stock Units

 

   

Total # of
Restricted
Stock Units

 

   

% of Total
Restricted
Stock Unit
Awards

 

 

  Julian G. Francis

  

 

49,610

 

  

 

15.7

 

 

21,311

 

  

 

42,622

 

  

 

63,933

 

  

 

18.5

  Frank A. Lonegro

  

 

16,428

 

  

 

5.2

 

 

7,057

 

  

 

14,114

 

  

 

21,171

 

  

 

6.1

  C. Munroe Best III

  

 

7,319

 

  

 

2.3

 

 

3,144

 

  

 

6,288

 

  

 

9,432

 

  

 

2.7

  Jason L. Taylor

  

 

4,880

 

  

 

1.5

 

 

2,096

 

  

 

4,192

 

  

 

6,288

 

  

 

1.8

The stock option awards granted to our named executive officers had an exercise price of $35.78, vest one-third annually which started on the first anniversary of the grant (November 12, 2021) and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant (November 12, 2030). The time-based restricted stock unit awards granted to our named executive officers on November 12, 2020 will vest and convert into common shares upon the third anniversary of the date of grant.

- 31 -


Mr. Bennett’s employment with the Company commenced after the issuance of the November 2020 equity grants. In connection with the commencement of his employment, he received a grant of time-vested restricted stock units, the number and terms of which are disclosed below in the tables under the headings “Fiscal Year 2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” and “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.”

The performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted to our named executive officers will vest and convert after September 30, 2023, subject to the Company achieving certain Adjusted EPS and daily average organic net sales growth targets, each weighted at 50%, established on the grant date for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2022 and the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2023 (each a “component year”). Performance of each metric will be calculated at the end of the three-year period for each component year independently.

The following table shows the percentage of the total of the award that can be earned for each metric for each component year of the three-year period, at threshold, target and maximum, as well as totals for each metric and combined totals for the three-year period:

 
Adjusted EPS Metric

Component

Year

 

Threshold

(£80% of Target)

 Target 

Maximum

(³120% of Target)

2021

 0% 16.66% 33.33%

2022

 0% 16.66% 33.33%

2023

 0% 16.66% 33.33%

Total

 0% 50% 100%
Daily Average Organic Net Sales Growth Metric

Component

Year

 

Threshold

(£200 bps below Target)

 Target 

Maximum

(³200 bps above Target)

2021

 0% 16.66% 33.33%

2022

 0% 16.66% 33.33%

2023

 0% 16.66% 33.33%

Total

 0% 50% 100%

Combined Total

 0% 100% 200%

For the Adjusted EPS metric, achievement of a target between 80% and 100% and between 100% and 120% will be adjusted on the basis of straight-line interpolation. For the daily average organic net sales growth metric, achievement of a target between two percentage points below target and target, and between target and two percentage points above target, will be adjusted on the basis of straight-line interpolation.

On November 16, 2020, the performance-based restricted stock unit awards that were granted in fiscal year 2018 vested. This award had two performance measures, two-year cumulative Adjusted EPS and two-year cumulative cost synergy as a result of the Allied acquisition, both equally weighted at 50%. The two-year cumulative Adjusted EPS target for this grant was $8.95. The Company achieved an actual two-year cumulative Adjusted EPS of $4.67, which resulted in no payout for this performance measure. The two-year cumulative cost synergy target for this grant was $110 million. The Company achieved an actual two-year cumulative cost synergy of $139 million, which resulted in a 200% payout for this performance measure. As a result, the grant as a whole vested and settled at 100% of the original share target.

Employment Agreements

Except for the Executive Severance and Restrictive Covenant Agreements described below under “Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control—Severance Agreements”, there are no other employment, severance or change-in-control agreements currently entered into by and between any named executive officers and the Company.

- 32 -


Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our named executive officers and members of our Executive Committee (consisting of divisional executive vice presidents and corporate executive vice presidents) are expected to own stock of the Company having a value set forth below:

Chief Executive Officer = 5 times annual base salary

Named executive officers and Executive Committee members = 2 times annual base salary

Executives are required to retain 50% of net profit shares attributable to stock option exercises or vesting of restricted stock units until the specified ownership level is attained. Profit shares represent the shares remaining after payment of applicable tax obligations and, in the case of stock options, payment of the stock option exercise price. There is no defined time period to meet the stock ownership requirement. Participants may satisfy their ownership guidelines with (i) shares directly owned, (ii) shares held in the Company 401(k) plan, (iii) time vested restricted stock units (which settle in stock), even if not vested and (iv) “in-the-money” value of vested stock options, based upon the spread between the exercise price and the current stock price. Unvested stock options and unearned performance based restricted stock units are not counted.

In addition, pursuant to the Company’s Insider Trading and Prohibition of Hedging and Pledging Policy (available on the “Investor Relations” page at www.becn.com), Company directors, officers, employees and members of their households may not enter into hedging or monetization transactions or similar arrangements with respect to Company securities, including the purchase or sale of puts or calls or the use of any other derivative instruments, nor may they hold Company securities in a margin account or pledge Company stock as collateral for a loan.

Retirement and Executive Life Insurance Plans

The Company sponsors a tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan, which covers substantially all of our U.S. employees, including our named executive officers. We currently provide a match of 50% of participants’ before-tax contributions up to 3% of eligible compensation. During fiscal year 2021, we contributed a match for each of the named executives other than Mr. Bennett. Additional annual profit-sharing contributions may be made at the discretion of the Board of Directors but were not made for fiscal year 2021.

Our named executive officers do not participate in any special or separate executive retirement plans. We consider our 401(k) plan to be an important factor in our ability to hire, retain and motivate our employees by providing an added measure of financial security for our employees.

The Company provides an executive life insurance benefits program for the named executive officers and other key executives. The program provides life insurance at a coverage level of three times (3x) base salary up to $2.0 million. The Company subsidizes the required premium payments for each employee.

Perquisites

We have no formal perquisites program. Personal benefits may be provided from time to time when we determine that such personal benefits are a useful part of an executive’s compensation package. Specifically, we have agreed to provide each of the named executive officers with a monthly auto allowance of $1,000 and reimbursement of their fuel costs and other driving expenses. As part of his offer to join the Company, Mr. Francis was provided relocation assistance to support his relocation to the Company’s headquarters office in Herndon, Virginia. Mr. Taylor was asked by the Company to relocate to the Company’s office location in Dallas, Texas in connection with his promotion to President, West Division. Accordingly, Mr. Taylor received relocation assistance which ran through the third quarter of fiscal year 2021.

Tax Deductibility of Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code as in effect for fiscal years prior to 2018 limited the deductibility of executive compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and to each of the three other most highly compensated officers of a public company (other than the Chief Financial Officer) who are named executive officers to $1 million per year. However, compensation that was considered qualified “performance-based compensation” generally did not count toward the $1 million deduction limit.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 amended Section 162(m) to cover a public company’s chief financial officer and eliminated the performance-based exception. Accordingly, the Company’s grants of stock options, performance-based restricted stock units and

- 33 -


annual cash incentive payments made for fiscal year 2018 and later years no longer qualify for this exception. Under a transition rule, outstanding stock options and performance-based restricted stock units will not be subject to Section 162(m) as amended to the extent such compensation is considered paid pursuant to a binding written contract in effect as of November 2, 2017. There are no outstanding performance-based restricted stock unit awards subject to the Section 162(m) transition rule.

The Compensation Committee takes into consideration the potential deductibility of the compensation as one of the factors to be considered when establishing our executive compensation program. However, the Compensation Committee believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that attracts, retains, and rewards our executive officers that are critical to our success. Following the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the Compensation Committee may continue to consider tax deductibility as a factor in determining executive compensation but may not structure its compensation arrangements around tax deductibility. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor the effect of tax reform on our executive compensation program.

Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy

In the event of (i) a financial restatement or (ii) misconduct by a named executive officer, an officer who is a member of our Executive Committee, or a Section 16 officer, the Compensation Committee will review all incentive compensation paid, awarded or granted on or after January 1, 2022 to the involved officer. The Compensation Committee (with the assistance of independent counsel in the case of misconduct) can recommend that a decision be made by the non-employee members of the Board to recoup from the officer all or a portion of the following incentive compensation:

For fiscal year 2017, the Company achieved AEBT of approximately $283.4 million, compared to an established target of approximately $292.9 million for the named executives. Our Board of Directors established the annual AEBT target based on market conditions and reasonable rates of expected annual growth. Based on the Company’s actual AEBT results above target, each participant earned a total of 85% of the AEBT portion of their target incentive. The qualitative portions of the performance bonus are described below. The incentive amounts paid to each named executive officer for fiscal year 2017 are set forth below in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” Total incentives earned for fiscal year 2017, comprised of the incentive resulting from the Company’s achievement of AEBT and their individual qualitative performance evaluations, were $158,400 for Mr. Buck, $704,000 for Mr. Isabella, $228,501 for Mr. Nowicki and $194,978 for Mr. Cooper.

In addition to the duties and responsibilities associated with their executive positions, each of our named executive officers are assigned specific strategic performance goals in order to qualify for part or all of a 20% portion of their target incentive amount. If the goal objectives are exceeded, each named executive office can receive an additional incentive. For fiscal year 2017, these specific management objectives were largely equally weighted and are described below, along with the percentage of the target incentive amount earned by the complete achievement of the objective. In each case, each percentage can increase up to 20% (for example, 5% can be increased to 6%) if the performance criteria for the goal objective is exceeded.

Mr. Buck — in addition to providing strategic direction to the Company, its executive team, and its Board of Directors, and providing guidance to the Company’s investor relations efforts, Mr. Buck’s specific fiscal year 2017 goals were:

23


enhance the Company’s growth objectives by continuing to identify and meeting with acquisition candidates and leading the Company’s acquisition efforts by further developing relationships, negotiating transaction terms and providing guidance during the financial analysis and closing processes (6.67%). Mr. Buck achieved this goal by facilitating the Company’s successful acquisitions during the fiscal year, including oversight, advice and guidance with due diligence and integration planning;

provide direction, advice and counsel to the Company’s CEO on the Company’s long-term strategic plan and the achievement of organic growth and growth through acquisitions (6.67%). Mr. Buck achieved this goal through regular interaction with our CEO, with the development of the Company’s long-term strategic plan and the organic and acquisition growth objectives of the Company. During the fiscal year, the Company achieved record sales and completed five acquisitions and announced the acquisition of Allied Building Products; and

focus on talent development and succession planning of the Company’s executive management team to ensure that it has the capability and capacity to lead the Company into the future (6.66%). Mr. Buck achieved this goal through regular updates to the Board of Directors and ongoing interaction with members of the Company’s executive leadership team in which he provided advice and guidance to assist with their professional development and the overall achievement of individual and financial performance goals and the overall performance of their respective divisions and/or functional departments.

Mr. Isabella — in addition to his responsibility to lead and manage all aspects of the Company’s operational and financial performance, including vendor relations, safety, human resources, sales and marketing, credit, legal and investor relations, Mr. Isabella’s specific fiscal year 2017 goals were:

develop and refine the Company’s long-term strategic plan and ensure mechanisms are in place to implement and track the progress of the achievement of the plan’s objectives (5.0%). Mr. Isabella achieved this goal by leading strategic plan revision sessions that resulted in the successful development, alignment, communication and implementation of the fiscal year 2017 elements of the Company’s long-term strategic plan objectives;

develop and evaluate the company structure and operating model options, leadership skills and succession potential of the Company’s senior divisional leaders by working closely with the Chief Human Resources Officer to identify performance objectives, provide relevant coaching and development plans, and evaluate the progress of and provide feedback to the Company’s senior divisional leaders (5.0%). Mr. Isabella achieved this goal by developing specific development plans and performance objectives with metrics by which to gauge the progress of our divisional executives and C-Suite leaders, providing continued Board of Directors and investment community exposure as they worked to achieve their goals, and providing ongoing detailed feedback and evaluation of the members of the senior divisional leadership team;

dedicate time and resources to mentor and develop the new Chief Sales and Marketing Officer to include: structural optimization, organizational competency development, strategic organic growth planning & execution, and customer relationship management maturity (5.0%). Mr. Isabella successfully achieved this goal by leading and mentoring the new Chief Sales and Marketing Officer and providing oversight and guidance to assist with the ongoing development and implementation of the Company’s strategic organic growth strategy; and

lead the due diligence and integration planning for the announced Allied Building Products acquisition (5.0%). Mr. Isabella achieved this goal by establishing and monitoring the due diligence and integration planning processes, providing leadership, direction, advice and counsel to all internal and external constituents participating in the Allied Building Products acquisition planning.

24


Mr. Nowicki — in addition to being responsible for all aspects of the Company’s financial management and reporting, leading and managing the Company’s corporate financial department, and providing guidance and oversight to the Company’s regional financial teams, Mr. Nowicki’s specific fiscal year 2017 goals were:

strengthen financial organizational capability and depth through the implementation of functional maturity diagnostic process (5.0%). Mr. Nowicki achieved this goal by successfully conducting an internal assessment along with effective use of external support and tools per plan;

complete the Company’s annual Finance organization & people review and performance management processes per established schedule to ensure the Finance function is prepared to support the company growth objectives (5.0%). Mr. Nowicki successfully completed this program within the designated timeframe;

participate in executive assessment and development process (5.0%). Mr. Nowicki achieved this goal by    completing an externally sponsored assessment and implementing recommended actions; and

support the company strategic and structural objectives through participation in field business review sessions to support the identification and facilitation of key actions (5.0%). Mr. Nowicki successfully achieved this goal by participating in scheduled regional field sessions per plan.

Mr. Cooper — in addition to being responsible for the management of the Company’s legal affairs, including claims management, commercial leasing, labor relations, contract review, and negotiation and documentation of acquisitions, Mr. Cooper’s specific fiscal year 2017 goals were:

recruit, hire and assimilate a VP-level Associate General Counsel to build succession (5.0%). Mr. Cooper successfully completed this goal by recruiting, hiring and assimilating an experienced deputy with both private practice and corporate experience;

complete the Company’s annual Legal organization & people review and performance management processes per established schedule to ensure the Legal function is prepared to support the company growth objectives (5.0%). Mr. Cooper successfully completed this program within the designated timeframe;

participate in executive assessment and development process (5.0%). Mr. Cooper achieved this goal by completing an externally sponsored assessment and implementing recommended actions; and

attend investor and customer events per established schedule (5.0%). Mr. Cooper achieved this goal by engaging in several investor and customer events throughout the year.

Each of the above named executive officer’s respective specific management objectives reflect our focus on continued growth and improvement in execution over our past performance. In light of that focus, the Compensation Committee reviewed the level of achievement of the Chairman and CEO’s specific management objectives set forth above. The CEO reviewed the level of achievement of Mr. Nowicki’s and Mr. Cooper’s specific management objectives set forth above and reported his recommendations to the Compensation Committee. After careful consideration of the outcomes, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors the payment of the bonus awards in the amounts set forth in the narrative above and in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading “Non-equity incentive plan compensation.”

The management cash incentive plan works in conjunction with the Senior Executive Incentive Plan, or SEIP, which acts as an overlay to the management cash incentive plan and sets a performance-based ceiling on the incentives paid under the management cash incentive plan, so that they meet the deductibility requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code in effect for fiscal year 2017. For fiscal year 2017, the SEIP covered Mr. Buck, Mr. Isabella and Mr. Cooper. (CFOs were not subject to Section 162(m) in fiscal year 2017). With AEBT as the performance metric, the Compensation Committee established an award fund under the SEIP equal to 5% of AEBT, with each participant being allocated a maximum allowable percent of the award fund. The Committee utilizes the criteria in the management cash incentive plan in its exercise of negative discretion to determine the final payout to the each participant, which may not exceed the portion of the award fund allocated to such participant.

In addition to the management cash incentive plan, the Compensation Committee retains full discretion to award discretionary bonuses to the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and others to reward extraordinary efforts by

25


executive officers in various projects or initiatives during the year. The Compensation Committee considers the Chairman’s and Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations in determining discretionary cash awards for our other named executive officers.

Equity Compensation

The third element of our compensation program is equity compensation. Equity compensation is intended to more closely align total compensation with the long-term financial interests of our shareholders. The equity compensation component of our compensation program is based upon awards of stock options and other stock awards.

Our Compensation Committee administers our stock plan. The purpose of the stock plan is to advance the interests of our shareholders by aligning compensation to the long term performance results of the Company by:

providing directors, officers, employees and other eligible persons with additional incentives;

encouraging stock ownership by eligible persons;

increasing the proprietary interests of eligible persons in the success of the Company;

encouraging eligible persons to remain with the Company or its affiliates; and

attracting new employees, officers or directors to the Company or its affiliates.

In determining whether to grant stock options and other stock awards, and how many of such to grant to eligible persons under our stock plan, consideration is given to each individual’s past performance and contribution to the Company, as well as that individual’s expected ability to contribute to the Company in the future. As part of the Company’s annual performance evaluation process each year, the CEO, after consultation with each other named executive, establishes that named executive’s performance objectives for the coming year. These performance objectives are not intended to be rigid or formulaic, but rather to serve as the framework upon which the CEO evaluates the executive’s overall performance. Individual performance objectives may include operational metrics that may reflect corporate or departmental goals or may include specific operational objectives with respect to the executive’s area of responsibility. These performance objectives also include the demonstration of leadership and decision making, effective communication, promotion of the Company’s strategic initiatives and values, commitment to excellence and work ethic and may include more specific objectives for the executive, such as the successful completion of major projects, successful integration of acquisitions, and organization capability building. The CEO’s evaluation of an executive’s performance relative to these objectives is inherently subjective, involving a high degree of judgment based on the CEO’s observations of, and interaction with, the executive throughout the year. The CEO also considers the executive’s prospects for future development and advancement within the Company in formulating an equity compensation recommendation. As an additional input to the CEO’s evaluation of an executive’s performance, the CEO assesses the overall performance of the Company in light of the dynamics of the markets in which the Company competes. As a result, no single performance objective or group of objectives is material to the CEO’s evaluation of the executive’s performance.

The above evaluation provides the basis for the CEO’s recommendation to the Compensation Committee of equity compensation for each named executive. The Compensation Committee meets with the CEO and discusses the CEO’s recommendations before meeting separately in executive session to discuss the CEO’s recommendations and making a final determination of the equity compensation to the named executives. The Compensation Committee applies similar factors in determining the equity compensation to the Chairman and the CEO. The Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the Chairman’s and CEO’s overall performance relative to these factors also is inherently subjective, involving a high degree of judgment. As additional input to the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the Chairman and CEO’s performance, the Compensation Committee assesses the overall performance of the Company in light of the dynamics of the markets in which the Company competes. As a result, no single performance objective or group of objectives is material to the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the Chairman’s and CEO’s performance.

Since the Company’s initial public offering and through fiscal year 2017, non-qualified stock options have been granted to key members of management at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported by Nasdaq on the date of grant. Accordingly, grants of stock options will produce value

26


only if there are increases in the underlying stock price. In fiscal year 2011, we began issuing performance-based restricted stock unit awards to certain key members of management. Beginning in fiscal year 2014, we also began issuing time-based restricted stock unit awards to certain key members of management. Similar to stock options, we believe that restricted stock unit awards reward performance because the value of the stock is also linked to our Company’s long-term performance. The Compensation Committee believes that restricted stock unit awards can play an important retentive and motivational role that stock options alone may not.

The Company’s annual equity awards are typically made by the Compensation Committee in November of each year following the close of the Company’s fiscal year and subsequent to the approval of the annual budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Company typically does not make stock option and other stock awards other than annually, except in certain cases for key members of management hired during the course of a year or to improve the retention of key management members.

On November 18, 2016 (“Q1 2017”), the Compensation Committee authorized awards of stock options, performance-based restricted stock units and time-based restricted stock units to our named executive officers and a number of other key employees, using the recommendations from Cook & Co. and other considerations described above. For our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee set a target equity award value based upon recommendations from Cook & Co., which reviewed peer group data, and taking into account the Black-Scholes valuation of each named executive officer’s equity awards in prior years. Of that target value, and pursuant to the guidelines approved by our Board, approximately 50 percent of the target value was represented by performance-based restricted units, approximately 25 percent in time-based restricted units and approximately 25 percent in stock options. Under this methodology, the awards to each of our named executive officers were as follows:

Mr. Buck was granted options to acquire 8,797 common shares (3.6% of the total Q1 2017 management option grant) and 7,911 restricted stock units (3.1% of the total Q1 2017 restricted stock award, composed of 2,637 time-based restricted stock units and 5,274 performance-based restricted stock units). These grants were based on the factors described above and Mr. Buck’s leadership role as Chairman and his direct influence on the extent of our continued future growth via the pursuit of acquisitions, direction and counsel to Mr. Isabella, and assistance with other executive development.

Mr. Isabella was granted options to acquire 35,186 common shares (14.3% of the total Q1 2017 management option grant) and 31,646 restricted stock units (12.6% of the total Q1 2017 restricted stock award, composed of 10,549 time-based restricted stock units and 21,097 performance-based restricted stock units). These grants were based on the factors described above and Mr. Isabella’s leadership role as CEO and his ability to drive our continued future operational growth and success, as well as organizational optimization and maintaining positive investor relations.

Mr. Nowicki was granted options to acquire 9,896 common shares (4.0% of the total Q1 2017 management option grant) and 8,901 restricted stock units (3.5% of the total Q1 2017 restricted stock award, composed of 2,967 time-based restricted stock units and 5,934 performance-based restricted stock units). These grants were based on the factors described above and Mr. Nowicki’s key role as CFO and his position to assist with our continued future operational growth and success, as well as formulating the proper future capital structure and maintaining positive investor relationships.

Mr. Cooper was granted options to acquire 5,278 common shares (2.1% of the total Q1 2017 management option grant) and 4,747 restricted stock units (1.9% of the total Q1 2017 restricted stock award, composed of 1,582 time-based restricted stock units and 3,165 performance-based restricted stock units). These grants were based on the factors described above and Mr. Cooper’s key role as General Counsel and his position in assisting with our continued future growth, including assisting with all acquisitions, as well as monitoring company-wide legal compliance.

The stock option awards granted to our named executive officers in Q1 2017 had an exercise price of $47.40, vest one-third annually starting on the first anniversary of the grant, and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. The time-based restricted stock unit awards granted to our named executive officers will vest and convert into common shares upon the third anniversary of the date of grant.

27


The performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted to our named executive officers will vest and convert upon the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the Company achieving a cumulative two-year Adjusted EPS target and average organic net sales growth rate target, each weighted at 50%, at the end of the two-year measurement period ending September 30, 2018. The actual number of those units that will vest can range from 0% to 150% of the award target, depending upon actual company performance, weighted for each metric, above or below the target level. If the weighted-average achievement of the Adjusted EPS target is at or less than 80% of target, no units associated with this target will vest. If the weighted-average achievement of the Adjusted EPS target is 100% of target, 100% of the units associated with this target will vest. If the weighted-average achievement of the Adjusted EPS target is 120% or more of target, 150% of the units associated with this target will vest. Weighted-average achievement of the Adjusted EPS target between 80% and 100% and between 100% and 120% will be adjusted on the basis of straight-line interpolation. If the weighted-average achievement of the average organic net sales growth rate target is at or less than 50% of target, no units associated with this target will vest. If the weighted-average achievement of the average organic net sales growth rate target is 100% of target, 100% of the units associated with this target will vest. If the weighted-average achievement of the average organic net sales growth rate target is 150% or more of target, 150% of the units associated with this target will vest. Weighted-average achievement of the of the average organic net sales growth rate target between 50% and 100% and between 100% and 150% will be adjusted on the basis of straight-line interpolation.

On November 22, 2016, the performance-based restricted stock awards that were granted in fiscal year 2014 vested. The three-year average ROIC target for this grant was 9.0%. The Company achieved an actual three-year ROIC of 6.3% over the vesting period and as a result, the grant did not result in any settlement of shares.

Employment Agreements

There are no employment, severance or change-in-control agreements currently entered into by and between any current executive and the Company.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our named executive officers and members of our Corporate Executive Council (consisting of divisional executive vice presidents and corporate executive vice presidents and vice presidents) are expected to own stock of the Company having a value set forth below:

CEO = 5 times annual base salary

Named executive officers and Corporate Executive Council members = 2 times annual base salary

Until the ownership level is met, executives are required to retain 50% of net profit shares attributable to stock option exercises or vesting of restricted stock units until the specified ownership level is attained. Profit shares represent the shares remaining after payment of applicable tax obligations and, in the case of stock options, payment of the stock option exercise price. There is no defined time period to meet the stock ownership requirement. Participants may satisfy their ownership guidelines with (i) shares directly owned, (ii) shares held in the Company 401(k) plan, (iii) time vested restricted stock units (which settle in stock), even if not vested and (iv) “in-the-money” value of vested stock options, based upon the spread between the exercise price and the current stock price. Unvested stock options and unearned performance based restricted stock units are not counted.

In addition, pursuant to the Company’s Insider Trading and Prohibition of Hedging and Pledging Policy (available on the “Investor Relations” page at www.becn.com), Company officers, directors, and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging and pledging shares of Company stock.

Retirement Plans

We sponsor a defined contribution 401(k) plan, which covers substantially all of our U.S. employees, including our named executive officers. We currently provide a match of 50% of participants’ before-tax contributions up to 3% of eligible compensation. During fiscal year 2017, we contributed a match for each of the named executives. Additional annual profit-sharing contributions may be made at the discretion of the Board of Directors but were not made for fiscal year 2017.

28


Our named executive officers do not participate in any special or separate executive retirement plans. We consider our 401(k) plan to be an important factor in our ability to hire, retain and motivate our employees by providing an added measure of financial security for our employees.

Perquisites

We have no formal perquisites program. Personal benefits may be provided from time to time when we determine that such personal benefits are a useful part of an executive’s compensation package. Specifically, we have agreed to provide each of the named executive officers with a monthly auto allowance of $1,000 and reimbursement of their fuel costs.

Tax Deductibility of Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code generally precludes a public corporation from taking a deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million for its chief executive officer and other specified officers, unless, in addition to other requirements, the compensation qualifies as performance based compensation. The Company is currently entitled to a deduction in connection with options exercised under our stock option plan by such executive officers and the vesting of performance-based restricted stock with respect to awards outstanding as of September 30, 2017, and in connection with annual incentive awards paid for fiscal year 2017 to the named executive officers eligible to participate in the SEIP. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed into law in December, 2017, eliminates our ability to deduct performance based compensation in excess of $1 million with respect to stock based awards granted after September 30, 2017 and annual incentive awards paid for fiscal year 2018 and later years.

Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy

In the event of a financial statement restatement resulting from misconduct by a named executive officers or an officer who is a member of our Corporate Executive Council, the Compensation Committee will review all incentive compensation paid, awarded or granted on or after January 1, 2017 to the involved officer. In its sole discretion, the Compensation Committee can decide to recoup from the officer all or a portion of the following incentive compensation:

Incentive Plan: The Compensation Committee can recommend that the non-employee members of the Board (i) cancel and forfeit the officer’s annual incentive opportunity for the then current plan year, and/or (ii) require repayment of any incentive awards previously paid for prior years within the recoupment period described below.

Equity: The Compensation Committee can recommend that the non-employee members of the Board (i) cancel and forfeit any outstanding equity awards, (ii) require the officer to return a number of shares of Company stock received upon vesting and settlement of any restricted stock unit awards during the recoupment period described below (or pay the cash value of such shares), and (iii) require the officer to return a number of shares received upon the exercise of any stock options during the recoupment period described below (or pay the cash value of such shares).

The Compensation Committee may seek recoupment if the officer’s misconduct occurs within 36 months following the payment, vesting or award of the incentive compensation.

The Compensation Committee may recommend recoupment for incentive compensation that is paid, vested or awarded to the officer within 36 months preceding the date the Company determines the restatement obligation or the officer’s misconduct.

For incentive compensation paid, awarded or granted on or after January 1, 2017 and before January 1, 2022, the Compensation Committee may also recoup incentive compensation under our prior policy, but only in the event of a financial restatement resulting from misconduct.

All named executive officers and members of the Executive Committee have agreed to the terms of this policy.

Report of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement with management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section be included in this Proxy Statement.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:

Neil S. Novich, Chair

Richard W. Frost

Alan Gershenhorn

Robert M. McLaughlin

Douglas L. Young

All named executive officers and members of the Corporate Executive Council have agreed to the terms of this policy.

Report of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Disclosure and Analysis” section of this proxy statement with management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section be included in this proxy statement.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:

Neil S. Novich, Chairman

Richard W. Frost

Alan Gershenhorn

29


Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth all compensation earned during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, by each person who served as our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer during fiscal year 2017, and by our other executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year, collectively referred to as our named executive officers:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and principal position

 

Fiscal Year

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus(1)

($)

 

 

Stock Awards(2)

($)

 

 

Option Awards(3)

($)

 

 

Non-equity incentive plan compensation(4) ($)

 

 

All other compensation(5) ($)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Robert R. Buck

 

2017

 

$

300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

374,981

 

 

$

124,987

 

 

$

158,400

 

 

$

23,243

 

 

$

981,611

 

   Chairman

 

2016

 

 

311,538

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

252,015

 

 

 

62,999

 

 

 

180,000

 

 

 

26,096

 

 

 

832,648

 

 

 

2015

 

 

300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

188,680

 

 

 

43,679

 

 

 

135,000

 

 

 

23,292

 

 

 

690,651

 

Paul M. Isabella

 

2017

 

$

773,077

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,500,020

 

 

$

499,919

 

 

$

704,000

 

 

$

27,118

 

 

$

3,504,134

 

   President and Chief

 

2016

 

 

710,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,399,992

 

 

 

350,003

 

 

 

1,036,000

 

 

 

27,580

 

 

 

3,523,575

 

   Executive Officer

 

2015

 

 

640,385

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

945,005

 

 

 

218,789

 

 

 

483,750

 

 

 

31,801

 

 

 

2,319,730

 

Joseph M. Nowicki

 

2017

 

$

469,617

 

 

$

120,000

 

 

$

421,907

 

 

$

140,601

 

 

$

228,501

 

 

$

26,164

 

 

$

1,406,790

 

   Executive Vice President and

 

2016

 

 

475,176

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

449,482

 

 

 

113,000

 

 

 

333,485

 

 

 

26,471

 

 

 

1,397,614

 

   Chief Financial Officer

 

2015

 

 

440,419

 

 

 

120,000

 

 

 

400,008

 

 

 

69,457

 

 

 

166,894

 

 

 

25,340

 

 

 

1,222,118

 

Ross D. Cooper

 

2017

 

$

440,791

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

$

225,008

 

 

$

74,989

 

 

$

194,978

 

 

$

24,928

 

 

$

1,060,694

 

   Executive Vice President,

 

2016

 

 

447,891

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

252,015

 

 

 

62,999

 

 

 

265,879

 

 

 

22,557

 

 

 

1,051,341

 

    General Counsel and Secretary

 

2015

 

 

421,289

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

271,758

 

 

 

39,764

 

 

 

123,975

 

 

 

24,595

 

 

 

981,381

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 34 -


(1)

These amounts reflect a bonus paid during the first quarter of the following fiscal year, for services rendered in fiscal year 2015 in connection with the negotiation and closing of the RSG acquisition and for services rendered in fiscal year 2017 in connection with the negotiation of the Allied acquisition.

(2)

These amounts represent the estimated grant date fair value of time-based and performance-based restricted stock unit awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. They are recognized by the Company as share-based compensation expense over a three-year period. Assuming performance-based restricted stock units vest at the maximum level, the grant date values of fiscal year 2017 performance-based restricted stock units would be as follows: Mr. Buck: $374,981; Mr. Isabella: $1,499,997; Mr. Nowicki: $421,907; Mr. Cooper: $225,032. For additional information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards and the calculation methods, please refer to Note 2 of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2017.

(3)

These amounts represent the grant date fair value of the stock options computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. They are recognized by the Company as share-based compensation expense over the three-year vesting period. For additional information, please refer to Note 2 of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2017.

(4)

These amounts represent the annual cash incentives that were paid during the first quarter of the following fiscal year.

(5)

These amounts include Company matching and profit-sharing contributions to the 401(k) plan (combined fiscal year 2017 totals of $10,500 for Mr. Buck, $12,000 for Mr. Isabella, $11,040 for Mr. Cooper and $12,224 for Mr. Nowicki) along with auto allowance and fuel cost reimbursement.

Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth all compensation earned during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, 2020, and 2019, by each person who served as our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer during fiscal year 2021, and by our three next most highly compensated executive officers, who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year, collectively referred to as our named executive officers:

 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE 

Name and principal position1

  Fiscal
year
 Salary
($)
 Bonus2
($)
 Stock
awards3

($)
 Option
awards4

($)
 Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation5

($)
 All other
compensation6

($)
 Total
($)
 

Julian G. Francis

   2021    $ 810,673    $-    $ 2,287,523    $  762,506    $      1,705,795    $95,421    $5,661,918   

President and

   2020   753,846   -   1,800,017   599,995   768,000           184,060       4,105,918   

Chief Executive Officer

   2019   113,846     568,110   1,649,984   649,995   109,534   49,675   3,141,144   
         

Frank A. Lonegro

   2021  $557,827  $-  $757,498  $252,498  $825,792  $29,078  $2,422,693   

Executive Vice President

   2020   211,538   8,423   899,996   300,000   189,269   7,671   1,616,897   

and Chief Financial Officer

         
         

Jonathan S. Bennett

   2021  $170,154  $-  $1,200,025  $-  $201,031  $3,692  $1,574,902   

Executive Vice President

         

and Chief Commercial Officer

         
         

C. Munroe Best

   2021  $457,460  $-  $337,477  $112,493  $498,243  $24,400  $1,430,073   

President, South Division

         
         

Jason L. Taylor

   2021  $395,385  $25,000  $224,985  $75,006  $432,000  $259,034  $1,411,409   

President, West Division

         
                                  

 

 

1

30Compensation for the individuals named below is excluded for those fiscal years in which they were not named executive officers.


2

For fiscal year 2021, Mr. Taylor’s amount constitutes a retention award.

3

These amounts represent the estimated grant date fair value of time-based and performance-based restricted stock unit awards, in each case computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. In the case of the performance-based restricted stock units, this value is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. The awards are recognized by the Company as share-based compensation expense over a three-year period. Assuming performance-based restricted stock units vest at the maximum level, which is 200% of the target, the grant date values of fiscal year 2021 performance-based restricted stock units plus the grant date values of fiscal year 2021 time-based restricted stock units would be as follows: Mr. Francis — $3,812,538; Mr. Lonegro — $1,262,497; Mr. Best — $562,461; and Mr. Taylor — $374,975. All of Mr. Bennett’s awards consisted of time-based restricted stock units. For additional information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of stock awards, please refer to Notes 2 and 6 of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2021.

4

These amounts represent the grant date fair value of the stock options computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. They are recognized by the Company as share-based compensation expense over the three-year vesting period. For additional information, please refer to Notes 2 and 6 of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2021.

5

These amounts represent the annual cash incentives that were paid during the first quarter of the following fiscal year.

6

These amounts include Company matching contributions to the 401(k) plan (combined fiscal year 2021 totals of $8,550 for Mr. Francis, $14,506 for Mr. Lonegro, $8,152 for Mr. Best, and $9,333 for Mr. Taylor) along with executive life insurance payments (including tax gross-up), auto allowance, fuel cost reimbursement and other driving expenses. Mr. Francis’ amount also includes a relocation reimbursement of $66,501 (including a tax gross-up of $29,992). Mr. Taylor’s amount also includes a relocation reimbursement of $235,681 (including a tax gross-up of $88,083).

- 35 -


The following table sets forth the individual grants of plan-based awards to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017:

FISCAL YEAR 2017 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

 

 

 

 

Estimated future payouts under

non-equity incentive plan awards (1)

 

 

Estimated future payouts under

equity incentive plan awards (2)

 

 

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (3)

 

 

All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities  Underlying Options (4)

 

 

Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards

 

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (5)

 

 

 

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Grant date

 

($)

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

(#)

 

(#)

 

 

(#)

 

 

(#)

 

 

(#)

 

 

($/share)

 

 

($)

 

Robert R. Buck

 

 

 

 

$

180,000

 

 

$

180,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,797

 

 

$

47.40

 

 

$

124,987

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,637

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

124,994

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,274

 

 

 

7,911

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

249,988

 

Paul M. Isabella

 

 

 

 

$

800,000

 

 

$

1,472,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,186

 

 

$

47.40

 

 

$

499,919

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,549

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,023

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,097

 

 

 

31,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

999,998

 

Joseph M. Nowicki

 

 

 

 

$

259,660

 

 

$

477,774

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,896

 

 

$

47.40

 

 

$

140,601

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,967

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

140,636

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,934

 

 

 

8,901

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

281,272

 

Ross D. Cooper

 

 

 

 

$

221,565

 

 

$

407,680

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,278

 

 

$

47.40

 

 

$

74,989

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,582

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74,987

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,165

 

 

 

4,748

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

150,021

 

(1)

These non-equity incentive plan awards were based on Company-wide AEBT and individual performance. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Annual Cash Incentives.”

(2)

The vesting of these restricted stock units is subject to both performance-based and time-based requirements. The performance-based metrics are satisfied upon the Company meeting a cumulative two-year Adjusted EPS target and average organic net sales growth rate target for fiscal years 2017 and 2018, each weighted at 50%, and the units can vest at a percentage equal to 0% to 150% of the target. The time-based vesting requirement is satisfied on the third anniversary of the grant date. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Equity Compensation.”

(3)

The time-based restricted stock units granted November 2016 will vest and convert into common shares upon the third anniversary of the grant date.

(4)

These stock options vest (become exercisable) in three annual installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, and expire ten years from the date of grant. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Equity Compensation.”

(5)

These amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock options and restricted units awarded to the named executive officers in fiscal year 2017, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are included in Note 11 of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2017.

31


The following table sets forth details of all of the outstanding equity awards of the named executive officers as of September 30, 2017:

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

 

 

 

 

Option Awards (1)

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Grant date

 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#)

exercisable

 

 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#)

unexercisable

 

 

Option

exercise

price

($)

 

 

Option

expiration

date

 

Number of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested (2)

(#)

 

 

Market

value of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested

($)

 

 

Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have

not vested (3)

(#)

 

 

Equity incentive plan awards: market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have

not vested

($)

 

Robert R. Buck

 

11/18/2011

 

 

2,004

 

 

 

 

 

$

18.72

 

 

11/18/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/14/2012

 

 

3,218

 

 

 

 

 

$

30.15

 

 

11/14/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/22/2013

 

 

4,736

 

 

 

 

 

$

36.19

 

 

11/22/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

3,094

 

 

 

1,547

 

 

$

28.64

 

 

11/21/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,196

 

 

$

112,545

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,392

 

 

$

225,090

 

 

 

11/20/2015

 

 

1,716

 

 

 

3,431

 

 

$

37.89

 

 

11/20/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/20/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,663

 

 

$

85,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,562

 

 

$

233,803

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

8,797

 

 

$

47.40

 

 

11/18/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,637

 

 

$

135,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,274

 

 

$

270,293

 

Paul M. Isabella

 

10/22/2008

 

 

40,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

12.25

 

 

10/22/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/6/2009

 

 

31,100

 

 

 

 

 

$

14.45

 

 

11/6/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/16/2010

 

 

12,019

 

 

 

 

 

$

15.47

 

 

11/16/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/1/2011

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

17.87

 

 

1/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2011

 

 

22,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

18.72

 

 

11/18/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/14/2012

 

 

17,659

 

 

 

 

 

$

30.15

 

 

11/14/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/22/2013

 

 

23,722

 

 

 

 

 

$

36.19

 

 

11/22/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

15,498

 

 

 

7,749

 

 

$

28.64

 

 

11/21/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,999

 

 

$

563,699

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,997

 

 

$

1,127,346

 

 

 

11/20/2015

 

 

9,532

 

 

 

19,063

 

 

$

37.89

 

 

11/20/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/20/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,237

 

 

$

473,396

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,344

 

 

$

1,298,880

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

35,186

 

 

$

47.40

 

 

11/18/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,549

 

 

$

540,636

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,097

 

 

$

1,081,221

 

Joseph M. Nowicki

 

3/25/2013

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

38.43

 

 

3/25/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/22/2013

 

 

7,531

 

 

 

 

 

$

36.19

 

 

11/22/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/22/2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,573

 

(4)

$

746,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

4,920

 

 

 

2,460

 

 

$

28.64

 

 

11/21/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,492

 

 

$

178,965

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,983

 

 

$

357,879

 

 

 

11/20/2015

 

 

3,078

 

 

 

6,154

 

 

$

37.89

 

 

11/20/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/20/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,982

 

 

$

152,828

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,122

 

 

$

416,253

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

9,896

 

 

$

47.40

 

 

11/18/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,967

 

 

$

152,059

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,934

 

 

$

304,118

 

Ross D. Cooper

 

11/14/2012

 

 

4,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

30.15

 

 

11/14/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/22/2013

 

 

4,311

 

 

 

 

 

$

36.19

 

 

11/22/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

2,817

 

 

 

1,408

 

 

$

28.64

 

 

11/21/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,999

 

 

$

102,449

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/21/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,998

 

 

$

204,898

 

 

 

11/20/2015

 

 

1,716

 

 

 

3,431

 

 

$

37.89

 

 

11/20/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/20/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,663

 

 

$

85,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,596

 

 

$

184,295

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

5,278

 

 

$

47.40

 

 

11/18/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,582

 

 

$

81,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/18/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,165

 

 

$

162,206

 

32


(1)

All stock options granted under our 2004 Stock Plan and our 2014 Stock Plan vest in three annual installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date.

(2)

These time-based restricted stock units will vest and convert into common shares upon the third anniversary of the grant date, unless noted otherwise. The total market value is based on the price of our common stock of $51.25 per share at the end of fiscal year 2017.

(3)

These restricted stock units vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the Company meeting defined performance metrics. These restricted stock units vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. The total market value is based on the price of our common stock of $51.25 per share at the end of fiscal year 2017 and vesting at target.

(4)

These time-based restricted stock units have been granted by the Compensation Committee to encourage Mr. Nowicki to remain with the Company long term and represent units that will vest and convert into common shares upon the fifth anniversary of the grant date.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

There were no stock option awards exercised by the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021:

 
FISCAL YEAR 2021 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS 
  Grant
date
  

 

Estimated future payouts under

non-equity incentive plan awards1

  

 

Estimated future payouts under

equity incentive plan awards2

  All
other
stock
awards:
number
of
shares
of stock
or

units3
(#)
  All other
option
awards:
number of
securities
underlying

options4
(#)
  Exercise
or base
price
of option

awards
($/share)
  Grant
date fair
value of
stock and
option

awards5
($)
 

Name

 Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 

Julian G. Francis

 

 

 

 

 $            -  $  937,250  $1,724,540  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  49,610  $35.78  $762,506   

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     42,622   85,244  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $1,525,015   

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  21,311  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $762,508   

Frank A. Lonegro

 

 

 

 

 $-  $448,800  $825,792  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  16,428  $35.78  $252,498   

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     14,114   28,228  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $504,999   

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  7,057  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $252,499   

Jonathan S. Bennett

 

 

 

 

 $-  $112,308  $206,647  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

  6/1/2021  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  20,870  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $1,200,025   

C. Munroe Best

 

 

 

 

 $-  $276,802  $509,315  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  7,319  $35.78  $112,493   

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     6,288   12,576  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $224,985   

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  3,144  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $112,492   

Jason L. Taylor

 

 

 

 

 $-  $240,000  $441,600  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  4,880  $35.78  $75,006   

 

  11/12/2020  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     4,192   8,384  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $149,990   
 

 

  11/12/2020   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  2,096   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 $74,995   

1

These non-equity incentive plan awards were based on AEBITDA (with Messrs. Francis, Lonegro and Bennett’s incentives based on a Company-wide target and Messrs. Best and Taylor’s incentives based on their respective division targets), a Company-wide average operating working capital as a percentage of sales and individual performance. Mr. Bennett’s award was based on a partial year of employment at the Company. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Annual Cash Incentives.”

2

These restricted stock units vest and convert into common shares after September 30, 2023, subject to the Company achieving certain Adjusted EPS and average organic net sales growth targets, each weighted at 50%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017. The following table sets forth certain information regarding shares acquired by stock awards vesting by2021, the named executive officers during the fiscal yeartwelve-month period ended September 30, 2017.

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of

shares acquired by stock awards vesting

(#)

 

 

Value realized

on vesting (1)

($)

 

Robert R. Buck

 

 

1,100

 

 

$

49,896

 

Paul M. Isabella

 

 

5,510

 

 

 

249,934

 

Joseph M. Nowicki

 

 

4,943

 

 

 

235,841

 

Ross D. Cooper

 

 

4,195

 

 

 

201,911

 

(1)

Values are calculated by multiplying the market prices on the dates of the vesting of the stock award by the number of common shares received on the vesting of such awards.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control

Equity Award Agreements

Pursuant2022 and the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2023, and the units can vest at a percentage equal to stock option agreements with our named executive officers, all of their outstanding stock options will vest upon death, disability or retirement (i.e., termination on or after age 65) and in the event of a change in control. Based on the price0% to 200% of the Company’s stock of $51.25 as of September 30, 2017,target. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the values of unvested stock options for the named executives as of that date (based on the difference between such stock price and the exercise prices) were as follows: Mr. Buck — $114,684, Mr. Isabella — $565,353, Mr. Nowicki — $175,938 and Mr. Cooper — $97,993.heading “Equity Compensation.”

3

Pursuant to restricted stock unit awards with our named executive officers,These time-based restricted stock units will vest and convert into common shares upon death or disability (at targetthe third anniversary of the grant date. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Equity Compensation.”

4

These stock options vest (become exercisable) in three annual installments on the casefirst, second and third anniversaries of performance-based awards). Basedthe grant date, and expire ten years from the date of grant. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Equity Compensation.”

5

These amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock options and restricted stock units awarded to the named executive officers in fiscal year 2021, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are included in Notes 2 and 6 of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2021.

- 36 -


The following table sets forth details of all of the outstanding equity awards of the named executive officers as of September 30, 2021:

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
      Option Awards1   Stock Awards 

Name

  Grant date  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options

(#)
exercisable
   Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options

(#)
unexercisable
   Option
exercise
price

($)
   Option
expiration

date
   Number
of shares
or units
of stock
that have
not
vested2
(#)
  Market
value of
shares or
units of
stock that
have not
vested ($)
   Equity
incentive plan
awards:
number of
unearned
shares, units
or other
rights that
have not
vested3

(#)
   Equity
incentive plan
awards:
market or
payout value
of unearned
shares, units
or other rights
that have not
vested

($)
 

Julian G. Francis

  8/22/2019   41,989    20,995   $31.16    8/22/2029        
  8/22/2019           11,2324  $536,440     
  11/12/2019   18,182    36,363   $33.47    11/12/2029        
  11/12/2019              35,853   $1,712,339 
  11/12/2019           17,927  $856,194     
  11/12/2020       49,610   $35.78    11/12/2030        
  11/12/2020              42,622   $2,035,627 
  11/12/2020           21,311  $1,017,813     

Frank A. Lonegro

  4/20/2020   14,265    28,531   $17.51    4/20/2030        
  4/20/2020           14,9915  $715,970     
  4/20/2020           21,416  $1,022,828     
  11/12/2020       16,428   $35.78    11/12/2030        
  11/12/2020              14,114   $674,085 
  11/12/2020           7,057  $337,042     

Jonathan S. Bennett

  6/1/2021           8,696  $415,321     
  6/1/2021           12,1746  $581,430     

C. Munroe Best

  11/14/2012   7,500       $30.15    11/14/2022        
  11/22/2013   4,895       $36.19    11/22/2023        
  11/21/2014   4,797       $28.64    11/21/2024        
  11/20/2015   5,637       $37.89    11/20/2025        
  11/18/2016   7,037       $47.40    11/18/2026        
  11/16/2017   7,093       $55.17    11/16/2027        
  11/13/2018   8,571    4,286   $27.26    11/13/2028        
  11/13/2018           4,127  $197,106     
  11/12/2019   2,992    5,985   $33.47    11/12/2029        
  11/12/2019              5,901   $281,832 
  11/12/2019           2,950  $140,892     
  11/12/2020       7,319   $35.78    11/12/2030        
  11/12/2020              6,288   $300,315 
  11/12/2020           3,144  $150,157     

Jason L. Taylor

  11/14/2012   4,000       $30.15    11/14/2022        
  11/22/2013   2,152       $36.19    11/22/2023        
  11/21/2014   2,500       $28.64    11/21/2024        
  11/20/2015   3,595       $37.89    11/20/2025        
  11/18/2016   3,519       $47.40    11/18/2026        
  11/16/2017   2,522       $55.17    11/16/2027        
  11/13/2018   2,286    1,143   $27.26    11/13/2028        
  11/13/2018           688  $32,859     
  11/12/2019   1,212    2,424   $33.47    11/12/2029        
  11/12/2019              1,046   $$49,957 
  11/12/2019           747  $35,677     
  11/12/2020       4,880   $35.78    11/12/2030        
  11/12/2020              4,192   $200,210 
   11/12/2020                       2,096  $100,105           

- 37 -


1

All stock options granted under our 2004 Stock Plan and our 2014 Stock Plan vest in three annual installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date.

2

These time-based restricted stock units vest and convert into common shares upon the third anniversary of the grant date, unless otherwise noted. The total market value is based on the price of the Company’sour common stock of $51.25 as$47.76 per share at the end of September 30, 2017, the values of the number of unvestedfiscal year 2021.

3

These performance-based restricted stock units that would vest on death or disability asthe third anniversary of thatthe grant date, forsubject to the named executive officers were as follows: Mr. Buck — $1,062,105, Mr. Isabella — $5,085,179, Mr. Nowicki — $2,308,966 and Mr. Cooper — $820,154. Upon a change in control, restricted stock units will vest (at the maximum level in the case of performance-based units, except as provided below). BasedCompany meeting defined performance metrics. The total market value is based on the price of the Company’sour common stock of $51.25 as$47.76 per share at the end of September 30, 2017,fiscal year 2021 and vesting at target.

4

This time-based restricted stock unit vested and converted into common shares on November 13, 2021.

5

This time-based restricted stock unit vests and converts into common shares upon the valuessecond anniversary of the grant date.

6

This time-based restricted stock unit vests and converts into common shares in three annual installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding stock option awards exercised and restricted stock unit awards vested by the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021:

OPTIONS EXERCISED AND STOCK VESTED
   Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of shares
acquired on exercise

(#)
   Value realized on
exercise1

($)
   Number of shares
acquired on vesting

(#)
   Value realized on  
vesting2  

($)  
 

Julian G. Francis

      $                      —       $                    —   

Frank A. Lonegro

           14,992    825,310   

Jonathan S. Bennett

               —   

C. Munroe Best

   11,000    311,732    8,221    313,385   

Jason L. Taylor

   3,387    116,818    1,094    41,703   

1

Calculated by multiplying the difference between the market price and exercise price on the date(s) of exercise by the number of unvested restricted stock units that would vestcommon shares acquired.

2

Calculated by multiplying the market price on a change in control asthe vesting date(s) by the number of that date for the named executive officers were as follows: Mr. Buck — $1,118,378, Mr. Isabella — $5,367,015, Mr. Nowicki — $2,398,436 and Mr.underlying common shares.

33


Cooper — $871,378.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control

Equity Award Agreements

Pursuant to stock option award agreements with our named executive officers, all of their outstanding stock options will vest upon death, disability or retirement (i.e., termination on or after age 65) and in the event of a change in control (subject to the conditions discussed below).

Pursuant to restricted stock unit award agreements with our named executive officers, restricted stock units will vest upon death, disability, or, subject to the conditions discussed below, a change of control (at target in the case of performance-based units). In the case of retirement, restricted stock units will vest (in the case of performance-based units, at the end of the performance period based on actual performance, or upon death, if earlier, at the target level).

Equity awards granted in fiscal year 2015 and later contain a “double trigger” change in control mechanism. Unless an award is continued or assumed by a public company in an equitable manner, it shall become fully vested immediately prior to a change in control (at 100% in the case of a performance-based award). If an award is so continued or assumed, vesting will continue in accordance with the terms of the award, unless there is a qualifying termination (without cause or for good reason) within one-year following the change in control, in which event the award shall become fully vested immediately (at 100% in the case of a performance-based award). Options granted prior to fiscal year 2015 vest immediately upon a change in control.

For purposes of the equity award agreements, “change in control” means: (a) any individual or entity becomes the beneficial owner of securities of the Company representing 50.1% or more of the combined voting power of the Company; (b) the Company

- 38 -


consummates a merger, consolidation or other similar transaction unless, following such transaction, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity or its parent is then beneficially owned by all or substantially all of the beneficial owners of the Company’s outstanding securities immediately prior to such transaction, in substantially the same proportions; (c) the Company sells all or substantially all of its business and/or assets unless, following such sale, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding securities of the acquiring entity or its parent is then beneficially owned by all or substantially all of the beneficial owners of the Company’s outstanding securities immediately prior to such sale, in substantially the same proportions; or (d) during any period of two consecutive years or less, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board (and any new directors, whose appointment by the Board or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose appointment or nomination was so approved, other than those elected as a result of an actual or threatened proxy contest) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board. “Cause” and “good reason” have definitions substantially similar to those included in the Severance Agreements discussed below.

Severance Agreements

Pursuant to Executive Severance and Restrictive Covenant Agreements (the “Severance Agreements”) with each of our named executive officers, in the event the Company terminates a named executive officer without cause, or a named executive officer terminates for good reason, the Company shall provide the named executive officer with the following payments and benefits:

18 months of annual base salary (24 months in the case of the Chief Executive Officer), paid in equal periodic installments on the Company’s regular payroll dates;

150% (200% in the case of the Chief Executive Officer) of the named executive officer’s target annual cash incentive, paid in equal periodic installments over the salary continuation period;

the annual cash incentive with respect to any fiscal year completed prior to the termination date but not yet paid, paid in a lump sum on the date such cash incentive is paid to other employees;

to the extent the named executive officer elects health benefit continuation under COBRA, continued participation in Beacon’s health plan at active employee rates for 12 months (18 months in the case of the Chief Executive Officer); and

continued vesting in all unvested equity awards that are scheduled to vest in the 12-month period following the termination date.

For purposes of the Severance Agreement, “cause” means: (i) gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of duties, (ii) refusal to perform duties as reasonably and lawfully directed (subject to notice and cure period), (iii) any act of fraud or embezzlement, wrongful taking for personal use, or self-dealing, (iv) conviction for (or plea of guilty or nolo contendre to) any felony or lesser crime involving moral turpitude that reasonably would be expected to materially damage the Company financially or reputationally, (v) material failure to comply with any material written policy (subject to notice and cure period), (vi) use of any illegal drug or abuse or misuse of alcohol and/or prescription drugs which materially adversely affects performance, or (vii) dissemination of confidential information or breach of restrictive covenants (excluding any unintentional and de minimis violations that are promptly cured). “Good reason” means, without the named executive officer’s consent, (i) a material reduction in authority, duties, or responsibilities, (ii) a greater than ten percent (10%) reduction in base salary (on an annualized basis), other than as part of an across-the-board reduction affecting similarly situated Beacon executives of not greater than twenty percent (20%) on an annualized basis and not in excess of 12 months, (iii) a relocation of primary work location more than 50 miles (and not closer to the then primary residence), or (iv) a material breach by the Company of any employment agreement (subject to notice and cure period, and resignation after cure period).

A named executive officer’s receipt of the above payments and benefits is conditioned upon the execution and delivery, not subsequently revoked, of a waiver and release of claims.

The Severance Agreements contain non-competition provisions continuing through a restriction period. The restriction period is 12 months in the case of termination by the Company for cause or by the named executive officer without good reason. The restriction period is 24 months (36 months in the case of the Chief Executive Officer) in the case of a termination by the Company without

- 39 -


cause or by the named executive officer for good reason. In the case of a 12-month restriction period (termination for cause or voluntary resignation without good reason), the non-competition provisions shall apply broadly with respect to industry participants. In the case of a 24-month or 36-month restriction period (termination without cause or for good reason), the non-competition provisions shall apply with respect to a list of industry participants identified in, or pursuant to, the Severance Agreement. During the applicable restriction period, the named executive officer will be subject to covenants with respect to non-solicitation, non-disparagement, and non-endorsement of competing products. The named executive officers are also subject to a perpetual confidentiality covenant.

Amounts Payable

The following table quantifies the amounts that would be payable to the named executive officers (1) upon termination of their employment without cause or for good reason under the terms of our Severance Agreements and (2) upon death, disability or retirement, or, if applicable, upon a change in control or qualifying termination following a change in control under the terms of our equity award agreements. The amounts shown assume that the triggering events occurred on the last day of our fiscal year, September 30, 2021.

 
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL 
     

Name

  

Benefit

  Involuntary
termination without
cause or voluntary
termination for good
reason
   Death, disability or
retirement
     Change in control1   

Julian G. Francis

  Base salary continuation  $1,630,000     $—     $—   
  Annual cash incentive   1,874,500      —      —   
  Value of unvested stock options2   1,264,359      1,462,472      1,462,472   
  Value of unvested RSUs3   1,392,634      6,158,413      6,158,413   
  Health benefit4   32,626      —      —   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total estimated value

  $6,194,119     $7,620,885     $7,620,885   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Frank A. Lonegro

  Base salary continuation  $841,500     $—     $—   
  Annual cash incentive   673,200      —      —   
  Value of unvested stock options2   497,149      1,059,870      1,059,870   
  Value of unvested RSUs3   715,970      2,749,925      2,749,925   
  Health benefit4   21,571      —      —   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total estimated value

  $2,749,390     $3,809,795     $3,809,795   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Jonathan S. Bennett

  Base salary continuation  $840,000     $—     $—   
  Annual cash incentive   504,000      —      —   
  Value of unvested stock options2   —      —      —   
  Value of unvested RSUs3   193,810      996,751      996,751   
  Health benefit4   24,534      —      —   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total estimated value

  $1,562,344     $996,751     $996,751   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

C. Munroe Best

  Base salary continuation  $692,004     $—     $—   
  Annual cash incentive   415,202      —      —   
  Value of unvested stock options2   159,864      261,070      261,070   
  Value of unvested RSUs3   197,106      1,070,302      1,070,302   
  Health benefit4   21,571      —      —   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total estimated value

  $1,485,747     $1,331,372     $1,331,372   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Jason L. Taylor

  Base salary continuation  $600,000     $—     $—   
  Annual cash incentive   360,000      —      —   
  Value of unvested stock options2   60,242      116,533      116,533   
  Value of unvested RSUs3   32,859      418,807      418,807   
  Health benefit4   21,571      —      —   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total estimated value

  $1,074,672     $535,340     $535,340   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
                   

- 40 -


1

Equity awards granted in fiscal years 2015 and later are subject to a “double trigger.” Amounts presented assume such awards were not continued or assumed by a public company in an equitable manner (with or without a termination), or were so continued or assumed followed by a qualifying termination (without cause or for good reason) within one year following the change in control.

2

Based on a Company stock price of $47.76 as of September 30, 2021, and the difference between such stock price and the exercise price of unvested options. Pursuant to the terms of the Severance Agreements, stock option awards will continue to vest over 12 months following a termination without cause or for good reason. Accordingly, values for such a termination cannot be determined as of September 30, 2021, and the amounts shown assume a stock price of $47.76 on each future vesting date.

3

Based on a Company stock price of $47.76 as of September 30, 2021. Pursuant to the terms of the Severance Agreements, restricted stock awards will continue to vest over 12 months following a termination without cause or for good reason. Accordingly, values for such a termination cannot be determined as of September 30, 2021, and the amounts shown assume a stock price of $47.76 on each future vesting date. In addition, in the case of retirement, performance-based restricted stock units will vest at the end of the performance period based on actual performance, (oror upon death, if earlier, at the target level)). Please see the second sentence of this paragraph for thelevel. Accordingly, values of performance-based restricted stock units at retirement cannot be determined as of September 30, 2021, and the amounts shown assume vesting at target and a stock price of $47.76 on the vesting date.

4

Amounts in this row consist of projected premiums for health benefit coverage, reduced by the amount of projected employee premiums, during the coverage continuation period for each named executive officer.

Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Company is providing the following disclosure about the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Francis, our Chief Executive Officer, to the median employee’s annual total compensation. SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and assumptions and, as a result, the pay ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.

Identification of Median Employee

We selected September 30, 2021, the end of our fiscal year, as the date on which to determine our median employee. For purposes of identifying the median employee, we considered all 6,671 U.S. employees, excluding the Chief Executive Officer. We selected gross earnings (which we define as all earnings before pre-tax payroll deductions) as it represents a broad and comprehensive measure of all compensation delivered to our U.S. employees and is readily available. In addition, we measured compensation for purposes of determining the median employee using the twelve-month period ending September 30, 2021. Relying on the de minimis exemption under the rules, we excluded all non-U.S. employees (all located in Canada) who in the aggregate comprised less than 5% of our total employees. Our total number of U.S. employees was 6,424 and our total number of non-U.S. employees was 247.

Ratio

Mr. Francis’s annual total compensation, as reported in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table, was $5,661,918. The median employee’s fiscal year 2021 annual total compensation that would be reportable in the Summary Compensation Table was $62,784. Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr.  Francis to the annual total compensation of our median employee is 90 to 1.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal year 2021, Neil Novich, Alan Gershenhorn, Douglas Young, Robert McLaughlin and Richard Frost served on the Compensation Committee. There are no Compensation Committee interlocks. None of the members of the Compensation Committee is an officer, employee or former officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries.

- 41 -


Compensation of Directors

The following table summarizes the compensation earned by our directors during the year ended September 30, 2021:

 
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
Name  

Fees earned or
paid in cash1

($)

   

Stock awards2

($)

   

Total

($)

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Carl T. Berquist

  $132,500   $129,997   $            262,497   

Barbara G. Fast

   109,375    129,997    239,372   

Richard W. Frost

   125,000    129,997    254,997   

Alan Gershenhorn

   112,500    129,997    242,497   

Philip W. Knisely3

   190,000    129,997    319,997   

Robert M. McLaughlin

   115,000    129,997    244,997   

Earl Newsome, Jr.

   53,789    126,790    180,579   

Neil S. Novich

   112,500    129,997    242,497   

Stuart A. Randle4

   137,500    129,997    267,497   

Nathan K. Sleeper

   97,500    129,997    227,497   

Douglas L. Young

   109,375    129,997    239,372   

1

These amounts reflect the directors’ annual retainer, additional retainers for service as the Chair, Lead Independent Director, Chairs of committees or service on committees, as applicable and described in more detail below, as well as fees for certain special committee assignments and meetings. Mr. Newsome joined the Board in March 2021 and therefore his fees reflect a partial year of service.

2

These amounts reflect the total estimated grant date fair value of restricted stock units that would vest upon retirement, based on the price of the Company’s stock of $51.25 as of September 30, 2017, for the named executive officers, assuming that performance-based units vest at target.

Beginning in fiscal 2015, equity awards contain a “double trigger” change in control mechanism. Unless an award is continued or assumed by a public company in an equitable manner, an award shall become fully vested immediately prior to a change in control (at 100% in the case of a performance-based award). If an award is so continued or assumed, vesting will continuecomputed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information regarding assumptions underlying the termsvaluation of stock awards, please refer to Notes 2 and 6 of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2021.

3

Chair of the award, unless there is a qualifying termination within one-year following the change in control, in which event the award shall become fully vested immediately (at 100% in the case of a performance-based award).Board.

4

Employment AgreementsLead Independent Director.

There are no employment, severance or change-in-control agreements currently entered into by and between any current executive officer and the Company.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors was comprised of Neil Novich, Alan Gershenhorn, Philip Knisely and Richard Frost. There are no Compensation Committee interlocks. None of the members of the Compensation Committee is an officer, employee or former officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries.

Compensation of Directors

The table below summarizes the compensation we paid to our non-employee directors during the year ended September 30, 2017.

As of September 30, 2021, stock awards outstanding for each director included the following:

 

Name

 

Fees earned

or paid

in cash

($)

 

 

Stock

awards(1)

($)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Carl T. Berquist

 

$

78,403

 

 

$

90,011

 

 

$

168,414

 

Richard W. Frost

 

 

80,000

 

 

 

90,011

 

 

 

170,011

 

Alan Gershenhorn

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

90,011

 

 

 

160,011

 

Philip Knisely

 

 

62,500

 

 

 

90,011

 

 

 

152,511

 

Robert M. McLaughlin

 

 

65,000

 

 

 

90,011

 

 

 

155,011

 

Neil S. Novich

 

 

78,750

 

 

 

90,011

 

 

 

168,761

 

Stuart A. Randle(2)

 

 

80,000

 

 

 

90,011

 

 

 

170,011

 

Douglas L. Young

 

 

72,500

 

 

 

90,011

 

 

 

162,511

 

34Name


Stock awards  
outstanding  

(#)  

Carl T. Berquist

16,020  

Barbara G. Fast

11,185  

Richard W. Frost

26,859  

Alan Gershenhorn

18,850  

Philip W. Knisely

17,626  

Robert M. McLaughlin

8,521  

Earl Newsome, Jr.

2,547  

Neil S. Novich

23,124  

Stuart A. Randle

19,242  

Nathan K. Sleeper

12,000  

Douglas L. Young

21,455  

No director had outstanding stock options at September 30, 2021.

Our non-employee director compensation program is composed of the following:

 

(1)

an annual retainer of $90,000;

These amounts reflect the total estimated grant date fair value of restricted stock units computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

- 42 -


(2)

Lead Independent Director.

As of September 30, 2017, stock options outstanding, stock options exercisable and stock awards outstanding for each non-employee director included the following:

an annual stock award valued at approximately $130,000 which fully vests on the first anniversary of the grant date but does not settle until the date of the director’s termination of service on the Board, except that directors holding common stock and outstanding vested unexercised/unsettled equity awards with a total fair value that is greater than or equal to five times the annual cash retainer may elect to have future grants settle simultaneously with vesting;

an additional annual retainer of $100,000 for the Chair;

an additional annual retainer of $25,000 for the Lead Independent Director;

an additional annual retainer of $25,000 for the Audit Committee chair, $15,000 for the Compensation Committee chair, and $12,500 for the Nominating and Governance Committee chair;

an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for service on the Audit Committee and $7,500 for service on the other committees;

non-employee directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines that require directors to hold common stock and outstanding vested equity awards (consisting of restricted stock units not subject to forfeiture which settle upon retirement and excluding vested options, if any) with a total fair value greater than or equal to five times the annual cash retainer before any vested restricted stock units may be settled prior to termination of service on the Board; and

in addition, pursuant to the Company’s Insider Trading and Prohibition of Hedging and Pledging Policy (available on the “Investor Relations” page at www.becn.com), Company directors, officers, employees and members of their households may not enter into hedging or monetization transactions or similar arrangements with respect to Company securities, including the purchase or sale of puts or calls or the use of any other derivative instruments, nor may they hold Company securities in a margin account or pledge Company stock as collateral for a loan.

The retainer amounts set forth above were effective February 11, 2020 and were set by the Compensation Committee after a review with its consultant FW Cook of current market practices for similarly situated companies. The retainer amounts remained the same for fiscal year 2021.

Name

 

Options

outstanding

(#)

 

 

Options

exercisable

(#)

 

 

Stock awards

outstanding

(#)

 

Carl T. Berquist

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,020

 

Richard W. Frost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,859

 

Alan Gershenhorn

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,850

 

Philip Knisely

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,626

 

Robert M. McLaughlin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,020

 

Neil S. Novich

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,859

 

Stuart A. Randle

 

 

25,220

 

 

 

25,220

 

 

 

18,476

 

Douglas L. Young

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,455

 

Our non-employee director compensation program is comprised of the following:

an annual retainer of $55,000;

an annual stock award valued at approximately $90,000 which fully vests on the first anniversary of the grant date but does not settle until the date of the director’s termination of service on the Board, except that, beginning in fiscal year 2016, directors holding common stock and outstanding vested unexercised/unsettled equity awards with a total fair value that is greater than or equal to five times the annual cash retainer may elect to have future grants settle simultaneously with vesting (grants made prior to fiscal 2014 settle on a date that is six months after the director’s termination of service on the Board);

an additional annual retainer of $25,000 for the Lead Independent Director;

an additional annual retainer of $20,000 for the Audit Committee Chair and $10,000 for the other committee chairs;

an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for service on the Audit Committee and $7,500 for service on the other committees;

non-employee directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines that require directors to hold common stock and outstanding vested unexercised/unsettled equity awards with a total fair value greater than or equal to five times the annual cash award before any vested restricted stock units may be settled prior to termination of service on the Board; and

in addition, pursuant to the Company’s Insider Trading and Prohibition of Hedging and Pledging Policy (available on the “Investor Relations” page at www.becn.com), Company officers, directors, and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging and pledging shares of Company stock.

Additional fees may be payable if the number of Board or committee meetings exceed 12 or 8, respectively, during a fiscal year. We reimburse members of our Board of Directors for any out-of-pocket expenses they incur in connection with services provided as directors.

Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive compensation for their services as directors. Employee compensation for Mr. Francis is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table above.

- 43 -


STOCK OWNERSHIP

The following table shows information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock and our Preferred Stock for the following:

Each stockholder known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock or our Preferred Stock;

Each of our directors;

Each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table in “Executive Compensation;” and

All directors and executive officers as a group.

   
   Common stock
    beneficially owned1    
   Preferred stock
beneficially owned
 

Name and address of beneficial owners

      Shares       Percent           Shares           Percent     

Stockholders owning more than 5% of our common stock:

        

CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P.2

  

 

24,240,592

 

  

 

30.3

  

 

400,000

 

  

 

100.0%

 

c/o M&C Corporate Services Limited

        

P.O. Box 309, Ugland House

        

South Church Street

        

George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104

        

Cayman Islands, British West Indies

        

FMR LLC3

  

 

7,074,316

 

  

 

10.0

    

245 Summer Street

        

Boston, MA 02210

        

The Vanguard Group4

  

 

5,024,529

 

  

 

7.1

    

100 Vanguard Boulevard

        

Malvern, PA 19355

        

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP5

  

 

4,983,567

 

  

 

7.1

    

6300 Bee Cave Road

        

Building One

        

Austin, TX 78746

        

BlackRock, Inc.6

  

 

4,109,745

 

  

 

5.8

    

55 East 52nd Street

        

New York, NY 10055

        

Directors and named executive officers:

        

Julian G. Francis7

  

 

106,902

 

  

 

*

 

    

Frank A. Lonegro8

  

 

33,809

 

  

 

*

 

    

Jonathan S. Bennett9

  

 

 

  

 

*

 

    

C. Munroe Best10

  

 

113,144

 

  

 

*

 

    

Jason L. Taylor11

  

 

31,705

 

  

 

*

 

    

Carl T. Berquist12

  

 

26,020

 

  

 

*

 

    

Barbara G. Fast13

  

 

11,815

 

  

 

*

 

    

Richard W. Frost14

  

 

63,034

 

  

 

*

 

    

Alan Gershenhorn15

  

 

18,850

 

  

 

*

 

    

Philip W. Knisely16

  

 

23,626

 

  

 

*

 

    

Robert M. McLaughlin17

  

 

29,020

 

  

 

*

 

    

Earl Newsome, Jr.18

  

 

 

  

 

*

 

    

Neil S. Novich19

  

 

39,355

 

  

 

*

 

    

Stuart A. Randle20

  

 

45,323

 

  

 

*

 

    

Nathan K. Sleeper21

  

 

12,000

 

  

 

*

 

    

Douglas L. Young22

  

 

35,955

 

  

 

*

 

    

All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons):

  

 

670,785

 

  

 

*

 

          

- 44 -


*

Less than 1%.

1

Except as noted otherwise, information concerning beneficial ownership of shares is as of December 22, 2021, including the percentage of shares beneficially owned which is based on 70,426,790 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 22, 2021. Amounts include the number of Board or committee meetings exceed 12 or 8, respectively, during a fiscal year. We reimburse membersshares beneficially owned as of our Board of Directors for any out-of-pocket expenses they incur in connection with services providedthat date, as directors.

Directors who are employees ofwell as the Company do not receive compensation for their services as directors.

35


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We operate within a comprehensive plan of corporate governance for the purpose of defining responsibilities, setting high standards of professional and personal conduct and assuring compliance with such responsibilities and standards. We regularly monitor developments in the area of corporate governance. We are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act which, among other things, establish, or provide the basis for, a number of corporate governance standardsshares that such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days thereafter. In addition, except as noted otherwise, all persons named as beneficial owners have sole voting power and disclosure requirements. We are following the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act and SEC rules as they relate to us.

EMPLOYEE CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS AND CONDUCT

We have adopted the Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. Code of Conduct, a code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and any other persons performing similar functions. This code of conduct is available on our website at www.becn.com. If we make any substantive amendments to this code of conduct or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the code to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or any other persons performing similar functions, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website within four business days.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Investment Agreement and Preferred Stock Terms

On August 24, 2017, in connection with the execution of a stock purchase agreementsole investment power with respect to the acquisition of Allied Building Products Corp. (the “Allied Acquisition”), the Company entered into an investment agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) withshares indicated as beneficially owned.

2

Based on share information for CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P. (the “CD(“CD&R Stockholder” and, together with its affiliated funds,) as of April 29, 2021, reported on Schedule 13D filed by them on April 29, 2021, as supplemented by subsequent Form 4 filings, CD&R Stockholder is the “CD&R Investors”beneficial owner of 24,240,592 shares of common stock (the “Common Shares”) and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund IX, L.P. for, consisting of 14,545,973 shares of common stock plus 9,694,619 shares of common stock on an as-converted basis (based on the purchaseinitial conversion price of $41.26, as adjusted), which are issuable upon conversion, at the option of the holder, of the 400,000 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). On January 2, 2018, in conjunction with, that, as of December 22, 2021, were held directly by CD&R Stockholder. CD&R Investment Associates IX, Ltd. (“CD&R Holdings GP”), as the closinggeneral partner of the Allied Acquisition, CD&R Stockholder, purchased 400,000 shares ofmay be deemed to beneficially own the Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of $400.0 million, at a purchase price of $1,000 per share. The Preferred Stock is convertible perpetual participating preferred stock of the Company, with an initial conversion price of $41.26 per share, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, and accrue dividends at a rate of 6.0% per annum (payableCommon Shares in cash or in-kind), subject to adjustment to 9.0% per annum on the occurrence of certain triggering events.

Subject to certain limitations, the Companywhich CD&R Stockholder has the option to redeem the outstanding Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, for an aggregate redemption price equal to two times the liquidation valuebeneficial ownership. CD&R Holdings GP expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares being redeemed. Inin which CD&R Stockholder has beneficial ownership. Investment and voting decisions with respect to the eventPreferred Stock and Common Shares held by CD&R Stockholder or CD&R Holdings GP are made by an investment committee composed of a changemore than ten investment professionals of controlClayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (the “Investment Committee”). All members of the Company, each holderInvestment Committee disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares shown as beneficially owned by CD&R Stockholder. CD&R Holdings GP is managed by a two-person board of directors. Donald J. Gogel and Nathan K. Sleeper, as the directors of CD&R Holdings GP, may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the Preferred Stock and Common Shares directly held by CD&R Stockholder. Such persons expressly disclaim such beneficial ownership.

3

Based on the share information for FMR LLC, as of June 30, 2021, reported on Schedule 13G filed by it on July 12, 2021. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC. Both of the foregoing are named as reporting persons in the Schedule 13G. FMR LLC reported sole voting power with respect to 189,936 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,074,316 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to none of the shares.

4

Based on the share information for The Vanguard Group as of December 31, 2020, reported on Schedule 13G filed by it on February 10, 2021, The Vanguard Group reported sole voting power with respect to none of the shares, shared voting power with respect to 56,772 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,921,252 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 103,277 shares.

5

Based on the share information for Dimensional Fund Advisors LP as of December 31, 2020, reported on Schedule 13G filed by it on February 12, 2021, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported sole voting power with respect to 4,841,491 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,983,567 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to none of the shares.

6

Based on the share information for BlackRock, Inc. as of December 31, 2020, reported on Schedule 13G filed by it on January 29, 2021, BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 3,991,902 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,109,745 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to none of the shares.

7

Includes 94,889 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options. Does not include 72,250 stock options, 39,238 restricted stock units with time-based vesting, or 78,475 restricted stock units with performance-based vesting, all of which were unvested and outstanding as of the record date.

8

Includes 19,741 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options. Does not include 39,483 stock options, 43,464 restricted stock units with time-based vesting, or 14,114 restricted stock units with performance-based vesting, all of which were unvested and outstanding as of the record date.

9

Does not include 20,870 restricted stock units with time-based vesting, which were unvested and outstanding as of the record date.

10

Includes 58,241 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options. Does not include 7,871 stock options, 6,094 restricted stock units with time-based vesting, or 12,189 restricted stock units with performance-based vesting, all of which were unvested and outstanding as of the record date.

11

Includes 25,768 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options. Does not include 4,465 stock options, 2,843 restricted stock units with time-based vesting, or 5,238 restricted stock units with performance-based vesting, all of which were unvested and outstanding as of the record date.

12

Includes 16,020 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

13

Consists of 11,185 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

- 45 -


14

Includes 22,455 restricted stock units with time-based vesting. Does not include 4,404 restricted stock units with time-based vesting that will havenot settle until six months after termination of service on the option to require the Company to purchase all or any portionBoard.

15

Includes of 18,850 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

16

Includes 17,626 restricted stock units with time-based vesting. Does not include 24,015,591 shares of common stock deemed beneficially owned by CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P. as a result of its shares at a price per share equal to the liquidation value of such shares.

Holdersownership of the Preferred Stock generally will be entitled to vote with holders of sharesand Common Shares. By virtue of the Company’s common stock on all matters submitted for a shareholder vote (voting together with holders of shares of the Company’s common stock as one class) and willrelationship described in footnote (2), Mr. Knisely may be entitleddeemed to a number of votes equal to the number of votes to which shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon conversion of such Preferred Stock would have been entitled. Additionally, certain matters will require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Preferred Stock, voting as a separate class.

The Investment Agreement provides that the CD&R Investors (i) may designate two directors, for so long as the CD&R Investors hold Preferred Stock (or shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon conversion of the Preferred Stock) representing at least 50%share beneficial ownership of the shares of Preferred Stock initially issued to theheld by CD&R Stockholder at closing, and (ii) may designate one director, for so long asBoulder Holdings, L.P. Mr. Knisely disclaims such beneficial ownership.

17

Includes 8,521 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

18

Does not include 2,547 unvested restricted stock units with time-based vesting that were granted on March 1, 2021.

19

Includes 18,720 restricted stock units with time-based vesting. Does not include 4,404 restricted stock units with time-based vesting that will not settle until six months after termination of service on the CD&R Investors hold Preferred Stock (orBoard.

20

Includes 12,299 restricted stock units with time-based vesting. Does not include 10,678 restricted stock units with time-based vesting that will not settle until six months after termination of service on the Board.

21

Consists of 12,000 restricted stock units with time-based vesting. Does not include 24,015,591 shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon conversiondeemed beneficially owned by CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P. as a result of the Preferred Stock) representing less than 50%, but at least 25%, of such shares so received by the CD&R Stockholder.

36


For so long as the CD&R Investors hold Preferred Stock (or shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon conversion of the Preferred Stock) representing at least 25% of the sharesits ownership of the Preferred Stock initially issuedand Common Shares. By virtue of the relationship described in footnote (2), Mr. Sleeper may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares held by CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P. Mr. Sleeper disclaims such beneficial ownership.

22

Includes 21,455 restricted stock units with time-based vesting.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of September 30, 2021 with respect to each equity plan or arrangement pursuant to which warrants or options to purchase our common shares have been granted.

    

Plan category1

  Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

(a)2
   Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights

(b)
   Number of securities  
remaining available for  
issuance under equity  
compensation plans  
(excluding securities  
reflected in column (a))  

(c)  
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  

 

2,813,774  

 

  

$

34.88  

 

  

 

5,335,879  

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

1

See Notes 2 and 6 to the CD&R Stockholder at closing, the CD&R Investors will have customary preemptive rights to participate in future equity and equity-linked issuances by the Company up to the extent necessary to maintain its pro rata ownership percentageConsolidated Financial Statements in the Company, subjectCompany’s latest Form 10-K for additional information regarding our stock-based compensation plans.

2

In addition to customary exceptions.

Registration Rights Agreement

On January 2, 2018, pursuant tooptions, the Investment Agreement, the Company enteredamounts shown in column (a) reflect time-based and performance-based restricted stock units. The weighted-average price shown in column (b) does not take restricted stock units into a registration rights agreement with the CD&R Stockholder, pursuant to which the Company agreed to file a resale shelf registration statement for the benefit of the CD&R Stockholder and its permitted transferees (collectively, the “CD&R Stockholders”) promptly upon the expiration of the 18-month post-closing lock-up period, and pursuant to which the CD&R Stockholders may make up to four requests that the Company conduct an underwritten offering of, or register, shares of the Company’s common stock received upon conversion of the Preferred Stock held by the CD&R Stockholders. The CD&R Stockholders also have customary piggyback registration rights and may request that the Company include their registrable securities in certain future registration statements or offerings of common stock by the Company. These registration rights will terminate when the CD&R Stockholders no longer own any registrable securities or Preferred Stock.account.

- 46 -


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We operate within a comprehensive plan of corporate governance for the purpose of defining responsibilities, setting high standards of professional and personal conduct and assuring compliance with such responsibilities and standards. We regularly monitor developments in the area of corporate governance. We are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act which, among other things, establish, or provide the basis for, a number of corporate governance standards and disclosure requirements. We are following the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act and SEC rules as they relate to us.

CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT

We have adopted the Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (the “Code”), a code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and any other persons performing similar functions. The Code is available on our website at www.becn.com. If we make any substantive amendments to the Code or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or any other persons performing similar functions, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website within four business days.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Relationship with Cornerstone

The Company purchases products from Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. (formerly Ply Gem Industries, Inc.) and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Cornerstone”), the largest North American integrated manufacturer and marketer of external building products for the commercial, residential, and repair & remodel construction industries. Investment funds managed by, or affiliated with, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC own a substantial minority of the capital stock of Cornerstone. During the twelve months ending September 30, 2021, Cornerstone invoiced the Company an aggregate of approximately $134.2 million. The Company believes that the terms of the purchases made from Cornerstone were no less favorable to the Company in the aggregate than would otherwise have been obtained from unrelated third parties. The Company’s relationship with Cornerstone predates the CD&R investment in the Company.

Relationship with White Cap    

The Company purchases from, and sells products to, White Cap Supply Holdings, LLC, a distributor of specialty concrete and construction products. Investment funds managed by, or affiliated with, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC own a substantial majority of the capital stock of White Cap. During the twelve months ending September 30, 2021, White Cap invoiced the Company approximately $0.1 million and the Company invoiced White Cap approximately $6.6 million. The Company believes that the terms of the purchases made from and sales to White Cap were no less favorable to the Company in the aggregate than would otherwise have been obtained from unrelated third parties. The Company’s relationship with White Cap and its corporate predecessor predates the CD&R investment in Beacon.

Relationship with CD&R

On August 24, 2017, in connection with the execution of a stock purchase agreement with respect to the acquisition of Allied Building Products Corp. (the “Allied Acquisition”), the Company entered into an investment agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) with CD&R Boulder Holdings, L.P. (the “CD&R Stockholder” and, together with its affiliated funds, the “CD&R Investors”) and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund IX, L.P. for the purchase of shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). On January 2, 2018, in conjunction with the closing of the Allied Acquisition, CD&R Stockholder purchased 400,000 shares of Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of $400.0 million, at a purchase price of $1,000 per share. The Preferred Stock is convertible perpetual participating

- 47 -


preferred stock of the Company, with an initial conversion price of $41.26 per share, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, and accrues dividends at a rate of 6.0% per annum (payable in cash or in-kind), subject to adjustment to 9.0% per annum on the occurrence of certain triggering events.

Subject to certain limitations, the Company has the option to redeem the outstanding Preferred Stock, in whole or in part (though no less than one third of the Preferred Stock originally issued), for an aggregate redemption price equal to two times the liquidation value of the shares being redeemed plus any accrued dividends. In the event of a change of control of the Company, each holder of the Preferred Stock will have the option to require the Company to purchase all or any portion of its shares at a price per share equal to the liquidation value of such shares plus any accrued dividends.

Holders of the Preferred Stock are generally entitled to vote with holders of shares of the Company’s common stock on all matters submitted for a stockholder vote (voting together with holders of shares of the Company’s common stock as one class) and will be entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of votes to which shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon conversion of such Preferred Stock would have been entitled. Additionally, certain matters will require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Preferred Stock, voting as a separate class. Holders of the Preferred Stock have agreed to cause the Preferred Stock and common stock beneficially owned to be voted at any meeting of stockholders (i) in favor of each director nominated and recommended by the Board for election and (ii) against any stockholder nominations for director or other stockholder proposals which are not approved and recommended by the Board.

The Investment Agreement provides that the CD&R Investors (i) may designate two directors, for so long as the CD&R Investors hold Preferred Stock (or shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon conversion of the Preferred Stock) representing at least 50% of the shares of Preferred Stock initially issued to the CD&R Stockholder at closing, and (ii) may designate one director, for so long as the CD&R Investors hold Preferred Stock (or shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon conversion of the Preferred Stock) representing less than 50%, but at least 25%, of such shares so received by the CD&R Stockholder.

For so long as the CD&R Investors hold Preferred Stock (or shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon conversion of the Preferred Stock) representing at least 25% of the shares of the Preferred Stock initially issued to the CD&R Stockholder at closing, the CD&R Investors will have customary preemptive rights to participate in future equity and equity-linked issuances by the Company up to the extent necessary to maintain its pro rata ownership percentage in the Company, subject to customary exceptions.

On January 2, 2018, pursuant to the Investment Agreement, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the CD&R Stockholder, pursuant to which the Company agreed to file a resale shelf registration statement for the benefit of the CD&R Stockholder and its permitted transferees (collectively, the “CD&R Stockholders”) upon the request of the CD&R Stockholder, and pursuant to which the CD&R Stockholders may make up to four requests that the Company conduct an underwritten offering of, or register, shares of the Company’s common stock received upon conversion of the Preferred Stock held by the CD&R Stockholders. The CD&R Stockholders also have customary piggyback registration rights and may request that the Company include their registrable securities in certain future registration statements or offerings of common stock by the Company. These registration rights will terminate when the CD&R Stockholders no longer own any registrable securities or Preferred Stock.

Best Leases

Clement Munroe Best III is a trustee for a trust which owns a minority stake in M. Best & Sons, an entity controlled by members of Mr. Best’s family. The Company currently leases four buildings from M. Best & Sons for approximately $0.8 million for the twelve months ending September 30, 2021. The original lease relationships predate Beacon’s acquisition of Best Distributing in 2000 and were not related party transactions with respect to Beacon at the time. The Company believes that the current terms of these leases approximate those the Company would negotiate in arms-length transactions with unrelated third parties.

- 48 -


POLICIES AND PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO TRANSACTIONS

WITH RELATED PERSONS

Our finance and legal departments are primarily responsible for identifying and reviewing relationships and transactions in which the Company and our directors, executive officers, and/or certain of our stockholders or their immediate family members are participants to determine whether any of these related parties had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. In order to identify potential related person transactions, our legal department annually prepares and distributes to all directors and executive officers and/or certain of our shareholders or their immediate family members are participants to determine whether any of these related parties had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. In order to identify potential related person transactions, our legal department annually prepares and distributes to all directors and named executives a written questionnaire which includes questions intended to elicit information about any related person transactions. Pursuant to the Company’s written contract review policy, approved by our Board, all agreements covered by this policy with “Related Persons,” as that term is defined pursuant to Item 404(a) of SEC Regulation S-K, must be submitted for review and approval by the Audit Committee. In evaluating related person transactions, our Audit Committee members apply the same standards of good faith and fiduciary duty they apply to their general responsibilities as a committee of the Board and as individual directors. The Audit Committee may approve a related person transaction when, in its good faith judgment, the transaction is in the best interests of the Company.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMDELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5, as applicable, with the SEC.

Based solely on our review of the copies of these forms as filed or representations from certain reporting persons that no forms were required to be filed, we believe that all of our officers, directors, and greater than ten percent beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them under Section 16(a) with respect to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, except that each of Messrs. Jason L. Taylor and James J. Gosa filed his Form 3 late.

The firm of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, has been our auditor since 1997 and has advised us that the firm does not have any direct financial interest or indirect financial interest in the Company or any of its subsidiaries. It is expected that a representative of such firm will (i) attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, (ii) have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and (iii) be available to respond to appropriate questions.

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors knows of no other business to be brought before the annual meeting. If, however, any other business should properly come before the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote proxies as in their discretion they may deem appropriate, unless they are directed by a proxy to do otherwise.

37


A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, including the financial statements and schedules but excluding certain exhibits, will be made available without charge to interested shareholders upon written request to us.

INFORMATION CONCERNING SHAREHOLDERSTOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Shareholders interested in presenting a proposal for consideration at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders may do so by following the procedures prescribed in Rule 14a-8 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. To be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the meeting, shareholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than September 12, 2018. In accordance with our Bylaws, any shareholder proposal submitted other than for inclusion in the proxy materials for that meeting must be delivered to us no earlier than October 16, 2018 and no later than November 15, 2018, or such proposal will be considered untimely. This notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws.

By Order of the Board of Directors

/s/ Ross D. Cooper

ROSS D. COOPER, Secretary

Herndon, Virginia

January 10, 2018

In light of the recent change in our fiscal year from September 30 to December 31, we expect that the timing of our future Annual Meetings of Stockholders will be pushed back by approximately three months as compared to prior years. As a result, we currently anticipate holding our Annual Meeting of Stockholders for the fiscal year 2023 in May 2023.

Stockholders interested in presenting a proposal for consideration at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders may do so by following the procedures prescribed in Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, stockholders may present appropriate proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at our annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals to us in a timely manner (typically not less than 120 days before the date the prior year’s annual meeting proxy statement was released to stockholders or, if the annual meeting date has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the previous year’s meeting, a reasonable time before the company begins to print and send its proxy materials). To be eligible for inclusion in the 2023 proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the meeting, stockholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary at 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 300, Herndon, Virginia 20170, no later than January 19, 2023, which the Company considers to be a reasonable time before it intends to begin printing and sending proxy materials.

Our By-Laws provide an advance notice procedure for certain business, or nominations to the Board, to be brought before an Annual Meeting. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of Stockholders; provided, however, that if the Annual Meeting is not held within thirty (30) days before or after such anniversary date, then for the notice by the stockholder to be timely it must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the date on which the notice of such meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of such meeting was made, whichever occurs first. Because of our change in fiscal year, the deadline is subject to the ten-day period described in the prior sentence. Beacon intends to publicly announce a date for the 2023 Annual

- 49 -


Meeting of Stockholders no earlier than February 8, 2023 in which case such proposals will be due no later than February 18, 2023. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to require us to include in our Proxy Statement and proxy relating to an Annual Meeting any stockholder proposal that does not meet all of the requirements for inclusion established by the SEC in effect at the time such proposal is received.

 

38


OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors knows of no other business to be brought before the annual meeting. If, however, any other business should properly come before the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote proxies as in their discretion they may deem appropriate, unless they are directed by a proxy to do otherwise.

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, including the financial statements and schedules but excluding certain exhibits, will be made available without charge to interested stockholders upon written request to us.

By Order of the Board of Directors

LOGO

CHRISTINE S. REDDY, Corporate Secretary

Herndon, Virginia

January 14, 2022

- 50 -


LOGO

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! PLEASE VOTE BY: BEACON P.O. BOX 8016, CARY, NC 27512-9903 INTERNET Go To: www.proxypush.com/BECN Cast your vote online Have your Proxy Card ready Follow the simple instructions to record your vote PHONE Call 1-866-859-2136 Use any touch-tone telephone Have your Proxy Card ready Follow the simple recorded instructions MAIL Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card Fold and return your Proxy Card in the postage-paid envelope provided Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. Annual Meeting of Stockholders For Stockholders as of record on December 22, 2021 TIME:    Friday, February 18, 2022, 08:00 AM, Eastern Time PLACE: Beacon’s Corporate Headquarters 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Herndon, VA, 20170 This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors The undersigned appoints Julian G. Francis and Frank A. Lonegro (the “Named Proxies”) and each of them as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the shares of common stock of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at Beacon’s Corporate Headquarters, 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Herndon, VA, 20170, on Friday, February 18, 2022 at 8:00 a.m. ET and all adjournments and postponements thereof. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of (i) the Company’s 2021 Annual Report, (ii) the proxy statement and (iii) the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders dated January 14, 2022. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. If you hold shares in the 401(k) savings plan of the Company (the “Plan”), then this proxy card, when signed and returned, or your telephone or Internet proxy, will constitute voting instructions on matters properly coming before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. Voting instructions for shares in the Plan must be received by 11:59 p.m. ET on February 15, 2022. You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The Named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign (on the reverse side) and return this card or give your telephone or Internet proxy by 11:59 p.m. ET on February 17, 2022. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on February 18, 2022. The proxy statement and the 2021 Annual Report are also available at www.proxydocs.com/BECN


LOGO

Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE:
FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.
PROPOSAL    YOUR VOTE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
1. Election of 12 members of our Board of Directors to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. (Proposal No. 1);    FOR WITHHOLD
1.01 Philip W. Knisely     FOR
1.02 Julian G. Francis     FOR
1.03 Carl T. Berquist     FOR
1.04 Barbara G. Fast     FOR
1.05 Richard W. Frost     FOR
1.06 Alan Gershenhorn     FOR
1.07 Robert M. McLaughlin     FOR
1.08 Earl Newsome, Jr.     FOR
1.09 Neil S. Novich     FOR
1.10 Stuart A. Randle     FOR
1.11 Nathan K. Sleeper     FOR
1.12 Douglas L. Young     FOR
FOR    AGAINST ABSTAIN
2. To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 (Proposal No. 2);     FOR
3. To approve the compensation for our named executive officers as presented in the     FOR
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosures contained in the accompanying proxy statement on a non-binding, advisory basis (Proposal No. 3);
4. The transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof.
Check here if you would like to attend the meeting in person.
Authorized Signatures—Must be completed for your instructions to be executed.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your account. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy/Vote Form. Signature (and Title if applicable) Date Signature (if held jointly) Date

ANNUAL MEETING OF BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.  Annual Meeting of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.  to be held on Tuesday, February 13, 2018  for Holders as of December 18, 2017  This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors  Date: February 13, 2018  Time: 8:00 a.m. ET  Place: The Ritz-Carlton Naples   280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd.   Naples, FL 34108  Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided.  Please make your marks like this: Use dark black pencil or pen only  The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR all nominees for director  listed in proposal 1 and FOR proposals 2 and 3.  VOTE BY:   INTERNET  TELEPHONE  Call  1: Election of eleven members to our Board  of Directors to hold office until the 2019  Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their  successors are duly elected and qualified  (Proposal No. 1);  Go To  866-859-2136  www.proxypush.com/BECN  • Cast your vote online.  • View Meeting Documents.  • Use any touch-tone telephone.  • Have your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form ready.  • Follow the simple recorded instructions.  OR  Directors  Recommend    Withhold  For  MAIL  For  01 Robert R. Buck  02 Paul M. Isabella  03 Carl T. Berquist  04 Richard W. Frost  05 Alan Gershenhorn  06 Philip W. Knisely  07 Robert M. McLaughlin  08 Neil S. Novich  09 Stuart A. Randle  10 Nathan K. Sleeper  11 Douglas L. Young  • Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form.  • Detach your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form.  • Return your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form in the  postage-paid envelope provided.  OR  For  For  For  For  THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS  GIVEN, SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR  PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.  All votes must be received by 11:59 p.m. ET on February 12, 2018  All votes for 401(k) Plan or Solium Shareworks participants must be received by 11:59 p.m. ET  on February 5, 2018  Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of  Shareholders to be held on February 13, 2018: The Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report are available at www.proxydocs.com/BECN.  For  For  For  For  For  For   For Against Abstain  2: To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as  the Company’s independent registered public  accounting firm for the fiscal year ending  September 30, 2018 (Proposal No. 2);  For  PROXY TABULATOR FOR  3: To approve the compensation for our  named executive officers as presented in  the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,  the compensation tables, and the related  disclosures contained in the accompanying  proxy statement on a non-binding, advisory  basis (Proposal No. 3); and  Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.  For  P.O. Box 8016  Cary, NC 27512-9903  4: The transaction of such other business  as may properly come before the annual  meeting and any adjournment(s) or  postponement(s) thereof.  Authorized Signatures - This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.   Please Sign Here Please Date Above   Please Sign Here Please Date Above  Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear hereon. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should  sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should  provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy.  


39


Proxy — Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.  505 Huntmar Park Dr., Suite 300, Herndon, VA 20170  Annual Meeting of Shareholders  February 13, 2018, 8:00 a.m. ET  This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors  The undersigned appoints Paul M. Isabella and Joseph M. Nowicki (the “Named  Proxies”) and each of them as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of  substitution, to vote the shares of common stock of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.,  a Delaware corporation (“the Company”), the undersigned is entitled to vote at the  Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held at The Ritz-Carlton  Naples, 280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., Naples, FL 34108, on Tuesday, February 13,  2018 at 8:00 a.m. ET and all adjournments and postponements thereof.  The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of (i) the company’s 2017  Annual Report, (ii) the proxy statement and (iii) the Notice of Annual Meeting of  Shareholders dated January 10, 2018.  This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed  herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” all  nominees for director listed in proposal 1 and “FOR” proposals 2 and 3.  In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such  other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any  adjournment or postponement thereof.  This card will also be used to provide voting instructions to the trustee  for any shares of common stock held in the Beacon stock fund under the  Beacon 401(k) Plan and voting instructions for any shares of common  stock held on the Solium Shareworks platform.   You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box  (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote  in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The Named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card or  vote by telephone or Internet.  (Continued and to be signed on reverse side)  To attend the meeting and vote your shares   in person, please mark this box.  Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided.

  

40